Appendix A
Treasury Management Strategy Statement
Minimum Revenue Provision Policy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy
Maidstone Borough Council
2015/16
INDEX
1.3 Treasury Management Strategy for 2015/16
1.4 Treasury management consultants
2 THE CAPITAL PRUDENTIAL INDICATORS
2.2 The Council’s borrowing need (the Capital Financing Requirement)
2.3 Affordability prudential indicators
2.4 Incremental impact of capital investment decisions on council tax
3.1 Treasury Indicators: limits to borrowing activity
3.2 Prospects for interest rates
3.4 Policy on borrowing in advance of need
The Council is required to operate a balanced budget, which broadly means that cash raised during the year will meet cash expenditure. Part of the treasury management operation is to ensure that this cash flow is adequately planned, with cash being available when it is needed. Surplus monies are invested in low risk counterparties or instruments commensurate with the Council’s low risk appetite, providing adequate liquidity initially before considering investment return.
The second main function of the treasury management service is the funding of the Council’s capital plans. These capital plans provide a guide to the borrowing need of the Council, essentially the longer term cash flow planning to ensure that the Council can meet its capital spending obligations. This management of longer term cash may involve arranging long or short term loans, or using longer term cash flow surpluses. On occasion any debt previously drawn may be restructured to meet Council risk or cost objectives.
CIPFA defines treasury management as:
“The management of the local authority’s investments and cash flows, its
banking, money market and capital market transactions; the effective control of
the risks associated with those activities; and the pursuit of optimum
performance consistent with those risks.”
The Council is required to receive and approve, as a minimum, three main reports each year, which incorporate a variety of policies, estimates and actuals.
Prudential and treasury indicators and treasury strategy (this report) - The first, and most important report covers:
· the capital plans (including prudential indicators);
· a minimum revenue provision (MRP) policy (how residual capital expenditure is charged to revenue over time);
· the treasury management strategy (how the investments and borrowings are to be organised) including treasury indicators; and
· an investment strategy (the parameters on how investments are to be managed).
A mid year treasury management report – This will update members with the progress of the capital position, amending prudential indicators as necessary, and whether any policies require revision.
An annual treasury report – This provides details of a selection of actual prudential and treasury indicators and actual treasury operations compared to the estimates within the strategy.
Scrutiny - The above reports are required to be adequately scrutinised before being recommended to the Council. This role has previously been undertaken by the Audit Committee.
A quarterly update on the Council’s treasury management position is also provided through budget monitoring reports presented to Cabinet.
1.3 Treasury Management Strategy for 2015/16
The strategy for 2015/16 covers two main areas:
Capital issues
· the capital plans and the prudential indicators;
· the minimum revenue provision (MRP) policy.
Treasury management issues
· treasury indicators which limit the treasury risk and activities of the Council;
· prospects for interest rates;
· the borrowing strategy;
· policy on borrowing in advance of need;
· the investment strategy; and
· creditworthiness policy.
These elements cover the requirements of the Local Government Act 2003, the CIPFA Prudential Code, CLG MRP Guidance, the CIPFA Treasury Management Code and CLG Investment Guidance.
1.4 Treasury management consultants
The Council uses Capita Asset Services, Treasury solutions as its external treasury management advisors.
Responsibility for treasury management decisions ultimately remains within the organisation and officers will not place undue reliance on the advice of external service providers.
The terms of appointment and value gained through use of treasury management consultants will be subject to regular review.
The CIPFA Code requires the responsible officer to ensure that members with responsibility for treasury management receive adequate training in treasury management. This especially applies to members responsibe for scrutiny. A treasury management training session was delivered by Capita, the Council’s treasury management advisors in December 2014 and was open for all members to attend. Further training will be arranged as required.
The training needs of treasury management officers are also periodically reviewed.
2 THE CAPITAL PRUDENTIAL INDICATORS
The Council’s capital expenditure plans are the key driver of treasury management activity. The output of the capital expenditure plans is reflected in the prudential indicators, which are designed to assist members’ overview and confirm capital expenditure plans.
