MAIDSTONE
BOROUGH COUNCIL
JOINT INDEPENDENT REMUNERATION PANEL
15 JANUARY 2015
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF POLICY & COMMUNICATIONS
Report
prepared by Caroline Matthews
1.
Introduction and Background
The meeting of the Joint Independent Remuneration Panel for Maidstone and Swale
Borough Councils has been called for 15 January 2015 following an annual
request from Democratic Services Officers to Members of the Council and Parish
Councils which asks if they have any issues relating to Members’ Allowances
that they would like the Panel to consider.
Swale Borough Council have indicated that they do not have any issues
themselves and will not be participating at this time.
Therefore the Panel for Maidstone consists of the following members:
Mark Palmer, South East Employers Representative and Chairman
Athos Loucas, Loucas Chartered Accountants, Representative from Chamber of
Commerce
Steve Golding, Maidstone Independent Representative
The Panel will be supported by:
Sandra Marchant, Democratic Services Manager
Caroline Matthews, Democratic Services Officer
2. Borough
Council Issues Raised for 2015
There are two issues that the Council would like the Panel to
consider:-
Group Leaders Allowance
A Councillor has requested that the Panel consider reverting back to the 2012
Scheme whereby Political Group Leaders of two or more Members would receive an
allowance as a proportion of the total number of Councillors (i.e. 55
Councillors). Attached at Appendix 1 is the Scheme as at 1.4.12).
In 2013 the Scheme was changed to:-
Leader of the Opposition (min of 10 Councillors) (receiving 25% of the Leader’s
Allowance) which equates to £5,831 per annum.
Group Leaders (min of 5 councillors) (receiving 10% of the Leader’s Allowance)
which equates to £2,331 per annum.
Attached at Appendix 2 is the Scheme adopted in January 2013.
At the meeting of the Panel in January 2013 it was noted that there was no
formal recognition of the role of the Leader of the Opposition and having noted
the Job Description, a copy of which is attached at Appendix 3, detailing the
role and responsibilities of the Leader of the Opposition, the Panel endorsed
the recommendation as set out above.
Immediately prior to May 2014 there were only three main political groups,
namely Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Independents as the Labour Party
only had one Member, so that was not constituted as a Group.
Since May 2014 there has been a change to the Political structure of the
Council and there are now 5 Political Parties, the composition of which is as
follows:-
Conservatives – 24
Liberal Democrats – 20
Independent – 5
UKIP – 4
Labour – 2
If the Council reverted to the Scheme set out in 2012, there was a stipulation
that a Political Group was set at a minimum of 2 members, rather than a minimum
of 5 Members as it stands now.
It is proposed that the change would be cost neutral. (Although whilst the Group
Leader of the Independent Party is Chair of an Overview & Scrutiny
Committee she will not be claiming her special allowance for Group Leader which
would be a saving on the budget).
The Councillor has also proposed that whatever percentage the Council staff get
in terms of a wage rise, should also be linked into the Members’ allowances.
RECOMMENDED: That the Panel consider the following options and
make a recommendation to Council:-
a) to agree to revert back to the Scheme as set out in 2012
(Appendix 1) whereby Group Leaders (other than the Leader)
receive a proportion of the agreed budget based upon how many
they have in their party;
b) to agree a rise on Members Allowances linked
to any staff rise in
salary on an annual basis;
c) make no change to the revised Scheme as amended in 2013
(Appendix 2) to the Leader of the Opposition and Group Leaders
allowances; or
d) defer a decision on this until the full review has been carried out
by the Panel in April 2015 to take into account the new governance
arrangements.
Special Allowance for Vice-Chairmen of Committees
The Licensing Committee and Licensing Act 2003 Committee have recently
amalgamated and at their inaugural meeting in September 2014 they asked that
the Panel consider a special allowance for Vice-Chairmen of all Committees.
Historically the Council has not given such an allowance to Vice-Chairmen but
to assist with your consideration of this proposal, set out below is a brief
analysis of what allowances some other Councils in Kent give for Vice-Chairmen,
if any:-
Ashford
Vice Chairman for Overview & Scrutiny = £1,928.61 (the Chair gets
£5,785.82)
Vice Chairman for Audit Committee = £1,607.17 (the Chair gets £4,821.51)
Vice Chairman for Planning = £1,928.61 (the Chair
gets £5,785.82)
Vice Chairman of Joint Transportation Board = £1,446.45 (the Chair gets the
same)
Swale
No special allowances for Vice-Chairmen
Tunbridge Wells
Vice Chairman for Planning = £1,320 (the Chair gets £5,500)
Tonbridge & Malling
Vice-Chair of Area Planning Committee = £1,269 (the Chair gets £5,076)
Vice-Chair of Overview & Scrutiny Committee = £1,269 (the Chair gets
£5,076)
Vice-Chair of Audit Committee = £635 (the Chair gets £2,538)
Vice-Chair of Licensing & Appeals = £635 (the Chair gets £2,538)
Vice-Chair of Standards & Training = £635 (the Chair gets £2,538)
Vice-Chair of General Purposes Committee = £317 (the Chair gets £1,269)
Vice-Chair of programmed Advisory Board = £317 (the Chair gets £1,269)
Vice-Chair of non-programmed Advisory Board = £127 (the Chair gets £508)
RECOMMENDED: That the Panel consider the following options and
make a recommendation to Council:-
a) that the provision of a special allowance for Vice-Chairmen
should be made in principle but that the actual costings should be
deferred until April 2015 when the Panel meet again to carry out a
full review to take account the new governance arrangements and
available budget; or
b) that a special allowance for Vice-Chairmen
should not be
considered.
3. Parish
Council Issues Raised for 2015
Boxley Parish Council
Boxley Parish Council have requested that you endorse an automatic 1% rise in
the Parish Councillor and Chairman’s allowances (currently £500 and £610
respectively) to be built into the draft budget for next year which they can
opt out of as individuals if they so wish.
RECOMMENDED: That the Panel consider this issue and decide if
they wish to endorse the proposal.