Contact your Parish Council
MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
RECORD OF DECISION OF THE Cabinet Member for Corporate Services
|
|
Decision Made: |
20 August 2010 |
Non Domestic Rates - Discretionary Charitable Rate Relief - 1
Issue for Decision
To consider an application for discretionary charitable rate relief.
Decision Made
That no discretionary rate relief be awarded, as it is not considered that the application falls within current council policy.
Reasons for Decision
The Council’s current policy regarding rate relief for charitable and other similar organisations is as follows:-
|
CHARITY/ORGANISATION |
RELIEF |
|
Religious |
80%(Mandatory, no Discretionary) |
|
Charity Shops |
80%(Mandatory, no Discretionary) |
|
Educational |
80%(Mandatory, no Discretionary) |
|
Welfare |
80%(Mandatory, no Discretionary) |
|
Recreational |
80%(Mandatory, no Discretionary) |
|
Youth |
100% (80% Mandatory, 20% Discretionary) (Excluding School primary/secondary/further education) |
|
Village Halls |
100% (80%Mandatory, 20% Discretionary) |
Schools are specifically excluded from qualifying under the Youth category element to avoid any complications that might arise as a result of an application being received from a school that does not qualify for relief under the Education provision.
The current policy does not currently allow for any discretionary rate relief to be awarded, with the exception of the amounts listed in the Youth Organisations and Village Halls categories.
Cathy Rogers
Miss Rogers occupies Unit C3, The Power Hub Business Centre, St Peter’s Street, Maidstone, Kent ME16 0ST together with Sebastian Edge. Her application is as follows:
Miss Rogers has advised that she and Mr Edge both live and work in Maidstone and have recently completed a MA’s at University for the Creative Arts, Maidstone and would like to base their creative practice here in the County Town. The unit is being used as an artist studio (non-commercial) for their sole use and is not available for use by other persons.
“We’re using the space as a place to continue to develop our artistic practices (I work with super 8 film and my colleague with wet collodion photography) and have set up a photographic darkroom where I can process my super 8 and my partner his wet collodion plates.
We’re both passionate about fostering a creative community here in Maidstone and this is where we want to produce work. We want to be part of and help to develop a ‘sustainable community’ that can provide the level of resources that we need as workers in the creative industries. We both work part-time for other organizations during the week, which is how we currently fund the rent, service charge and utility bills for the unit.
We are applying for reduced rates under the small business criteria (the rateable value for the unit in 2009/10 was £2,900 which has just gone up to £4,400 for 2010/11). However, if we can secure full discretionary business rate relief this would greatly help us to sustain the use of the studio and ultimately stay in Maidstone to develop our work and creative opportunities”.
Relief has been refused by officers as granting relief to these individuals is not within current guidelines.
The assessment has a rateable value of £4400 with a current annual charge of £1,444.14. However, the property already currently receives 50% Small Business rates Relief, which has reduced the amount payable from £1,444.14 to £722.07. The following table shows the effect if 80% discretionary Rate Relief were awarded where no mandatory rate relief has been allowed:
|
Value of Relief awarded |
25% Charge to the Council’s General Fund |
|
|
|
|
£577.66 |
£144.42 |
The rates for the period 1 February 2010 to 31 March 2010 are calculated on a rateable value of £2900 and amount to £225.48. This charge is also reduced by 50% Small Business rates Relief, which has reduced the amount payable from £225.48 to £112.74. The following table shows the effect if 80% discretionary Rate Relief were awarded where no mandatory rate relief has been allowed:
|
Value of Relief awarded |
25% Charge to the Council’s General Fund |
|
|
|
|
£90.19 |
£22.55 |
For information; although the rateable value in the new rating list commencing 1 April 2010 has increased compared with the 2005 list value, there has been a reduction in the rate poundage for the year commencing (40.7 p in the pound compared to 48.1 p in the pound for last year)
Alternatives considered and why rejected
Relief could be awarded, and although it would not be a major cost to the council, it would not be in accordance with current guidelines and may set a precedent for other ratepayers occupying small assessments to make similar applications.
Background Papers
None
|
Should you be concerned about this decision and wish to call it in, please submit a call in form signed by any two Non-Executive Members to the Head of Change and Scrutiny by: 27 August 2010 |