This prudential indicator is a summary of the Council’s capital expenditure plans, both those agreed previously, and those forming part of this budget cycle. Capital expenditure forecasts are shown below:
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
11,673 |
5,170 |
5,528 |
5,310 |
5,086 |
2.2 The Council’s borrowing need (the Capital Financing Requirement)
The second prudential indicator is the Council’s Capital Financing Requirement (CFR). The CFR is simply the total historic outstanding capital expenditure which has not yet been paid for from either revenue or capital resources. It is essentially a measure of the Council’s underlying borrowing need. Any capital expenditure above, which has not immediately been paid for, will increase the CFR.
The CFR does not increase indefinitely, as the minimum revenue provision (MRP) is a statutory annual revenue charge which broadly reduces the borrowing need in line with each assets life.
The CFR includes the liability for the arrangement with Serco Paisa for leisure centre improvements. Whilst these increase the CFR, and therefore the Council’s borrowing requirement, these types of scheme include a borrowing facility and so the Council is not required to separately borrow for these schemes.
CFR projections are shown in the table below:
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
-65 |
-2,033 |
-2,033 |
-2,033 |
-2,033 |
2.3 Affordability prudential indicators
The previous sections cover the overall capital and control of borrowing prudential indicators, but within this framework prudential indicators are required to assess the affordability of the capital investment plans. These provide an indication of the impact of the capital investment plans on the Council’s overall finances.
Ratio of financing costs to net revenue stream
This indicator identifies the trend in the cost of capital (borrowing and other long term obligation costs net of investment income) against the net revenue stream.
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
-1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
The estimates of financing costs include current commitments and the proposals in the 2015/16 budget report.
2.4 Incremental impact of capital investment decisions on council tax
This indicator identifies the revenue costs associated with proposed changes to the three year capital programme recommended in the 2015/16 budget report compared to the Council’s existing approved commitments and current plans. The assumptions are based on the budget, but will invariably include some estimates, such as the level of Government support, which are not published over a three year period.
Incremental impact of capital investment decisions on the band D council tax
|
2014/15 £ |
2015/16 £ |
2016/17 £ |
2017/18 £ |
2018/19 £ |
Council tax - band D |
1.20 |
4.4 |
4.42 |
4.34 |
4.21 |
The capital expenditure plans set out in Section 2 provide details of the service activity of the Council. The treasury management function ensures that the Council’s cash is organised in accordance with the the relevant professional codes, so that sufficient cash is available to meet this service activity. This will involve both the organisation of the cash flow and, where capital plans require, the organisation of approporiate borrowing facilities. The strategy covers the relevant treasury / prudential indicators, the current and projected debt positions and the annual investment strategy.
3.1 Treasury Indicators: limits to borrowing activity
The operational boundary. This is the limit beyond which external debt is not normally expected to exceed. In most cases, this would be a similar figure to the CFR, but may be lower or higher depending on the levels of actual debt.
Operational boundary |
2014/15 £000 |
2015/16 £000 |
2016/17 £000 |
2017/18 £000 |
Debt |
6,000 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
Other long term liabilities (Serco Pasia*) |
5,426 |
4,971 |
4,514 |
4,033 |
Total |
11,426 |
10,971 |
10,514 |
10,033 |
The authorised limit for external debt. A further key prudential indicator represents a control on the maximum level of borrowing. This represents a limit beyond which external debt is prohibited, and this limit needs to be set or revised by full Council. It reflects the level of external debt which, while not desired, could be afforded in the short term, but is not sustainable in the longer term.
1. This is the statutory limit determined under section 3 (1) of the Local Government Act 2003. The Government retains an option to control either the total of all councils’ plans, or those of a specific council, although this power has not yet been exercised.
