24/04033/REVIEW - APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY REVIEW FULL HEARING AND REVIEW OF INTERIM STEPS – THE HOP POLE, MAIDSTONE ROAD, NETTLESTEAD, KENT, ME18 5HH
To: Licensing Sub-Committee – 7th November 2024 at 10.00am.
By: Lorraine Neale, Senior Licensing Officer
Ward: Marden & Yalding
Summary: To consider this application for a summary review applied for by Kent Police and review interim steps taken on 16th October 2024.
For determination on full review options set out at 4.0 and review interim steps shown at Appendix 4 taken on 16th October 2024, options at 5.0, to have effect until the full review determination is in place if interim steps are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives.
This report is classified as public, with exempt appendices. The Appendices are referenced as appendix 5 & 6 of this report, The appendices contains exempt information as classified in paragraph/s 1, 2 and 7 to Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, in that they contain information relating to:
1 - Information relating to any individual.
2 - Information which is likely to reveal the identity of an individual.
7 - Information relating to any action taken or to be taken in connection with the prevention, investigation or prosecution of crime.
The public interest in maintaining this exemption outweighs the public interest in their disclosure due to the nature of the information provided.
1.0 General Points
1.1 Summary reviews of premises licenses were introduced by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 from the 1st October 2007. They provide for a quick process for licence review when the police consider that the premises concerned is associated with serious crime or serious disorder (or both) and the Licensing Authority considering whether interim steps are necessary in respect of a licence pending determination of a full review.
1.2 A Superintendent of Police or above must provide a certificate that in their opinion the premises are associated with serious crime or serious disorder or both.
1.3 Where such an application for review is made the licensing authority must, within 48 hours of the time of its receipt, consider whether it is necessary to take interim steps pending the determination of the review of the premises licence and within 28 days after the day of its receipt review the licence.
1.4 The licensing authority has power to consider whether or not to take interim steps without giving the holder of the premises licence an opportunity to make representations. If the authority decides to take interim steps the decision takes effect immediately or as soon as after that as the authority directs but the authority must give immediate notice of its decision and of the reasons for making it to a) the holder/s of the premises licence and b) the Chief Officer of Police.
1.5 The holder of the premises licence may make representations against any interim steps and the authority must within 48 hours of receiving those representations hold a hearing to consider those.
1.6 The Policing and Crime Act 2017 sections 138 and 139 made amendments to the process of summary review and since 6, April 2017 any interim steps taken must be reviewed at the full review hearing to determine whether they are appropriate to promote the licensing objectives, considering any relevant representations and determine whether to withdraw or modify those steps. The reviewed steps then apply until the period for appealing the full review decision has passed, or if it is appealed until that appeal is disposed of or until the end of a period that the authority determine but not longer than the above.
1.7 The Licensing Sub-Committee will be aware that it must carry out its functions under the 2003 Licensing Act with a view to promoting the licensing objectives. The Licensing objectives are: - the prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, the prevention of public nuisance, and the protection of children from harm. In carrying out its licensing functions, the Licensing Sub-Committee must also have regard to its statement of licensing policy and the Guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
2.0 Introduction and Background
2.1 The original premise licence for the premises was granted in September 2005 and was transferred to the current licence holder, Mr William Webb, The Hop Pole, Maidstone Road, Nettlestead, Kent, ME18 5HH in May 2023. The Current DPS in place at the premises is Daniel Sutton. A copy of the Premises licence showing the licensable activities and hours granted and applicable conditions is appended at Appendix 1.
2.2 Application has been made, at 12:22 on 15th October 2024 by Superintendent Pexton of Kent Police for a summary review of the premises licence for the Hop Pole Inn. A copy of the application and appropriate certificate is attached as Appendix 4.
2.3 A location plan of the premises is at Appendix 2.
2.4 The grounds for summary review were that on Sunday, 13th October at about 02:00, serious disorder occurred at the Hop Pole Inn where weapons were involved and serious injury to a number of people occurred up to the level of serious crime and/or serious disorder. CCTV showed these incidents occurred, after the premises licensable hours and that the sale and supply of alcohol carried on beyond the permitted hours and therefore all sales beyond 23.00 were unlicensed. Children are also quite clearly seen in CCTV footage in the bar area even though the licence does not allow it.
2.5 Police requested that Members consider suspension of the premises licence pending the full review hearing. Kent Police consider that this would ensure public safety and to give an opportunity for the Premises Licence Holder and the police to fully consider appropriate measures to present to a full review hearing.
On 16th October 2024 Sub Committee Members considered whether it was necessary to take interim steps pending the determination of the review applied for. In order to assist them and in the interests of fairness they allowed both Kent Police and the licence holders to address them prior to their decision. After discussion with the Police and Licence Holder Members agreed that that only the suspension of the licence would properly promote the licensing objectives and that this interim step was necessary for the prevention of crime and disorder, public nuisance, public safety and the protection of children from harm.
