Contact your Parish Council
MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
AUDIT COMMITTEE
7 JUNE 2010
REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Report prepared by David Edwards
1. AUDIT COMMISSIONS AUDIT AND INSPECTION FEE LETTER
1.1 Issue for Decision
1.1.1 To consider and note the Audit Commissions Fee Letter for 2010/11.
1.2 Recommendation of the Chief Executive
1.2.1 That the Audit Committee considers and notes the Audit Commissions Fee Letter for 2010/11.
1.3 Reasons for Recommendation
1.3.1 The
Audit Commission has reviewed the approach to their audit work and attached at
Appendix A is the Fee Letter for 2010/11 as submitted by the Councils External
Auditors. This includes the Annual Audit and Inspection work for 2010/11. The
Letter includes details of the work that the auditors will be carrying out
during the year. The work plan has been the subject of informal discussions
with Senior Officers and the Leader. The work includes a continuation of the
auditors assessments of Use of Resources and Value for Money, the financial
statements and the accounts for which a separate plan will be published later.
1.3.2 The
Letter details the outputs to be provided from the work of the External
Auditors and the audit and inspection fee required for the provision of work.
The proposed fee required for the provision of this work can be accommodated
within the Councils budget. Members will note that although the total audit
and inspection fee has increased by 6.9%, this will be offset by a one-off
payment from the Commission in 2010/11, as some of their balances are being returned
to authorities. The actual fee will therefore only increase by approximately
£2k, a 1.5% increase.
1.3.3 In
2010/11 the fee will include additional work on the International Financial
Reporting Standard (IFRS) and assessing the Councils partnership working
arrangements.
1.3.4 It
is anticipated that the External Auditors will present their Letter to the Audit
Committee and be available to answer questions and receive comments from
Members.
1.3.4 The
proposed work plan Letter will also be considered by Cabinet at its meeting on
14 July 2010.
1.4 Alternative Action and why not Recommended
1.4.1 The Fee Letter is produced under the statutory requirements governing External Audit and no alternatives are considered. Members may request further work to be done by the External Auditors, at a cost, but this is considered unnecessary and is not recommended for 2010/11.
1.5 Impact on Corporate Objectives
1.5.1 The Fee Letter covers the corporate wellbeing of the council and is an integral part of the Corporate Governance arrangements of the council.
1.6
Risk
Management
1.6.1 The work of the External Auditors is an essential element of the Corporate Governance arrangement of the council. The elements of the arrangements audited are subject to individual risk assessments.
1.7
Other
Implications
1.7.1
1. Financial
|
X |
2. Staffing
|
|
3. Legal
|
|
4. Equality Impact Needs Assessment
|
|
5. Environmental/Sustainable Development
|
|
6. Community Safety
|
|
7. Human Rights Act
|
|
8. Procurement
|
|
9. Asset Management
|
|
1.7.2 The
financial implications are in the body of the report.
1.8 Background Documents
IS THIS A KEY DECISION REPORT?
Yes No
If yes, when did it first appear in the Forward Plan?
..
This is a Key Decision because: ..
.
Wards/Parishes affected: ..
..
|
1.8.1 None