2. The Council is asked to approve the following authorised limit:
Authorised limit |
2014/15 £000 |
2015/16 Estimate |
2016/17 Estimate |
2017/18 Estimate |
Debt |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
Other long term liabilities (Serco Pasia*) |
5,426 |
4,971 |
4,514 |
4,033 |
Total |
15,426 |
14,971 |
14,514 |
14,033 |
* Other Long Term Liabilities is the same for Operational Boundary and Authorised Limit due to no additional liabilities being incurred during 2015/16.
3.2 Prospects for interest rates
The Council’s advisors, Capita Asset Services, have provided the following interest rate forecast:
Annual Average % |
Bank Rate % |
PWLB Borrowing Rates % (including certainty rate adjustment) |
||
|
|
5 year |
25 year |
50 year |
Mar 2015 |
0.50 |
2.20 |
3.40 |
3.40 |
Jun 2015 |
0.50 |
2.20 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
Sep 2015 |
0.50 |
2.30 |
3.70 |
3.70 |
Dec 2015 |
0.75 |
2.50 |
3.80 |
3.80 |
Mar 2016 |
0.75 |
2.60 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
Jun 2016 |
1.00 |
2.80 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
Sep 2016 |
1.00 |
2.90 |
4.30 |
4.30 |
Dec 2016 |
1.25 |
3.00 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
Mar 2017 |
1.25 |
3.20 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
Jun 2017 |
1.50 |
3.30 |
4.60 |
4.60 |
Sep 2017 |
1.75 |
3.40 |
4.70 |
4.70 |
Dec 2017 |
1.75 |
3.50 |
4.70 |
4.70 |
Mar 2018 |
2.00 |
3.60 |
4.80 |
4.80 |
These rates are also reflected in the corresponding reduction in short term PWLB lending rates.
The Council is currently maintaining an under-borrowed position. This means that the capital borrowing need (the Capital Financing Requirement), has been funded using cash supporting the Council’s reserves, balances and cash flow as a temporary measure, rather than through loan debt. This strategy is prudent as currently investment returns are low and counterparty risk is relatively high.
The authority to borrow up to £6m for the financing of capital expenditure is included in the current capital programme and the current prudential indicators. The 2015/16 strategy includes the continuation of that authority within the calculation of the indicators. If the Council is to borrow then the affordability of the capital programme must include an assessment of the cost of borrowing along with the loss of investment income from the use of capital resources held in cash.
Should rates move more quickly than the forecast predicts, the current and proposed strategies do allow the Head of Finance and Resources to take advantage of external borrowing. The Council’s policy on borrowing in advance of need is set out at section 3.4 of this strategy.
The current long term borrowing rate from the Public Works Loan Board is 3.4% for 25 years. Were the Council to temporarily borrow the necessary resources from its own cash balances rather than complete a further one year investment it would save the equivalent of 2.7% of the amount borrowed. The affordability of the capital programme has been calculated based upon the assumption that internal borrowing would occur initially.
3.4 Policy on borrowing in advance of need
The Council will not borrow more than or in advance of its needs purely in order to profit from the investment of the extra sums borrowed. Any decision to borrow in advance will be within forward approved Capital Financing Requirement estimates, and will be considered carefully to ensure that value for money can be demonstrated and that the Council can ensure the security of such funds.
Risks associated with any borrowing in advance activity will be subject to prior appraisal and subsequent reporting through the mid-year or annual reporting mechanism.
The Council’s investment policy has regard to the CLG’s Guidance on Local Government Investments (“the Guidance”) and the revised CIPFA Treasury Management in Public Services Code of Practice and Cross Sectoral Guidance Notes (“the CIPFA TM Code”). The Council’s investment priorities will be security first, liquidity second, then return.
In accordance with the above guidance from the CLG and CIPFA, and in order to minimise the risk to investments, the Council applies minimum acceptable credit criteria in order to generate a list of highly creditworthy counterparties which also enables diversification and thus avoidance of concentration risk.
