Contact your Parish Council


THE MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL

 

MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL

 

STANDARDS COMMITTEE

 

22ND MAY 2009

 

REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CUSTOMER SERVICES AND PARTNERSHIPS  AND THE HEAD OF CORPORATE LAW AND LEGAL SERVICES

 

Report prepared by IT Manager 

 

 

1.           ANNUAL REVIEW OF COMPLAINTS  2008 –  2009

 

1.1        Issue for Decision

 

1.1.1   To consider the Council’s performance in dealing with complaints for the period 1st April 2008 to 31st March 2009.

 

1.2        Recommendation of the Assistant Director of Customer Services and Partnerships and the Head of Corporate Law and Legal Services

 

1.2.1   That the issues outlined in the report be noted and endorsed.

 

1.3        Reasons for recommendation

 

1.3.1   On June 1 2005, the Council’s Management Team introduced a new corporate complaints system.  Standards Committee have since received quarterly reports detailing the Council’s performance in relation to the agreed Complaints Policy, and this report sets out the Council’s performance in handling complaints for the year 1st April 2008 to 31st March 2009.

 

1.3.2   Since the introduction of a set of Corporate Complaints policies and management system the Council has been able to monitor its response to complaints in order to achieve significant improvements in both response times to complaints and quality of response. Prior to introducing the new system the Council responded to approximately 60% of all complaints within 10 working days.  Performance now is regularly over 90%, and as well as monitoring the performance of complaints the Council carries out quarterly satisfaction surveys. 

 

1.3.3   During the year the Council received 245 complaints.  Performance of Stage 1 complaints overall during the year was excellent with 93% answered within 10 working days.   A further more detailed analysis identified the following headline issues:

 

 

 

 

Fig 1: Monthly breakdown of number of complaints and % answered within 10 days

 

·                      The number of complaints per month remained reasonably consistent between 10 and 30.

 

·                      Performance in responding to complaints within this period was consistently high, only falling below 90% in December.

 

·                     The four services with the highest  numbers of complaints received were:

 

Service

Number of complaints

% answered on time

Revenues/NNDR

32

93%

Development control

32

96%

Parking Enforcement

32

96%

Waste Collection

30

96%

 

·                     The four services with the worst response rate within 10 working days were:

 

Service

Number of complaints

% answered on time

Building Surveying

4

50%

Conservation & Landscape

5

60%

Sports and Play

4

75%

Housing

16

75%

 

 

1.3.4   In October 2008 The Council (along with all Local Authorities) carried out the ‘Place Survey’. 5,000 questionnaires were sent out, of which 2,300 were returned and 46% stated that they were happy with the way the Council runs its affairs.

 

1.3.6   In terms of comparison with complaints data for the previous years:

 

·                     In 2008/09 the number of complaints decreased by 25% compared to 2007/08.

 

·                     The following sections received no complaints during the year 2008/09 – Audit, Change & Improvement, Secretariats, Communications, Hazlitt Theatre, IT Section, Legal Services, Overview & Scrutiny,  and Registration Services.

 

·                     During 2006/07,  34 Stage 2 complaints were raised; 10 (29.4%) were dealt with within SLA and 24 outside of the service agreement.

 

·                     During 2007/08, 48 Stage 2 complaints were raised, 42 (87.5%) were dealt with within the service agreement and only 6 outside.

 

·                     During 2008/9, 38 stage 2 complaints were raised, 36 (95%) were dealt with within the service agreement and only 2 outside.

 

·                     Complaints to the Ombudsman rose slightly from 31 in 2006/7 to 36 in 2007/8 .  However, once again the LGO did not find maladministration in any of the cases- the LGO will be issuing his annual report for 2008/9 in the summer.

 

 

1.3.5    A more detailed breakdown of complaints received is attached at Appendix 1.

 

 

1.4        Alternative Action and why not Recommended

 

1.4.1 The Council’s complaints policies and management systems underpin its commitment to excellent customer care and therefore a robust system needs to be in place.

 

1.5        Impact on Corporate Objectives

 

1.5.1   Customer Services is a key priority, and the nature of complaints from our Customers and the manner in which the Council responds to those complaints touches upon every priority theme in the Council’s strategic plan.

 

1.6     Risk Management

 

1.6.1 Failure to manage complaints represents both a financial risk to the Council and a risk to its reputation.  Regular reports are produced for Management and individual Heads of Service are reminded of their responsibilities.  The process corporately is overseen by the Head of Customer Services and is supported by the work of the Reputation Project.

 

1.7     Other Implications

 

1.      Financial

 

 

X

2.           Staffing

 

 

 

3.           Legal

 

 

 

4.           Social Inclusion

 

 

 

5.           Environmental/Sustainable Development

 

 

6.           Community Safety

 

 

7.           Human Rights Act

 

 

8.           Procurement

 

 

 

 

1.8        Financial

 

1.8.1   During the year 2008/9 the Ombudsman recommended that the council make a local settlement in 4 cases, involving the payment of £900,  relating to  a homelessness application, an anti-social behavior issue, and two relating to planning consultations.

 

1.8.2   In addition to these local settlements the Council made payments of £125  in relation to 3 other complaints without Ombudsman intervention as set out below:

 

·         £25 in respect of council tax mistaken identity;

 

·         £50 (x2) in relation to planning consultations

 

 

1.9        Background Documents

 

1.9.1  None.

 

NO REPORT WILL BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT THIS BOX BEING COMPLETED

 

 

 

X

 
 


Is this a Key Decision?        Yes                        No     

 

If yes, when did it appear in the Forward Plan? _______________________

 

 

X

 

 

 
Is this an Urgent Key Decision?     Yes                  No

 

Reason for Urgency

 


Appendix 1: Breakdown of complaints by Service 2008 - 9

 

Date From:

 

01/04/2008

Date To:

 

31/03/2009

 

Service Breakdown (Stage 1)

Service

Total

On Time

Late

Success

Council Tax or Business Rates

32

30

2

93%

Development Control

32

31

1

96%

Parking Enforcement

32

31

1

96%

Waste Collection

30

29

1

96%

Housing and Council Tax Benefits

16

14

2

87%

Housing Options, Private Sector Housing or Housing Policy

16

12

4

75%

Contact Centre

14

14

0

100%

Planning Enforcement

14

13

1

92%

Concessionary Fares

9

9

0

100%

Pollution

8

8

0

100%

Leisure

7

7

0

100%

Conservation and Landscape

5

3

2

60%

Other

5

5

0

100%

Bereavement Services

4

4

0

100%

Building Surveying

4

2

2

50%

Sports and Play

4

3

1

75%

Grounds Maintenance

3

3

0

100%

Street Sweeping

3

3

0

100%

Public Toilets

2

2

0

100%

Community Safety

1

1

0

100%

Food and Safety

1

1

0

100%

Licensing

1

1

0

100%

Social Inclusion

1

1

0

100%