Contact your Parish Council


30 November 2021


The Future Use of Community Grant


Final Decision-Maker


Lead Head of Service

William Cornall

Director of Regeneration & Place

Lead Officer and Report Author

John Littlemore

Head of Housing & Community Services




Wards affected



Executive Summary


To consider whether the Council will continue to provide a Community Grant and if so, to consider how that grant should be utilised.


Purpose of Report





This report makes the following recommendations to this Committee:

1.   That the Committee agrees the Community Grant budget from the options set out in Paragraph 3.1.

2.   That the Committee adopts the approach outlined in Paragraph 3.2 of the report.







CHE Committee


The Future Use of Community Grant









Impact on Corporate Priorities

The four Strategic Plan objectives are:


         Embracing Growth and Enabling Infrastructure

         Safe, Clean and Green

         Homes and Communities

         A Thriving Place


Head of Housing & Community Services

Cross Cutting Objectives

The four cross-cutting objectives are:


         Heritage is Respected

         Health Inequalities are Addressed and Reduced

         Deprivation and Social Mobility is Improved

         Biodiversity and Environmental Sustainability is respected


Head of Housing & Community Services

Risk Management

The risks posed are within the Councilís risk-assessment appetite.


Head of Housing & Community Services


The proposals set out in the recommendation are all within already approved budgetary headings and so need no new funding for implementation.


Section 151 Officer & Finance Team


We will deliver the recommendations with our current staffing establishment.

Head of Housing & Community Services


Acting on the recommendations is within the Councilís powers.


Legal Team

Privacy and Data Protection

Accepting the recommendations will increase the volume of data held by the Council.  We will hold that data in line with our retention schedules.

         We recognise the recommendations will impact what personal information the Council processes and so have completed a separate data privacy impact assessment.

Policy and Information Team


We recognise the recommendations may have varying impacts on different communities within Maidstone.  Therefore, a separate equalities impact assessment will be completed depending on the decision of the Committee.

Policy & Information Manager

Public Health



We recognise that the recommendations will have a positive impact on population health or that of individuals.


Public Health Officer

Crime and Disorder

The recommendation will have a positive impact on Crime and Disorder, particularly regarding the mediation service. The Community Protection Team have been consulted and mitigation has been proposed


Head of Housing and Community Services


On accepting the recommendations, the Council will complete the sourcing of those services in line with financial procedure rules.

Head of Service & Section 151 Officer

Biodiversity and Climate Change

The implications of this report on biodiversity and climate change have been considered and are;

         There are no implications on biodiversity and climate change.


Biodiversity and Climate Change Officer






2.1     The CHE Committee has previously considered the Councilís position in relation to the grant funding that is provided to community groups. The amount of grant and the number of organisations that benefit from the funds has greatly reduced over the years. The matter was last considered by the CHE Committee on 17th January 2017, which led to the current arrangement being implemented from April 2017 ††


2.2     The CHE Committee agreed a five-year service level agreement to the benefit of the Maidstone Citizens Advice Bureau, Involve, and Maidstone Mediation. The overall budget has reduced by 5% per annum over the five-year period. A service level agreement was entered into with each organisation, setting out the expectation from both parties and outlining the outcomes anticipated from the grant.


2.3     The outgoing grant settlements were utilised to provide services that are not currently provided by the Council itself, or to supplement services by providing a more in-depth or greater level of expertise than is presently available within our own resources. These are summarised in the table below:



Service provided



Mediation in neighbour disputes; negotiating between family members in homeless cases; mediation services into schools; anger management courses.

Maidstone Mediation


Debt advice & assistance. Employment advice. Benefit advice incl. universal credit. Assistance with preventing homelessness Ė mortgage/rent arrears, illegal eviction. Consumer advice.

Citizens Advice Bureau

Community links

Act as a conduit between the Council & voluntary sector; maintain a directory of voluntary groups; lead and develop a range of forums (e.g. older persons; BME)†



2.4     The total budget in the final year of the current arrangement was £163,000 and the settlement to each organisation is as follows:


Maidstone CAB




Maidstone Mediation



This arrangement comes to an end on 31st March 2022 and the CHE Committee is asked to consider how it will utilise this budget going forward.†


2.5     The services provided by the voluntary sector reflect areas of activity that are not currently provided in-house by the Councilís own officers. The provision of these services by an external organisation has a number of benefits. These include:

         Those organisations having an expertise and knowledge that would otherwise need to be developed in-house.

         Voluntary sector groups are often seen as Ďtrusted bodiesí and independent of statutory agencies.

         This can be particularly helpful if the advice is related to action being taken by the Council e.g. Council Tax recovery.

         Voluntary organisations can draw upon knowledge developed in delivering other services e.g pension advice; social prescribing.


