Contact your Parish Council
Should
you wish to refer any decisions contained in these minutes to Policy and
Resources Committee, please submit a Decision Referral Form, signed by three
Councillors, to the Head of Policy and Communications by: 19
October 2018
MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
HERITAGE, CULTURE AND LEISURE COMMITTEE
Minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 2 October 2018
Present: |
Councillors Cox, Cuming, Fermor, Harper (Chairman), Hastie, Hinder, Mrs Hinder and Mrs Wilson |
|
|
55. Apologies for Absence
It was noted that apologies for absence had been received from Councillors Fort and Lewins.
56. Notification of Substitute Members
It was noted that Councillor Cox was substituting for Councillor Lewins.
57. Urgent Items
There were no urgent items.
58. Notification of Visiting Members
There were no Visiting Members.
59. Disclosures by Members and Officers
There were no disclosures by Members or Officers.
60. Disclosures of Lobbying
Councillors Fermor, Harper, Hastie and Mrs Wilson stated that they had been lobbied on Agenda Item 14 – Play Area Provision.
61. Exempt Items
RESOLVED: That the items on the agenda be taken in public as proposed.
62. Minutes of the meeting held on 4 September 2018
RESOLVED: That the Minutes of the meeting held on 4 September 2018 be signed as a correct record subject to the following insertion:-
Committee Work Programme
Details of Significant Anniversaries – this would be incorporate into the
Festivals and Events report due on 30th October.
63. Presentation of Petitions
There were no petitions.
64. Questions and answer session for members of the public
There were no questions from members of the public.
65. Committee Work Programme 2018/19
The Committee considered the Committee Work Programme for 2018/19.
The Chairman requested that a report be presented to the November meeting providing an update on the booking of sports pitches following concerns raised by a Member which related to Shepway Green.
66. Reference from Planning Committee - Provision of a Footway from the Leisure Centre Car Park to the Sports Pitches to the Rear of the Centre
The Committee considered a Reference from Planning Committee which related to a request for the provision of a footway from the Leisure Centre car park to the sports pitches to the rear of the centre.
Mrs Jennifer Shepherd, the Head of Environment and Public Realm advised that she had spoken to the Project Manager who confirmed that the footway could be incorporated within existing budgets.
RESOLVED: That the Committee approve the provision of a footway to create an access for the public by the side of the Park Maintenance building to the sports pitches to be paid for within existing budgets.
Voting: Unanimous
67. Change to the Order of Business
The Chairman advised that he intended to take Agenda Item 13 – Development of the New Strategic Plan at the end as this was likely to stimulate more debate due to its content.
68. Play Area Provision
Mrs Shepherd introduced her report which provided an update following the adoption of Maidstone’s Play Area Policy by the Committee in October 2017.
The Committee noted that £200,000 had been allocated to the Parish Grant Scheme to support improvements at Strategically Important Play Areas owned or operated by Parish Councils. Out of the 29 Parishes that were eligible for funding, 9 applications were received and had been successful for funding. The total amount requested was £86,500 and with match funding of £143,000 the scheme had generated £230,000 of improvements to Strategically Important Play Areas.
Due to there being a surplus in the budget, it was proposed that a second round of funding be undertaken to give those Parishes who did not submit an application previously to put in a bid for funding.
Mrs Shepherd advised that there were 20 MBC play areas which had been identified as non-strategically important and would be considered for decommissioning when the equipment comes to the end of its usable life. However, the Committee was advised that Officers would be contacting Ward Members and Parish Councils of those play areas to have an early discussion to consider alternative management arrangements for the site or request the Committee consider the future of their Non-Strategically Important Play Areas (NSIPAs).
It was noted that none of those on the list of NSIPAs would be closed for the next five years.
In response to questions from Members, Mrs Shepherd advised that:-
·
She would check with the Property Team to see how the transfer of
the ownership of Franklin Drive play area to Boxley Parish Council was
progressing.
·
If the Parish Council was to purchase a piece of play equipment,
the Council would carry out safety inspections and minor repairs but if there
were major repairs required then it would not carry these out.
In the proceeding discussion Members made the following comments:-
·
That one of the criterion for strategically important play areas
of being within a 12 minute walk to residents should be revisited.
·
That there are a number of densely populated areas and areas of
deprivation that do not have a play area and this should be further
investigated.
