Contact your Parish Council


 

<AI1>

 

MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL

 

RECORD OF DECISION OF THE Cabinet Member for Community Services

 

 

 

 

Decision Made:

08 October 2009

 

Equity Release

 

 

Issue for Decision

 

To conisder endorsing the council’s involvement and participation in a national pilot supported by Joseph Rowntree Foundation, to improve the financial circumstances and quality of life of older homeowners in receipt of state benefits.

 

 

Decision Made

 

1.   That the council becomes one of four local authorities to pilot a service developed in conjunction with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation to offer older home owners financial advice and access to an exclusive equity release product.

2.   That the pilot period commences from October/November 2009 for an 18 month period.

 

 

 

Reasons for Decision

 

Maidstone has moderately high property prices while also having some areas of social deprivation.  Many households are considered to have low incomes yet be living in properties of relatively high asset value.  Access to financial advice and the use of equity release would enable such households to release equity from their homes to fund a range of services such as support in the home, service charges and repairs.

By participating in the pilot, the council would be supporting the corporate objective of improving the quality of life of older homeowners by enabling them to fund services that they wish to purchase through the equity release scheme giving them the potential to maintain their independence and thereby enabling them to stay in their own homes for longer. 

 

Background

In 2007, Joseph Rowntree Foundation was commissioned by the Department of Health to investigate the obstacles to equity release for older home owners.  The outcome of the research was that Equity Release has a poor reputation, that it is perceived to be poor value and that it can result in a loss of benefits.  A task group was set up to develop a suitable financial product and explore methods of improving the perceptions of equity release.  The task group included representatives from the public and voluntary sectors, including the Department for Work and Pensions, local authorities, Age Concern and Care and Counsel.

 

The task group identified that existing equity release products were not suitable for those older homeowners in receipt of state benefits, as they require a minimum amount of £10,000 to be taken.  This level of equity release would result in the individual losing their entitlement to state benefit (specifically pension credit) and as a result, being financially worse off.

 

As a result the task group produced a specification setting out the type of equity release product that would be tailored to meet the needs of those older homeowners who required a lower level of additional income to improve their quality of life and help to maintain their independence, but without losing their benefit entitlement.

 

The specification was sent to all equity release providers and one provider, “Just Retirement” responded positively. “Just Retirement” agreed to participate in the proposed pilot and provide independent financial advice and access to the Equity Release product that had been produced exclusively for the pilot.

Pilot project proposal

The pilot project will develop a framework to support older home owners to consider releasing equity to fund support at home and other services and signpost them to the provider for this pilot project.  The financial product has already been developed exclusively for this pilot.  The project will also consider the role of the council in supporting residents through the process and protecting them from financial abuse.

 

The council will not be providing the financial advice or the financial product.  The role of the council and its partners will be to identify residents that are likely to benefit from releasing equity from their properties with a view to funding services that will enable them to maintain their independence.  Key staff, including staff from other agencies and the voluntary sector, will be able to signpost older home owners to Just Retirement Solutions for an independent financial assessment.  This service will guide residents through an assessment of their income and eligibility for further benefits.  The outcome of the assessment may be to recommend the equity release product to which the pilot relates. 

 

The project will also include the development of a marketing strategy and training framework for internal staff, partners and voluntary organisations.  The project approach, particularly in relation to marketing of the service/product, will be finalised and agreed with partners and the voluntary sector.

 

The project will be subject to review through regular meetings, internally and with partners to ensure that key deliverables and milestones are being met.

 

Communications will be a key part of the project and information will be widely disseminated to all stakeholders, including through the Older People’s Forum.

 

 

Alternatives considered and why rejected

 

I could choose not to participate in the pilot project, but this would result in a missed opportunity to improve the financial circumstances and quality of life of older homeowners on low incomes.

 

 

 

Should you be concerned about this decision and wish to call it in, please submit a call in form signed by any two Non-Executive Members to the Scrutiny Manager by:  23/10/2009.


</AI1>

<AI2>

 

MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL

 

RECORD OF DECISION OF THE Cabinet Member for Community Services

 

 

 

 

Decision Made:

08 October 2009

 

Kent Credit Union

 

 

Issue for Decision

 

To consider formal support from the council including a financial contribution of £10,000 over two years.

 

 

 

Decision Made

 

That the Kent Credit Union be formally supported and given a total financial contribution from the council of £10,000 over 2 years. 

 

 

Reasons for Decision

 

A Credit Union is a savings and loans co-operative which promotes financial inclusion by encouraging its members to save money and by providing low cost loans – including to those who find it difficult to borrow from mainstream sources.

 

Credit Unions are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and all individual investments are 100% guaranteed by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (up to £50K).

 

Kent County Council is proposing the establishment of a county wide Kent Credit Union (including Medway) through a charitable company.