2.6     Attached as Appendix 1. are the activities tables for both the Maidstone Mediation service and the Maidstone Citizens Advice Bureau. All three organisations funded through the Community Grant were affected by the restrictions imposed by the Covid19 pandemic to a greater or lesser degree. As a result, the Council evolved some aspects of services previously delivered by the voluntary sector. An example of this would the merger of our respective lists of voluntary and community groups. The Policies, Communities and Engagement Team have agreed a biannual update meeting with Involve, as well as sending a quarterly update so they can maintain a smaller inhouse list of key community groups.

2.7     Maidstone Mediation remained open throughout the pandemic, they refocused and like many organisations worked virtually and safely. This enabled their clients to maintain full access to their services, particularly those needed to be able to cope during a time of stress, anxiety, frustration and feelings of loss of hope for many.


2.8     The Maidstone CAB also provided a range of services virtually. The focus of their work changed, with different issues becoming more in demand in response to what was happening within society more generally. For example, as the moratorium on property possession orders went into effect the need for housing advice reduced. However, this was offset by an increase in employment and debt advice as people tried to understand the impact of furlough and the associated concerns about income levels.††


2.9     The move to online services amongst all three funded organisations mirrors the feedback from the wider sector, recorded as part of the community groupsí Impact & Recovery Survey earlier this year. Although, it as noted that 26% of respondents said they had to temporarily suspend activities during the lockdown periods. Social isolation and mental health support featured highly in this survey as being areas of activity that were most called upon.


2.10  Advice was provided by the Councilís shared procurement team to the effect that this budget was no longer being utilised in the traditional grant role. In practice, the Council was seeking a supply of a service as it was entering into an agreement for specific work; and this was to be carried out over a sustained period. This means that if the Council wants to continue to provide this grant in this way, we will need to follow the Councilís financial rules.


2.11  Sums paid over a fixed term period are combined for the purpose of the financial rules. This means that if the Committee were to follow a similar breakdown of the grant in the future, a three-year grant settlement would mean that the awards for both the mediation service and community partnership service will require three written quotes. The larger debt and other advice grant will require a formal tendering process.









3.1     The Committee could choose to:


3.1.1      Remove the grant budget completely to be taken as a saving for the Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS). This would provide a significant contribution of £174,000 towards the savingís target.


3.1.2      Provide a three-year grant, reducing by a further 5% each year creating a saving of £8,700 per annum or £26,100 by the end of the three year period. This sum would contribute towards the MTFS saving target and the impact would be a tapered reduction spread over the period of the new settlement.


3.1.3      Provide a three-year grant without reducing the overall budget. This will provide the same level of funding for the supplier but would not contribute to the MTFS and would mean that savings would need to be found from other areas of activity.


3.2     The Committee could agree to continue to fund the voluntary sector in the provision of services for:

         A mediation service that MBC officers can make referrals to (7% of the overall budget).

         Debt advice & assistance. Employment advice. Benefit advice incl. universal credit. Assistance with preventing homelessness Ė mortgage/rent arrears, illegal eviction. Consumer advice (80% of the overall budget).

         Provide a lead role between the Council & voluntary sector; maintain a directory of voluntary groups; lead and develop a range of forums (e.g. older persons; BME) (13% of the overall budget).


This approach will require the Council to tender for those services, depending on the size of the relevant allotted budget.


3.3     The Committee could decide to utilise the whole grant for alternative proposals to be invited from the voluntary sector. In doing so the Committee will need to decide what objectives should be met by the grant settlement. The Impact & Recovery Survey provides a source of information that may assist Members if they choose to investigate this further. The relevant information is attached as Appendix 2.




4.1     The voluntary sector continues to provide a range of services that the Council would have to provide directly or decide that it no longer requires these to be delivered. The benefits from the links with the voluntary sector was brought into focus during the Covid19 pandemic. The Council remains under financial pressures over the period of the MTFS and there is a need to develop options for savings to mitigate this. For these reasons the preferred options are those contained in Paragraphs 3.1.2 and 3.2. †




5.       RISK

5.1    The recommendations are within the Councilís risk appetite. Voluntary groups expressed future funding as their highest concern within the Impact & Recovery Survey. Locally, we have seen the impact on organisations when local authority commissioned services result in the loss of finances. Whilst most organisations are resilient and are able to adjust over time, the loss of funding can in the short-term lead to disruption and fragility to those voluntary groups.





6.1     If the recommendations are approved, officers will commence the process of identifying local voluntary groups to obtain three written quotations for the mediation service and community sector lead role. The advice service will be tendered in accordance with the Councilís financial procedure rules.






Appendix 1 - Example of Activities

Appendix 2 - Impact & Recovery Survey Ė issues identified for Maidstone.






         CHE Committee report 17th January 2017

         Impact & Recovery Survey