The council will maintain a counterparty list to identify institutions suitable for investment. The counterparty list will be maintained using the following principles:
a) Use of the Council’s Treasury Management Consultant’s scheme for rating of institutions for creditworthiness which uses a sophisticated modeling approach with credit rating agencies, Moodys, Fitch and Standard & Poors, along with Sovereign ratings, CDS spreads and credit watches.
b) Group limits placed on institutions within the same group and not separate for each institution. The group limit will be the highest individual credit criteria for the group.
c) An institution will never have a higher credit rating than the sovereign country it operates within. If the sovereign is downgraded below the rating of an institution, the institution is downgraded to the same level.
d) Duration limits with part nationalised is 2 years.
e) Use of the top 5 Building Societies is ranked using the management expenses and asset size ranking.
f) The Head of Finance & Resources will have been given delegated responsibility to add or withdraw institutions from the counterparty list when ratings change, either as advised by Capita Assets Services (the Council’s advisors) or from another reliable market source.
The DCLG provides criteria for specified investments with all other investments being non-specified. The following principles are applied to their use:
a) Only the top five building societies (with the exception of Nationwide Building Society) and investments over a 1 year duration with a credit worthy institution will be non-specified.
b) Funds will be invested short term (up to one year) so that funds are available to invest when rates increase.
c) The use of an additional £3m core cash deposits for greater than one year (bringing maximum total long term investments to £8m) if rates are at a premium over predicted base rates and funds are available for the term, with the potential to invest within property funds.
d) The use of enhanced cash funds and Money Market Funds which are AAA rated funds. These funds spread the risk over many counterparties and funds may be withdrawn by giving a short notice period.
e) The use of overseas banks to be included which are on Capita Asset Services counterparty list and whose country sovereignty rating is the same or higher than the UK.
The criteria for providing a pool of high quality investment counterparties (both specified and non-specified investments) are:
SPECIFIED INVESTMENTS: All such investments will be sterling denominated, with maturities up to maximum of 1 year, meeting the minimum ‘high’ quality criteria where applicable.
NON-SPECIFIED INVESTMENTS: These are any investments which do not meet the specified investment criteria.
A variety of investment instruments will be used, subject to the credit quality of the institution, and depending on the type of investment made it will fall into one of the above categories.
The criteria, time limits and monetary limits applying to institutions or investment vehicles are set out below:
|
* Minimum credit criteria / colour band |
** Max % of total investments/ £ limit per institution |
Max. maturity period |
Debt Management Account Deposit Facility (DMDAF) – UK Government |
N/A |
100% |
6 months |
UK Government gilts |
UK sovereign rating |
|
2 years |
UK Government Treasury blls |
UK sovereign rating |
|
2 years |
Bonds issued by multilateral development banks |
UK sovereign rating |
|
6 months |
Money market funds |
AAA |
100% |
Liquid |
Enhanced money market funds with a credit score of 1.25 |
AAA |
100% |
Liquid |
Enhanced money market funds with a credit score of 1.5 |
AAA |
100% |
Liquid |
Local authorities |
N/A |
100% |
2 years |
Term deposits with banks and building societies |
Yellow Purple Blue Orange Red Green No Colour |
|
Up to 2 years Up to 2 years Up to 2 years Up to 1 year Up to 6 Months Up to 100 days Top 5 Building societies only |
CDs or corporate bonds with banks and building societies |
Yellow Purple Blue Orange Red Green No Colour |
|
Up to 2 years Up to 2 years Up to 2 years Up to 1 year Up to 6 Months Up to 100 days Top 5 Building |
Corporate bond funds |
|
|
|
Gilt funds |
UK sovereign rating |
|
|
Property funds |
|
|
|
SPECIFIED INVESTMENTS:
(All such investments will be sterling denominated, with maturities up to maximum of 1 year, meeting the minimum ‘high’ rating criteria where applicable)
|
* Minimum ‘High’ Credit Criteria |
Use |
Debt Management Agency Deposit Facility |
-- |
In-house |
Term deposits – local authorities |
-- |
In-house |
Term deposits – banks and building societies ** |
Capita Green Rating |
In-house |
Term deposits with nationalised banks and banks and building societies
|
* Minimum Credit Criteria |
Use |
UK part nationalised banks |
Capita Blue Rating |
In-house |
Banks part nationalised by high credit rated (sovereign rating) countries – non UK |
Sovereign rating AA+ |
In-house |