·
That if there was a strength of feeling from residents for a play
area in their area, a residents association or similar organisation could take
several years to form by which time it could be too late.
·
That any surplus from the underspend on the Parish Grant Scheme
should be ringfenced and used towards those non-strategically important play
areas.
RESOLVED:
1) That
the outcome of the Strategically Important Play Area (SIPA)
Parish Grant Scheme be noted.
2) That
a second round of funding, based on the previous criteria, for
the remaining budget be approved.
3) That
a pro-active approach to contacting Ward Members and Parish
Councils for areas with non-strategically important play areas (NSPAs) is
supported, in order to seek opportunities for further investment, third party
management of the sites or consideration of their decommissioning.
Voting: Unanimous
69. Museum Transformation Plan 6 month review
Ms Victoria Barlow, the Museum’s Director gave a presentation on the progress made during the last six months to the Museum Transformation Plan.
The Committee was informed that the action plan for 2018/19 focussed on two main areas of delivery, the transformation of the museum and the development of a new café at the eastern end of the building.
It was noted that the Museum currently reached about a third of the residents of the borough but wanted to engage with more communities and one of the ways it was achieving this was to run a series of Memory Days to enable people to tell their stories in order that the public could gain more insight into the past employment of the town, such as Trebor Bassett and the Paper industry.
A recent consultation on what visitors would like to see more of featured answers such as more dinosaurs, more disabled friendly activities, improved lighting upstairs, things that they could touch and pet horses.
In the ensuing discussion Members made the following comments:-
·
That the Museum should not just be limited to the history of
Maidstone.
·
That having a more tactile approach should be encouraged.
·
That the plans for the relocation of the Café were very exciting.
·
That governance arrangements need to be realigned, especially in
regard to the Museum’s Strategic Board. It was felt that this should be
reconstituted as an Advisory Board to advise on best practice.
·
That work should be undertaken to launch a fundraising campaign
to raise £5 million for the Museum.
In response to questions from Members, Ms Barlow advised:-
·
That discussions were being held with the various Trusts at the
Museum and it was progressing well.
·
Some of the fossils were billions of years old, and some of the
oldest exhibits donated to the Museum had come from the 1830’s.
RESOLVED:
1) That the review of
progress towards the completion of the 2018/19 Action Plan of the Museum’s 20
Year Plan be noted.
2) That the terms of
reference of the Museum’s Strategic Board be reviewed with a view to it
becoming an Advisory Board.
3) That a Fundraising
Campaign be commenced for the Museum.
Voting: Unanimous
70. Development of the New Strategic Plan
Mrs Alison Broom, the Chief Executive and Mrs Angela
Woodhouse, the Head of Policy, Communications and Governance presented a report
on the development of the new Strategic Plan.
The Committee was asked to consider the draft vision, objectives and outcomes
as set out in the report which would also be presented to the other Service
Committees during October.
The Committee made the following comments:-
Draft Vision/Objectives
|
Suggested Changes/Actions |
Comments/Clarity of Language |
Draft Vision – “A borough of opportunity that works for everyone that residents are proud to be part of |
“A borough of opportunity that works for everyone and that residents are proud to be part of” |
Something that embraces all of our communities e.g. diversity, visitors, workforces |
Objective 1 – Great Environmental Quality |
||
The borough’s bio-diversity and green corridors are improved |
“The borough’s bio-diversity is improved” |
The term ‘green corridors’ does not make provision for the waterways. Therefore this should be incorporated into the sub-text as the green and blue. |
More residents participate in taking care of the environment |
No change |
|
The carbon footprint of the borough is reduced |
No change |
Officers to feature trees more prominently in the sub-text The provision of more trees came out of the Member workshop and should be in the sub-text |
Everyone has access to high quality and attractive parks and green spaces |
No change |
|
More waste is treated locally and used as valuable resource |
“More waste is treated locally and used as a valuable resource |
Textual change |
A borough which is recognised as being clean and well cared for |
No change |
|
Objective 2 – Well Connected Safe and Empowered Communities |
||
A borough where more people feel safe |
Officers to change the wording |
Members felt that the wording as it stood suggested that people did not feel safe already. Officers to find a better form of words to reflect intention.
|
The harm caused by crime and anti-social behaviour is reduced |
No change |
|
More investment in community infrastructure |
No change |
Members felt that the Council needed to be creative in the use of funding activities not just infrastructure |
A diverse range of community activity enabled by the Council |
No change |
|
A borough with more neighbourhood plans |
No change |
|
Community creativity is encouraged and enabled |
No change |
Inclusion of use of S106 money as a how under outcomes.
