AUDIT, GOVERNANCE AND

STANDARDS COMMITTEE

26 July 2022

 

Fraud and Compliance Team Update 2020-21 and 2021-22

 

Final Decision-Maker

Audit Governance and Standards Committee

Lead Head of Service

Georgia Hawkes

Mid Kent Services Director

Lead Officer and Report Author

Zoe Kent, Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Classification

Public

Wards affected

All

 

Executive Summary

 

To update the Committee on work undertaken by the Revenues and Benefits Fraud & Compliance team for the financial years 2020-21 and 2021-22.

Purpose of Report

 

Noting

 

 

This report makes the following recommendations to this Committee:

1.   That the contents of the report are noted.

 

 

Timetable

Meeting

Date

Audit, Governance and Standards Committee

26 July 2022

Fraud and Compliance Team Update 2020-21



Fraud and Compliance Team Update 2020-21 and 2021-22

 

1.       CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS

 

 

Issue

Implications

Sign-off

Impact on Corporate Priorities

We do not expect the recommendations will by themselves materially affect the achievement of the corporate priorities.

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Cross Cutting Objectives

None

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Risk Management

This report is presented for information only and has no risk management implications.

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Financial

The Fraud & Compliance team receives funding from Kent County Council of £150,040 (on expected 3:1 savings). The cost to Maidstone Borough Council for the service is £28,894

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Staffing

There are no changes to staffing proposed in this report.

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Legal

It is a function of the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee to monitor the effectiveness of the Council’s counter-fraud and corruption strategy.

This report provides an update on the work undertaken by the Revenues and Benefits Fraud & Compliance team.

There is no statutory duty to report regularly to committee on the team’s performance. However, under Section 3 of the Local Government Act 1999 (as amended) a best value authority has a statutory duty to secure continuous improvement in the way in which its functions are exercised having regard to a combination of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. Reports on the team’s performance assist in demonstrating best value and compliance with the statutory duty.

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Privacy and Data Protection

Accepting the recommendations will not increase the volume of personal data held by the Council

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Equalities

The recommendations do not propose a change in service therefore will not require an equalities impact assessment.

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Public Health

 

 

No impact

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Crime and Disorder

No impact

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Procurement

No impact

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

Biodiversity and Climate Change

No impact

Zoe Kent Interim Head of Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.      INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

 

2.1     The purpose of this report is to advise the Committee of the work undertaken by the Fraud & Compliance team within the Mid Kent Revenues and Benefits Partnership.

 

2.2     In 2016 the responsibility for investigating Housing Benefit fraud was moved from the Council’s Housing Benefit service to the Department for Works and Pensions (DWP).

 

2.3     The Council took the decision to continue with a shared fraud team along with Swale and Tunbridge Wells borough councils, as part of Mid Kent Services, using the team to investigate fraud and error within Council Tax and Business Rates.

 

2.4     The localisation of Council Tax Support and reliance on Business Rates as an income for the authority changed the financial risk to the Council and preceptors. Whilst there had been some activity to address the risk associated with single person discounts for Council Tax, the service had historically focused its efforts on Housing Benefit.

 

2.5     The transfer of the Housing Benefit fraud function to the DWP created both a risk and opportunity to the Council. With the administration of Housing Benefit and Council Tax Support being directly linked the Council had in effect been able to ‘police’ the two systems at the same time.

 

2.6     The change also created an opportunity in releasing a team of experienced specialist staff, with good local knowledge, to both manage the ongoing risk within Council Tax Support and deliver capacity to expand their work into other areas both within the Council and Business Rates systems.

 

2.7     With the value of discounts and exemptions estimated in excess of £16 million and the risk of customer fraud high, agreement was reached with the support of the precepting authorities to fund the current team on the understanding that there would be a suitable return on investment.

 

2.8     The agreed business case set out a method of sharing the cost and projected savings in line with the value to each partner based on their level of precept.

 

2020/21 Outturn

 

2.9     The focus in 2020-21 changed due to COVID-19. The majority of compliance reviews were halted, and the team were moved to helping with the applications for Business Rates Grants and Test and Trace payments.

 

2.10  In 2018-2019 penalties were introduced where those residents who do not report changes or who fraudulently make claims for discounts are issued with a penalty of £70. Penalties were not issued during 2020-21 due to the disruption caused by the COVID pandemic.

 

2.11  Table 1 shows a summary of savings generated across the 3 authorities by the team for 2020-21.

 

Table 1

 

Single Person Discount

£127,024

Housing Benefit Matching Service (HBMS)

£110,930

National Fraud Initiative (Council Tax Reduction and Single Person Discount)

£17,888

Other

£194,455

Total

£450,297

 

2021-22

 

2.12  In conjunction with the Kent Intelligence Network (KIN) software was partly funded by Kent County Council with a view to sharing information with other authorities in Kent to help reduce fraud and error in the county.

 

2.13  Kent County Council has partly funded a debtor tracing tool (Retriever) which is used to trace the whereabouts of Council Taxpayers who have left their properties owing amounts of Council Tax.

 

2.14  This has been successful with over 730 Council Tax debtors being traced so we can contact them at their current address to recover monies due.

 

2.15  Table 2 shows a summary of savings generated across the 3 authorities by the team for 2021-22.

 

Table 2

 

Retriever – Council Tax Debt brought back into recovery

£978,237

Penalties

£980

Total

£979,217

 

 

 

3.   AVAILABLE OPTIONS

 

3.1     Report is presented for information only.

 

 

 

4.        PREFERRED OPTION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS

 

4.1   Report is presented for information only.

 

 

 

5.       RISK

5.1    This report is presented for information only and has no risk management implications.

6.       CONSULTATION RESULTS AND PREVIOUS COMMITTEE FEEDBACK

 

None

 

 

7.       NEXT STEPS: COMMUNICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION

 

None

 

 

 

8.        REPORT APPENDICES

 

       None

 

 

9.        BACKGROUND PAPERS

 

        None