 

The Kent Credit Union will offer a range of savings products, including instant access and longer term bond accounts.  Four different types of loans will be available for a range of circumstances with the credit union lending to people out of work and homeowners.  It is also hoped that a bill payment service will be offered working closely with money advice agencies.  It will focus on supporting those who find it difficult to access mainstream financial services working through local champions and trusted intermediaries in the county’s most deprived neighbourhoods.

 

The Kent Credit Union will be an independent legal entity Kent & Medway Financial Inclusion Partnership Ltd.  This company will be applying to the FSA for authorisation and is being supported by KCC during its development phase working with a steering group of supporters and other interested parties which includes district councils, registered social landlords and the advice sector.

 

Since 2002 the council has been a partner with Maidstone Housing Trust and Hyde Housing and the Kent Reliance Building Society (KRBS) in a Savings and Loans Partnership scheme targeted at their social housing tenants in the borough.  This scheme involved the council as a sleeping partner investing £10,000 as a loans deposit guarantee.  However the scheme was not taken up by Housing Trust tenants in any significant numbers, for a variety of reasons including lack of tenant awareness and tenant difficulties in accessing the financial services.  KRBS therefore took the decision to close it in 2008 and to return the council’s deposit.  It is proposed that this returned sum be reallocated as the council’s contribution to the Kent Credit Union.  Maidstone Housing Trust has committed to invest £10,000 in the Credit Union.  Measures designed to promote the scheme and improve financial accessibility include use of the internet and Pay Point, a money advice service and work in local schools.  The Kent Credit Union’s services are outlined in 1.3.11 below.

 

What does this mean for the borough of Maidstone?

 

In 2006 the Financial Inclusion Action Group for the South East reported that Kent is the biggest example of an area of high financial exclusion with very low provision of community finance.

 

Though the Borough as a whole shares the relative prosperity of the South East there exist persistent pockets of deprivation within it.  The national Index of Multiple Deprivation in its last update (December 2007) showed areas of the High St Ward where average income  ranged from the lowest 2.6% to the lowest 16.9% nationally, areas of Park Wood where income levels ranged from the lowest 14-15% nationally and  areas of Shepway where the corresponding figure was 16.4%-18.5%.  A Credit Union is designed in part to support and develop residents whose current income and/or debt levels may not make them attractive to traditional banks, and who are the most vulnerable to loan sharking.


 

1.1.1   The latest Maidstone Citizen’s Advice Bureau figures show their debt work increasing by 56% in the first third of 2009 in comparison with the same period for 2008.  In the first quarter of 2009, their money advisors have dealt with £3.6 million of indebtedness which is an increase of a third over the same period for 2008.  While a Credit Union cannot in itself reduce individuals’ debts, it has a clear role in providing access to an account which permits people the opportunity to make savings and to subsequently take out loans in circumstances where a traditional bank would not be able or willing to help, and it has an important role in providing budget and money management advice to accompany this facility.

 

1.1.2   How will it work?

 

1.1.3   At the outset, the Kent Credit Union will employ professional, paid staff to offer a range of services across the county by working with existing organisations.

 

1.1.4   Services will include:-

 

·         Affordable loans based on ability to repay

·         Flexible savings in cash, direct debit and automatic deduction from wages and benefits

·         Life insurance as a standard membership benefit

·         Budgeting and money management advice

·         A bill payment service

·         Junior savers working in partnership with local schools

·         Ability to apply for a loan and check your balance via the internet

·         Pay Point

·         Many options for cash withdrawals and payments throughout the county.

 

1.3.14The Credit Union will supply a breakdown of take up across the  borough in order for the Council to monitor effectiveness.

 

 

Alternatives considered and why rejected

 

I could choose not to support the Kent Credit Union. However, the council would not have the resources to provide the type of financial support the Credit Union has the capacity to provide for the borough’s residents.

 

 

 

Should you be concerned about this decision and wish to call it in, please submit a call in form signed by any two Non-Executive Members to the Scrutiny Manager by:  23/10/2009.

</AI2>

<TRAILER_SECTION>

</TRAILER_SECTION>

<TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>

 

MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL

 

RECORD OF DECISION OF THE FIELD_DMTITLE

 

 

 

FIELD_TITLE

 

 

Issue for Decision

 

FIELD_ISSUE_SUMMARY

 

Decision Made

 

FIELD_SUMMARY

 

Reasons for Decision

 

FIELD_DECISION_REASON

 

Alternatives considered and why rejected

 

FIELD_DECISION_OPTIONS

 

Background Papers

 

FIELD_DECISION_SUBJECT

 

 

 


 

</TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>

<LAYOUT_SECTION>

 

MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL

 

RECORD OF DECISION OF THE FIELD_DMTITLE

 

 

 

 

FIELD_TITLE

 

 

Issue for Decision

 

FIELD_ISSUE_SUMMARY

 

Decision Made

 

FIELD_SUMMARY

 

Reasons for Decision

 

FIELD_DECISION_REASON

 

Alternatives considered and why rejected

 

FIELD_DECISION_OPTIONS

 

Background Papers

 

FIELD_DECISION_SUBJECT

 

 

 


</LAYOUT_SECTION>