|
|
|
Community based outcomes could be simplified to one or two outcomes |
Objective 3 – Embracing Growth |
||
New places are created that are well designed and connected |
No change |
That this means the development of infrastructure first should be created first should be more explicit |
The Council leads the master planning and invests in the creation of new places |
No change |
|
All new homes are built to a high quality of environmental and renewable building standards |
No change |
|
The housing need is met for all |
No change |
Officers to be more explicit about the difference between this and a decent home. |
Communities are engaged in planning growth of their place |
No change |
|
Objective 4 – Renowned for Heritage and Culture (should be changed to “Renowned for our Heritage and Culture) |
||
The value of tourism is increased |
That this should be under the objective for a thriving economy And/or use of heritage culture and arts to regenerate the economy |
|
Well established and promoted cultural quarter |
No change |
Make a judgement on whether we mention the Museum and others
|
A destination that hosts high quality festivals and events and celebrates diversity |
“A destination that promotes quality festivals and events and celebrates diversity, or put ‘a borough that celebrates its diversity’ into one of its own |
This incorporates the smaller events and takes focus off us having to start |
Increased resident participation in cultural and heritage activities |
“Increased participation in arts, leisure and sports and cultural heritage activities across all age groups |
Need to incorporate all activities |
|
|
Inclusion of new outcome ‘ A borough which celebrates its diversity’ to reflect all of maidstone’s communities |
Everyone knows we are the County town of Kent |
Officers to reword to incorporate Maidstone’s cultural offer across the borough |
Officers to speak to Head of Economic Development and Regeneration for a suitable change of words
|
|
|
It was noted that the museum wasn’t included in here but other sites were included elsewhere. Officers will review and decide that either all sites are included or no sites at all.
|
|
|
On the whole the Objective does not have enough emphasis on getting the people in the borough to have a pride and sense of place
|
Objective 5 – A Decent Home for Everyone (needs to change to “A Good Home for Everyone”) |
||
Homelessness and rough sleeping is prevented |
No change |
|
Residents have a decent home |
Officers to change the wording, homes need to be built fit for purpose – pick up the spirit of a ‘good’ home Members felt that a decent home did not illustrate this point well enough |
|
The borough has a range of housing type and tenure to meet residents needs |
No change |
|
The accommodation needs of the Gypsy and Traveller community are met |
No change |
|
We have enabled and delivered affordable housing |
No change |
|
Objective 6 – Better Transport Systems |
||
The transport system supports the growth in homes and jobs |
“The growth in homes and jobs are supported by an integrated transport system” |
Members felt that this needed to be more clearly defined |
Sustainable travel options are invested in and improved |
“Sustainable travel options are improved” |
Take out the word invested as it could be construed by the public that the Council would be providing the investment.
Investment should be included in the how. |
Greater joined up decision making for transport |
“More productive joined up decision making for transport, working with partners” |
To give greater clarity that the Council works with partners to achieve this.
Cycling to be included in the how. |
The air quality impacts of transport are reduced |
No change |
|
Objective 7 – People Fulfil their Potential |
||
Deprivation is reduced |
No change |
|
Skills levels and earning potential of our residents are raised |
Officers to specify adults and children to give more emphasise to education.
Overall education is missing. |
|
Health and well-being inequalities are reduced |
No change |
|
Social mobility is improved |
No change |
|
Objective 8 – A Thriving Economy |
||
Business start ups and survival rates are improved and we are the best in Kent |
Officers to reword the outcome to change the phrase ‘survival rate’
Quality apprenticeships should be reflected in the how.
Volunteering to be reflected in the how. |
|
A revitalised town centre |
“A revitalised county town and villages” |
|
Improved high speed broadband |
“Improved high speed broadband and future technology embraced digital infrastructure” |
|
The Kent Medical Campus is delivered |
For further consideration |
Members were not clear why this should be specifically mentioned and wanted this to be revisited in the round |
RESOLVED: That the comments on the draft vision, objectives and outcomes from this Committee be presented to Policy and Resources Committee as part of the development of the new Strategic Plan.
Voting: Unanimous
71. Duration of Meeting
6.30 p.m. to 8.45 p.m.