Collateralised deposit (see note 2) |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house |
Certificates of deposit issued by banks and building societies covered by UK Government (explicit) guarantee |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house |
UK Government Gilts |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house buy and hold |
Bonds issued by multilateral development banks |
AAA |
In-house buy and hold |
Bond issuance issued by a financial institution which is explicitly guaranteed by the UK Government (refers solely to GEFCO - Guaranteed Export Finance Corporation) |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house buy and hold |
Sovereign bond issues (other than the UK govt) |
AAA |
In-house buy and hold |
Treasury Bills |
UK sovereign rating |
In house |
Collective Investment Schemes structured as Open Ended Investment Companies (OEICs): - |
||
1. Government Liquidity Funds |
Capita Yellow Rating |
In-house |
2. Money Market Funds |
Capita Yellow Rating |
In-house |
3. Enhanced Money Market Funds with a credit score of 1.25 |
Capita Dark Pink Rating |
In-house |
4. Enhanced Money Market Funds with a credit score of 1.5 |
Capita Light Pink Rating |
In-house |
5. Bond Funds |
AAA |
In-house |
6. Gilt Funds |
AAA |
In-house |
NON-SPECIFIED INVESTMENTS A maximum of 25% will be held in aggregate in non-specified investment
1. Maturities of ANY period
|
* Minimum Credit Criteria |
Use |
Fixed term deposits with variable rate and variable maturities: -Structured deposits |
Capita Green Rating |
In-house |
Term deposits with unrated counterparties : any maturity |
Top five Building Societies based on a combination of Asset size and Man Exp |
In-house |
Commercial paper issuance covered by a specific UK Government (explicit) guarantee |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house |
Commercial paper other |
|
In-house |
Corporate bonds |
* Short-term __, Long-term __, Viability __, Support __ |
In-house |
Other debt issuance by UK banks covered by UK Government (explicit) guarantee |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house |
Property fund: the use of these investments would constitute capital expenditure |
-- |
In house |
2. Maturities in excess of 1 year
|
* Minimum Credit Criteria |
Use |
Max. maturity period |
|
|
Term deposits – local authorities |
-- |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
Term deposits – banks and building societies |
Capita Blue Rating |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
Certificates of deposit issued by banks and building societies covered by UK Government (explicit) guarantee |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house |
2yrs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit issued by banks and building societies |
Capita Blue Rating |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
UK Government Gilts |
UK sovereign rating |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
Bonds issued by multilateral development banks |
AAA |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
Sovereign bond issues (other than the UK govt) |
AAA |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
Collective Investment Schemes structured as Open Ended Investment Companies (OEICs) |
|||||
1. Bond funds |
AAA |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
2. Gilt funds |
AAA |
In-house |
2 yrs |
|
|
Accounting treatment of investments.
The accounting treatment may differ from the underlying cash transactions arising from investment decisions made by this Council. To ensure that the Council is protected from any adverse revenue impact, which may arise from these differences, we will review the accounting implications of new transactions will be reviewed before they are undertaken.
This Council employs the creditworthiness service provided by Capita Asset Services. This service uses a modelling approach utilising credit ratings from the three main credit rating agencies - Fitch, Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. The credit ratings of counterparties are used in conjunction with the following information:
- credit watches and credit outlooks from credit rating agencies;
- credit default swap, an insurance policy to cover the lender for the risk of a borrower defaulting on a loan, is monitored to reflect the risk within a counterparty’s rating;
- sovereign ratings to select counterparties from only the most creditworthy countries (AA+ or above).
The end product is a series of colour coded bands which indicate the relative creditworthiness of counterparties. These colour codes are used by the Council to determine the suggested duration for investments, with the following exceptions:
1. The suggested maximum duration for semi nationalised UK Banks is 1 year. This council’s treasury management strategy enables investments with these institutions for up to 2 years, as previously agreed as part of the 2014/15 strategy.
