Contact your Parish Council
DEMOCRACY AND GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE |
3 JULY 2019 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
AUDIT, GOVERNANCE AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE – SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF NON-VOTING PARISH COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Final Decision-Maker |
Council |
|||||||
Lead Head of Service |
Angela Woodhouse, Head of Policy, Communications and Governance |
|||||||
Lead Officer and Report Author |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
|||||||
Classification |
Public
|
|||||||
Wards affected |
All |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Executive Summary |
||||||||
This report recommends a selection process for the appointment of non-voting Parish Council representatives on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, in the event of more than one candidate being nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy, and consequential amendments to the Council’s Constitution.
|
||||||||
Purpose of Report
Decision
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
This report makes the following recommendations to this Committee: |
||||||||
1. That the Council be recommended to agree that if more than one candidate is nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy in the office of non-voting Parish Council representative on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, the selection process outlined below be followed culminating in a recommendation being made to the Council:
Completion of an expression of interest form by each candidate in support of their nomination; and Interview by the Democracy and General Purposes Committee if appropriate.
2. That to facilitate this process, the Council be recommended to agree the following changes to the Constitution:
Part 2 – Responsibility for Functions
Section 2.2.9 – Democracy and General Purposes Committee
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Timetable |
||||||||
Meeting |
Date |
|||||||
Democracy and General Purposes Committee |
3 July 2019 |
|||||||
Council |
17 July 2019 |
|||||||
AUDIT, GOVERNANCE AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE – SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF NON-VOTING PARISH COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES |
|
1. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS
Issue |
Implications |
Sign-off |
Impact on Corporate Priorities |
The recommendations will not in themselves materially affect achievement of corporate priorities. However, they will support the Council’s overall achievement of its aims through improved governance arrangements.
|
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Cross Cutting Objectives |
The recommendations will have no impact on the cross cutting objectives. |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Risk Management |
See paragraph 5.1 below. |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Financial |
The proposals set out in the recommendations are all within already approved budgetary headings and so no new funding is required. Participation of the Parish Council representatives in the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee provides some independent input to the work of the Committee.
|
Section 151 Officer & Finance Team |
Staffing |
The recommendations if accepted will be delivered within current staffing resources. |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Legal |
Acceptance of the recommendations will provide a transparent and consistent selection process within the Council’s Constitution for the appointment of non-voting Parish Council representatives on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee in the event of more than one candidate being nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy.
|
Keith Trowell, Practice Area Team Leader – Corporate Governance |
Privacy and Data Protection |
Accepting the recommendations will increase the volume of data held by the Council. This data will be held and processed in accordance with the data protection principles contained in the Data Protection Act 2018 and in accordance with the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985.
|
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Equalities |
No
impact identified as a result of the recommendations set out in the report.
However, the individual needs of candidates will be considered as part of the
revised appointment process to ensure it remains equitable and accessible |
Equalities and Corporate Policy Officer |
Public Health
|
None identified. |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Crime and Disorder |
None identified. |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
Procurement |
None identified. |
Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer |
2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1 The Audit, Governance and Standards Committee now comprises nine Councillors plus two non-voting Parish Councillors appointed by the Council for a three year term of office.
2.2 The Hearing Panel, which is required to determine all complaints referred to it by the Monitoring Officer where a Member of a Council in the Borough is alleged to have breached their respective Councillors’ Code of Conduct under the provisions of the Localism Act 2011, now consists of three Councillors (plus one non-voting Parish Councillor when a Parish Councillor is the subject of the complaint) drawn from the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee.
2.3 Parish Council representatives are appointed by the Council upon the nomination of the Maidstone Area Committee of the Kent Association of Local Councils (KALC) and any other Parish Councils in the Borough that are not members of KALC.
2.4 The Council agreed at its meeting on 12 December 2018 that if more than one candidate is nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy in the office of non-voting Parish Council representative on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, then a selection process will be followed and the resulting candidate selected will be recommended to Council for appointment.
3. AVAILABLE OPTIONS
3.1 To do nothing, but the Council has agreed that if more than one candidate is nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy in the office of non-voting Parish Council representative on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, then a selection process will be followed and the resulting candidate selected will be recommended to Council for appointment.
3.2 To recommend to Council a selection process for the appointment of non-voting Parish Council representatives on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, in the event of more than one candidate being nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy, and consequential amendments to the Council’s Constitution.
4. PREFERRED OPTION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 It is proposed that the Council be recommended to agree that if more than one candidate is nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy in the office of non-voting Parish Council representative on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, the selection process outlined below be followed culminating in a recommendation being made to the Council:
Completion of an expression of interest form by each candidate in support of their nomination; and
Interview by the Democracy and General Purposes Committee if appropriate
4.2 It is further proposed that to facilitate this process, the Council be recommended to agree changes to the functions of the Democracy and General Purposes Committee which is already responsible for considering applications from persons wishing to act as Independent Persons in connection with Councillor and Statutory Officer conduct and to serve on the Independent Remuneration Panel, and making recommendations to Council to appoint such persons.
5. RISK
5.1 The risk is that the Council will be asked to make an important appointment with limited knowledge of the candidates, but the selection process will mitigate against this and inform the Council’s decision. The Council will still retain its right to not accept the recommendation of the Democracy and General Purposes Committee if it feels it appropriate to do so.
6. CONSULTATION RESULTS AND PREVIOUS COMMITTEE FEEDBACK
6.1 The Council has stipulated that if more than one candidate is nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy in the office of non-voting Parish Council representative on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee, then a selection process will be followed and the resulting candidate selected will be recommended to Council for appointment.
7. NEXT STEPS: COMMUNICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION
7.1 If the recommendations are agreed by the Committee and the Council, the amendments will be made to the Council’s Constitution and the selection process will be followed in the event of more than one candidate being nominated by Parish Councils to fill a vacancy in the office of non-voting Parish Council representative on the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee.
8. REPORT APPENDICES
None
9. BACKGROUND PAPERS
None