HERITAGE, CULTURE AND LEISURE COMMITTEE |
5 January 2016 |
||||
Is the final decision on the recommendations in this report to be made at this meeting? |
Yes |
||||
|
|||||
Reference from Policy and Resources Committee – Destination Management Plan |
|||||
|
|||||
Final Decision-Maker |
Heritage, Culture and Leisure Committee |
||||
Lead Head of Service |
Paul Riley, Head of Finance and Resources |
||||
Lead Officer and Report Author |
Caroline Matthews, Democratic Services Officer |
||||
Classification |
Public |
||||
Wards affected |
|
||||
|
|
||||
This Reference makes the following recommendations to this Committee:- |
|||||
1.
That
the following Members be confirmed as the Policy and Resources Committee’s
approved representatives for the Task and Finish Groups:- a) Working Group 1 – River Access Voting:
For: 13 Against: 0 Abstentions: 1 b) Working Group 2 – County Town
Voting:
For: 14 Against: 0 Abstentions: 0 c) Working Group 3 – Events
Voting: For: 14 Against: 0 Abstentions: 0 d)
Working
Group 4 – The Countryside
|
|||||
|
|
||||
This report relates to the following corporate priorities: |
|||||
· Keeping Maidstone Borough an attractive place for all · Securing a successful economy for Maidstone Borough
|
|||||
|
|
||||
Timetable |
|||||
Meeting |
Date |
||||
Heritage, Culture and Leisure Committee |
5 January 2016 |
||||
Reference from the Policy and Resources Committee – Destination Management Plan |
|
1. PURPOSE OF REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 To consider the resolution made by Policy and Resources Committee.
2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1 At its meeting on 25 November 2015 the Policy and Resources Committee considered the Reference from the Heritage, Culture and Leisure Committee which recommended that Members of the Policy and Resources Committee confirm their Committee’s approved representatives, to be co-opted onto any of the Task and Finish Groups when required for specific tasks relating to the Policy and Resources Committee’s remit or decisions, as and when the members of the Task and Finish Group see fit.
2.2 The Policy and Resources Committee, having chosen their representatives for the four Task and Finish Groups, were keen to provide a substitute Member as well in the event that the first Member could not attend.