2. The council’s treasury management strategy allows the use of the top 5 Building Societies (some falling into the ‘no-colour’ category based on the Capita bandings). Ranking will be based on the management expenses and asset size ranking.
The Council will therefore use counterparties within the following durational bands:
- Yellow 5 years
· Dark pink 5 years for Enhanced money market funds (EMMFs) with a credit score of 1.25
· Light pink 5 years for Enhanced money market funds (EMMFs) with a credit score of 1.5
- Purple 2 years
- Blue 2 years (only applies to nationalised or semi nationalised UK Banks)
- Orange 1 year
- Red 6 months
- Green 100 days
- No colour not to be used (except for the top 5 Building Societies ranked using the management expenses and asset size)
Based on these criteria, the current counterparty list is as follows:
Maximum Deposit |
Suggested Term |
|
UK Institutions |
||
Bank of Scotland Plc |
£8m |
24 mths |
Lloyds Bank Plc |
£8m |
24 mths |
National Westminster Bank Plc |
£8m |
24 mths |
The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc |
£8m |
24 mths |
Coventry BS |
£2m |
Building Society - 6 mths |
Leeds BS |
£2m |
Building Society - 6 mths |
Skipton BS |
£2m |
Building Society - 6 mths |
Yorkshire BS |
£2m |
Building Society - 6 mths |
Close Brothers Ltd |
£3m |
100 days |
MBNA Europe Bank |
£3m |
100 days |
Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
HSBC Bank plc |
£5m |
12 mths |
Standard Chartered Bank |
£5m |
12 mths |
Nationwide BS |
£3m |
6 mths |
Abbey National Treasury Services plc |
£3m |
6 mths |
Barclays Bank plc |
£3m |
6 mths |
Cater Allen |
£3m |
6 mths |
Merrill Lynch International |
£3m |
6 mths |
Santander UK plc |
£3m |
6 mths |
Collateralised LA Deposit* |
£5m |
60 mths |
Debt Management Office |
£5m |
60 mths |
Supranationals |
£5m |
60 mths |
UK Gilts |
£5m |
60 mths |
Overseas Institutions |
||
Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale |
£3m |
100 days |
Silicon Valley Bank |
£3m |
100 days |
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia |
£5m |
12 mths |
National Australia Bank Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
Westpac Banking Corporation |
£5m |
12 mths |
Bank of Montreal |
£5m |
12 mths |
Bank of Nova Scotia |
£5m |
12 mths |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce |
£5m |
12 mths |
Royal Bank of Canada |
£5m |
12 mths |
Toronto Dominion Bank |
£5m |
12 mths |
Nordea Bank Finland plc ~ |
£5m |
12 mths |
Pohjola Bank |
£5m |
12 mths |
DZ Bank AG (Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank) |
£5m |
12 mths |
The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank BA (Rabobank Nederland) |
£5m |
12 mths |
Qatar National Bank |
£5m |
12 mths |
Samba Financial Group |
£5m |
12 mths |
DBS Bank Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
Oversea Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
United Overseas Bank Ltd |
£5m |
12 mths |
Nordea Bank AB |
£5m |
12 mths |
Svenska Handelsbanken AB |
£5m |
12 mths |
Bank of New York Mellon, The |
£5m |
12 mths |
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. |
£5m |
12 mths |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA |
£5m |
12 mths |
Northern Trust Company |
£5m |
12 mths |
State Street Bank and Trust Company |
£5m |
12 mths |
U.S. Bancorp |
£5m |
12 mths |
Wells Fargo Bank NA |
£5m |
12 mths |
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank |
£5m |
24 mths |
NRW.BANK |
£5m |
24 mths |
Banque et Caisse d'Epargne de l'Etat |
£5m |
24 mths |
Clearstream Banking |
£5m |
24 mths |
Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten |
£5m |
24 mths |
Nederlandse Waterschapsbank N.V |
£5m |
24 mths |
Macquarie Bank Limited |
£3m |
6 mths |
BNP Paribas Fortis |
£3m |
6 mths |
KBC Bank NV |
£3m |
6 mths |
National Bank of Canada |
£3m |
6 mths |
Danske Bank |
£3m |
6 mths |
BNP Paribas |
£3m |
6 mths |
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank |
£3m |
6 mths |
Credit Industriel et Commercial |
£3m |
6 mths |
Credit Agricole SA |
£3m |
6 mths |
Societe Generale |
£3m |
6 mths |
