Contact your Parish Council
MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
RECORD OF DECISION OF THE Cabinet Member for Environment
|
Decision Made: |
10 June 2011 |
Bereavement Services - new memorial opportunities
Issue for Decision
To consider the introduction and associated charges and grounds development for new memorials being provided at the Vinters Park Crematorium and the Maidstone Cemetery.
Decision Made
1. That the proposed range of new memorials being introduced at the Crematorium and the Cemetery as set out at Appendix A to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services be agreed.
2. That the associated charges and income/expenditure projections for the new memorials being introduced as set out at Appendices B and C to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services be agreed.
3. That the proposed development of new pathways and strewing area and the refurbishment of the Woodside walk be agreed.
Reasons for Decision
The Crematorium site has recently undergone a major
upgrading and redecoration/refurbishment programme to the buildings and some
landscaping to the grounds that makes it one of the best facilities in the
south east. As part of this upgrading work, consideration was also given to
improving the customer service and chapel service side of the operation and
this has been particularly well received by visitors and local funeral
directors.
An area of the service that now needs to be considered in
Bereavement Services is the memorial opportunity for both the Crematorium and
Cemetery sites.
A review of the demand for the current range of memorials
offered at the Crematorium suggests that some are not as popular now as in
years gone by.
At the Cemetery the only memorial opportunity offered by the
council is confined to dedicated benches though the main focus for families is
usually a headstone which is obtained from a stone mason.
This range of memorials at the Crematorium and Cemetery has
been maintained for many years with few additional or different opportunities
being introduced. Whilst this situation satisfies the wishes of bereaved
families who choose to adopt their personal memorials for a loved one, the
industry has developed a number of new memorials that have proved to be very
popular at neighbouring crematoria and cemeteries around the country.
In tandem with introducing new memorials at the Crematorium
will be the opportunity to develop associated pathways and improve access to
the Woodside walk area and also to create a new strewing area as part of the on
going work to improve the grounds and their ambiance.
The new memorials
Appendix A to the report of the Assistant
Director of Environment and Regulatory Services sets out the range of new
memorials that it is proposed are made available at the Crematorium and Cemetery.
Many of these memorials will assist in the development of the grounds and
create a location for the interment or strewing of cremated remains.
The proposed charges for the new memorials are set out at Appendix B and Appendix C of the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services, showing the income/expenditure projections. The charges presented have been reviewed against other neighbouring authority charges for similar products and provide a range of prices that will allow families individual choice over the type and period of their preferred adoption.
Alternatives considered and why rejected
An alternative action would be to maintain exactly the same
memorial opportunities as at present, but this situation is not recommended as
it would result in the further reduction in the adoption of memorials from the
current range as they become less popular. Not reviewing and offering new
memorial opportunities would deprive and restrict bereaved families from more
choice to match their personal preferences.
Background Papers
Bereavement Services Fees & Charges 2011-12 report
Should you be concerned about this decision and wish to call it in, please submit a call in form signed by any two Non-Executive Members to the Head of Change and Scrutiny by: 17 June 2011 |