Contact your Parish Council
Agenda and minutes
Venue: Town Hall, High Street, Maidstone
Contact: Caroline Matthews 01622 602743
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: There were no apologies for absence.
|
|
Notification of Substitute Members Minutes: There were no Substitute Members.
|
|
Urgent Items Minutes: There were no urgent items.
|
|
Notification of Visiting Members Minutes: Councillor Kimmance was present as a Visiting Member and indicated his wish to speak on Agenda Item 11 – Hackney Carriage Licence – Survey on Deregulation.
|
|
Disclosures by Members and Officers Minutes: There were no disclosures by Members and Officers.
Councillor Mrs Springett arrived at 6.33 p.m. as this item was being discussed.
|
|
Disclosures of Lobbying Minutes: All Members stated that they had been lobbied on Agenda Item 11 – Hackney Carriage Licence – Survey on Deregulation except for Councillors B Hinder and Mrs Hinder.
|
|
Exempt Items Minutes: RESOLVED: That all items be taken in public as proposed.
Councillor Mrs Sams arrived as this item was being discussed at 6.38 p.m.
|
|
Minutes of the Meeting Held on 29 March 2018 PDF 51 KB Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 29 March 2017 be approved as a correct record and signed. |
|
Minutes of the Meeting held on 22 May 2018 PDF 29 KB Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 22 May 2018 be approved as a correct record and signed.
|
|
Committee Work Programme 2018/19 PDF 26 KB Minutes: The Committee considered the Committee Work Programme.
It was noted that the last item on the table should read: Gambling Act 2005: Licence Fees 2019/20.
RESOLVED: That the Committee Work Programme be noted.
|
|
Hackney Carriage Licence – Survey on Deregulation PDF 104 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Mr John Littlemore, the Head of Housing and Community Services presented a report which set out the results of a 12 week consultation with stakeholders on three options for Hackney Carriage vehicle licences which were:-
1. Maintain the current limit on Hackney Carriage numbers; or 2. Issue any number of additional vehicle licences as appropriate; or 3. Remove the limit on Hackney Carriage numbers
The Committee noted that the survey had had 474 responses (which included 120 taxi drivers or representatives of taxi businesses). 59% of respondents indicated that 48 hackney carriage vehicles was about right.
In
response to questions from Members, Mr Littlemore stated
that:-
·
the
Committee had requested at its meeting on
1st December 2016 that a 12 week consultation be
undertaken on the three options for Hackney Carriage vehicle
licences with a view to a report back to the Committee at the
earliest opportunity. He also advised
that an Unmet Demand Survey was due to be undertaken in July 2019
that would highlight significant unmet demand should there be
any.
·
in
terms of a modal shift for transport, there was a
move to electric and hybrid vehicles and consideration of more taxi
provision being allowed into the town centre, rather than vehicles
coming into park in the town centre.
·
the
Council do not have the necessary powers to stop
taxis from other districts coming into the town centre. Any enforcement issues would have had to be
reported to the authority from where the licence was
issued.
·
if hackney carriage vehicles were to operate in the
town that are not licensed by this authority then they are required
to operate as a private hire vehicle, not a hackney carriage
vehicle. RESOLVED: That the results of the Hackney Carriage Licence Survey on Deregulation be noted.
|
|
Statement of Licensing Principles for Gambling Act 2005 2019 -2022 PDF 131 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered the report of Mr Littlemore which included a draft Statement of Licensing Principles for the Gambling Act 2005.
Mr Littlemore advised that it was a requirement of Section 349 of the Gambling Act 2005 for Licensing Authorities to prepare and publish a statement of licensing principles and it was proposed to carry out a 12 week consultation exercise on the proposed principles which would commence on 23 July 2018.
In
response to questions from Members, Mr Littlemore advised
that:-
·
although
the consultation period
would include the summer holidays, it would be for 12 weeks so it
would give people a reasonable time period to respond.
·
he
would ask the Communications Team if they could keep
promoting the consultation during the whole period.
·
the
consultation would be brought to the attention of
interested parties.
·
that
the ‘triggers’ set out in paragraph 6 of
the report were already in the Gambling Act and did not need to be
repeated in the policy. · that the last paragraph of the policy should be re-worded to emphasise the impact that problem gambling can have on health and wellbeing and how that relates to the Council.
RESOLVED:
1)
That the draft Gambling Act 2005 Statement of
Principles 2019-2022 is approved for public consultation.
2)
That
Officers be instructed to carry out
the consultation over a 12 week period.
|
|
Licensing Partnership Update Report PDF 85 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered the report of Mrs Sharon Bamborough, the Head of Licensing Partnership which outlined the performance of the Licensing Partnership.
Mrs Bamborough explained that the Partnership currently consisted of four authorities which were Maidstone, Sevenoaks, Tunbridge Wells Borough Councils and the London Borough of Bexley.
The Committee noted that the last year had been a particularly difficult one for the Partnership and the team as the Licensing Partnership Manager, Claire Perry had suddenly passed away.
Mrs Bamborough emphasised that despite the huge challenges of the past year, the officers had shown drive and determination not to see the service fail despite there being long term sickness, performance issues and staff vacancies.
It was noted that Maidstone’s performance had been generally good.
In response to questions from Members, Mrs Bamborough advised that:-
·
she
was not aware of any other Partnerships in the Kent
area of a similar size.
·
there were many advantages to being in the
Partnership, one was resilience as it allowed other teams to step
in when required, secondly there was a cross fertilisation of
ideas, sharing experiences and collaboration, and importantly not
working in isolation and; thirdly providing savings on economies of
scale, such as being able to deliver training sessions at a vastly
reduced rate which enabled more staff to be trained
effectively.
·
That the Licence Tracker had been taken down as it
relied on information being put on manually by staff which was
quite onerous on those already stretched resources. However, there was an app where anyone could
register for and search for a specific licence or even an
area. Mrs Bamborough also advised the Committee on the areas she was working on for the coming year, which included:-
KPIs – the key performance indicators focussed too much on speed not on quality and the work of the Senior Licensing Officer was not showcased. They will therefore change to give a bigger picture on what they do.
New I.T. System –
looking at a new management system which would produce a massive
benefit to the teams. Pre-App Advice –
investigating the possibility of providing paid for pre-app advice
on how to submit a good application. In
response to questions from Members, Mrs Bamborough advised
that:-
·
the
new animal licences would include dog breeding and
day care for dogs. However, she
undertook to advise all Members on whether it would include dog
training.
·
the
London Borough of Bromley were in talks with the
Partnership with a view to joining. · the new animal regulations are already included on the website.
The Committee asked Mrs Bamborough to pass on their thanks to the teams for continue to work in such challenging circumstances.
RESOLVED: That the performance of the Licensing Partnership be noted.
|
|
Duration of Meeting Minutes: 6.30 p.m. to 7.40 p.m.
|