- The determination on interim steps was to
- SUSPEND THE PREMISES LICENCE
- THAT THE DECISION HAS IMMEDIATE EFFECT.
2.6 The Police have provided additional information relating to the review which is attached as Appendix 6 which includes CCTV footage.
3.0 Notice of the review application was advertised as required and there has been no further representation from Responsible Authorities but there has been 4 representation from other parties, which include Jackie Bennett, Mr & Mrs Hensbergen, Nettlestead Parish Council and Councillor Claudine Russell representing residents, these are attached as Appendix 3.
3.0 The Licensing Authority must now hold a hearing to determine its decision on full review, considering any relevant representations received and the relevant legislation, guidance and policy. They must take steps, as considered appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives from the following options:
Options
(1) To consider no steps appropriate.
(2) The modification of the conditions of the premises licence.
(3) The exclusion of a licensable activity from the scope of the licence.
(4) The removal of the designated premises supervisor from the licence.
(5) The suspension of the licence.
(6) The revocation of the licence.
Modification of existing condition/s can include alteration, omission or addition of any new conditions.
4.0 Following determination of the full review the Sub Committee must review the interim steps taken on 16, October 2024 and consider whether those steps are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives, consider any relevant representations and determine whether to withdraw or modify the interim steps taken. The power to review includes power to take any of the following interim steps.
Options
(1) The modification of the conditions of the premises licence
(2) The exclusion of the sale by retail of alcohol from the scope of the licence
(3) The removal of the designated premises supervisor from the licence
(4) The suspension of the licence
Conditions of the licence are modified if any of them is altered; omitted or any new condition is added.
Any interim steps taken at this stage apply until the end of the period given for appealing the full review decision, if there is an appeal until the appeal is disposed of or the end of a period determined by the authority, which may not be longer than the above periods.
.
5.0 The hearing will be conducted following the procedure attached at Appendix 4. The Licensing Act 2003 ss 53 A-D and Chapter 12 of the S182 Guidance as revised in April 2017 are particularly relevant.
6.1 The full review determination can be appealed by all parties, within 21 days of the decision being given to the local Magistrates’ Court. The review of interim steps determination can be appealed by the Police or Licence Holder within the same period to the Magistrates’ Court. In respect of the review of interim steps determination the Court must hear the appeal within 28 days beginning with the day when the appeal is lodged. The full review decision does not have effect until the end of the appeal period or until its disposal and there is no time limit on the time for hearing. If there are appeals against both review of interim steps and the full review decision the Court may decide to hear both together.
6.0 Corporate Implications
7.1 Impact on Corporate Priorities
None
7.2 Cross Cutting Objectives
None
7.3 Risk Management
Not relevant
7.4 Financial
Not relevant
7.5 Staffing
Not relevant
7.6 Legal
As set out in the body of the report, The Licensing Sub-Committee must take account of the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998; which gives further effect in the United Kingdom to the fundamental rights and freedoms contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Licensing Sub-Committee must have proper regard to the rights of the individual when making decisions that affect them. However, it also has to have regard to the safety and protection of the public and therefore to ensure that the right balance is found.
7.7 Information Governance
Not relevant
7.8 Equalities
Not relevant
7.9 Public Health
Not relevant
7.10 Crime and disorder
Addressed with the relevant legislation.
7.11 Procurement
Not relevant
7.12 Biodiversity and Climate Change
Not relevant
8 Recommendation
That the Sub-Committee consider the application of Kent Police and any relevant representations and take such steps as it considers appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives.
Following the above determination review interim steps taken on 16th October 2024 and decide whether to withdraw or modify them, considering whether they are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives and considering relevant representations.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 – Part A of Premises Licence of The Hop Pole Inn
APPENDIX 2 – Location map of Premises – The Hop Pole Inn
APPENDIX 3 – Representation, other parties
APPENDIX 4 – Order of proceedings
EXEMPT APPENDIX 5 – Original of application form and certificate of Summary review sent by Police.
EXEMPTAPPENDIX 6 – Police – provision of additional information and CCTV Pt 2
BACKGROUND PAPERS
Revised Guidance issued under S182 of the Licensing Act 2003
Licensing Act 2003 (hearings) Regulations 2005 (S.I 2005/44)
The Licensing Act 2003 (Premises Licence and Club premises Certificates) Regulations 2005
The Licensing Act 2003 – Section 53A (premises associated with serious crime and disorder)
Section 53A-C Licensing Act 2003 - Summary Review Guidance
Officer Contact: Lorraine Neale, Senior Licensing Officer