BayernLB |
£3m |
6 mths |
Deutsche Bank AG |
£3m |
6 mths |
Landesbank Baden Wuerttemberg |
£3m |
6 mths |
Landesbank Berlin AG |
£3m |
6 mths |
Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen Girozentrale (Helaba) |
£3m |
6 mths |
ING Bank NV |
£3m |
6 mths |
DnB Bank |
£3m |
6 mths |
Arab National Bank |
£3m |
6 mths |
Riyad Bank |
£3m |
6 mths |
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB |
£3m |
6 mths |
Swedbank AB |
£3m |
6 mths |
Credit Suisse AG |
£3m |
6 mths |
UBS AG |
£3m |
6 mths |
Citibank International Plc ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Credit Suisse International ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Goldman Sachs International ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Goldman Sachs International Bank ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Ltd ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
UBS Ltd ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Bank of America, N.A.~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
BOKF, NA |
£3m |
6 mths |
Citibank, N.A. ~ |
£3m |
6 mths |
Money market Funds AAA Rated |
£8m |
60 mths |
Cash Enhanced Funds AAA Rated |
£8m |
60 mths |
|
||
As well as limits on the amount of funds that can be placed with individual counterparties, Capita would suggest imposing group limits. The group limit should be equal to the individual limit of one counterparty within the same group.
All credit ratings will be monitored daily. The Council is alerted to changes to ratings of all three agencies through its use of Capita’s creditworthiness service.
· if a downgrade results in the counterparty / investment scheme no longer meeting the Council’s minimum criteria, its further use as a new investment will be withdrawn immediately.
· in addition to the use of credit ratings the Council will be advised of information in movements in credit default swap spreads against the iTraxx benchmark and other market data on a weekly basis. A credit default swap is an insurance policy to cover the lender for the risk of a borrower defaulting on a loan. Monitoring this market, the credit risk of any particular counterparty can be assessed and appropriate action can be taken to reflect this risk within a counterparty’s rating. Extreme market movements may result in downgrade of an institution or removal from the Council’s lending list.
Sole reliance will not be placed on the use of this external service. In addition this Council will also use market data and market information, information on sovereign support for banks and the credit ratings of that supporting government.
The Council has determined that it will only use approved counterparties from countries with a minimum sovereign credit rating of AA+ from Fitch. The list of countries that qualify using this credit criteria as at the date of this report are shown above at 4.2. This list will be added to, or deducted from, by officers should ratings change in accordance with this policy.
In-house funds. Investments will be made with reference to the core balance and cash flow requirements and the outlook for short-term interest rates (i.e. rates for investments up to 12 months).
Capita Asset Services has revised its Interest Rate Forecast. Previously, it was thought that rates would increase in June 2015, however it looks like this will now be either late 2015 or early 2016. This has reduced investment rates. Current investment rates are as follows:
• Instant Access 0.40%
• 3 months 0.50%
• 6 months 0.65%
• 1 year 0.95%
• 2 years 1.25%
• 5 years 1.85%
Investment treasury indicator and limit - total principal funds invested for greater than 364 days. These limits are set with regard to the Council’s liquidity requirements and to reduce the need for early sale of an investment, and are based on the availability of funds after each year-end.
The Council is asked to approve the treasury indicator and limit: -
Maximum principal sums invested > 364 days |
|||
|
2015/16 £000 |
2016/17 £000 |
2017/18 £000 |
Principal sums invested > 364 days |
8,000 |
8,000 |
8,000 |