Contact your Parish Council


Harrow Council

APPENDIX G

Strategic Risk Catalogue

 

Section or Service                 Risk category                                                                                   

 

Waste Collection                 Customer, Environmental/Financial                                                                                        

 

Risk No

Vulnerability

(Why, what’s happening, what’s the problem)

Trigger/risk

(What’s the event/ what could go wrong?)

Consequences

(What would occur as a result, how much of a problem would it be, to whom and why?)

Current Rating

1

Residents not willing to hire garden waste bins

Price is deemed too high

More households unsuitable for wheeled bins that expected

Reasons behind changes not clearly explained

Reputational risk of bad publicity

Garden waste presented in black sacks and can not be collected

Increase in waste being dumped on street

C3

2

Residents not aware of the changes being introduced to the garden waste service

Message is not clearly publicised

Negative publicity

Reputational risk

Complaints made to retailers about lack of stock

D2

3

Unable to satisfy high demand for garden bin requests

Higher than expected demand for the bins

Unable to maintain large enough stock to satisfy demand

Reputational risk

High level of complaints

Waste dumped on street

C2

4

Developers / New occupiers refuse to pay for new or replacement bins

Information is not publicised sufficiently

Information not included as part of property search

Residents not provided with appropriate containers for waste and recycling

Waste presented in inappropriate containers

Increased spillage / littering

D3

5

Rationalised recycling sites do not meet the needs of the local community

Residents continue to use recycling sites for glass and cartons rather than the new kerbside collection

Information about the kerbside collection is not clear

Landowners do not wish to maintain the textile banks

Recycling left around the remaining banks or at former recycling sites has to be disposed of

Negative publicity

 

D3

6

Residents not willing to store black sacks in property for 2 weeks

Review of black sack properties fails to take residents’ views into consideration

Residents not willing to use weekly food waste collections to reduce their residual waste

Black sacks dumped on pavement

Increased problems with littering if waste left out on pavements

Negative publicity

C3

 

 

 

Risk Action Plan

 

Risk Number

Current

Risk Score

Target

Risk Score

Description

1

C3

D3

Residents not willing to hire garden waste bins

Action/Controls already in place

Adequacy of action/control to address risk

Required management action/control

Responsibility for action

Critical success factors & KPIs

Review frequency

Key dates

Garden bins have been incentivised over the past couple of years with price remaining low. All households have been assessed for suitability for bins.  Refuse bin policy already in place. 

Fair

Price maintained at reasonable level and not increased significantly at start of new contract

Jennifer Gosling

Number of garden bin accounts

Monthly

July 2013

 

 

Risk Number

Current

Risk Score

Target

Risk Score

Description

2

D2

E3

Residents not aware of the changes being introduced to the garden waste service

Action/Controls already in place

Adequacy of action/control to address risk

Required management action/control

Responsibility for action

Critical success factors & KPIs

Review frequency

Key dates

Comprehensive communications plan prepared to ensure message is targeted to users of garden sack service.

Experience / lessons learnt from changes to garden sack service in 2010. 

 

Good

Monitoring of bin requests and levels of bags presented for collection.

Monitoring of crews to confirm bin tags being left to advise residents

Jennifer Gosling

Level of complaints

 

Number of garden bin accounts

Monthly

July 2013

 

Risk Number

Current

Risk Score

Target

Risk Score

Description

3

C2

D3

Unable to satisfy high demand for garden bin requests

Action/Controls already in place

Adequacy of action/control to address risk

Required management action/control

Responsibility for action

Critical success factors & KPIs

Review frequency

Key dates

Large bin stock and future orders already in place.

Additional capacity to deliver bins available through overtime

Fair

Weekly monitoring of bin requests to ensure stock is sufficient and new orders are placed in time to receive the bins.

Alternative suppliers available to provide bins if necessary

Jennifer Gosling

Level of bin requests

 

Monthly stock figures

Weekly

July 2012 – Aug 2013

 

 

Risk Number

Current

Risk Score

Target

Risk Score

Description

4

D3

E4

Developers / New occupiers refuse to pay for new or replacement bins

Action/Controls already in place

Adequacy of action/control to address risk

Required management action/control

Responsibility for action

Critical success factors & KPIs

Review frequency

Key dates

Already in operation for euro bins and have experience of working with developers

Alternative methods of collection could be considered whilst disputes are resolved.

 

Fair

Information needs to be included with information provided as part of property searches.

Information updated on website.

Information provided to estate agents and developers.

 

Jennifer Gosling

Level of complaints

 

Number of bins purchased

Quarterly

September 2012

 

 

Risk Number

Current

Risk Score

Target

Risk Score

Description

5

D3

E3

Rationalised recycling sites do not meet the needs of the local community

Action/Controls already in place

Adequacy of action/control to address risk

Required management action/control

Responsibility for action

Critical success factors & KPIs

Review frequency

Key dates

Recycling sites have been reviewed previously following changes to kerbside service without any issues.

Monthly monitoring of the tonnage figures.  Sufficient time to gain 12 months of baseline data for comparison with the data obtained following service changes.

Good

Involvement / consultation of Ward Members, Parish Councils, land owners and users of the facilities in decision to remove banks

Jennifer Gosling

Level of complaints

 

 

Quarterly

July 2013 – 12 month baseline results

 

March 2014 – 6 months following kerbside collection

 

Risk Number

Current

Risk Score

Target

Risk Score

Description

6

C3

D2

Residents not willing to store black sacks in property for 2 weeks

Action/Controls already in place

Adequacy of action/control to address risk

Required management action/control

Responsibility for action

Critical success factors & KPIs

Review frequency

Key dates

Policy will not be introduced across all exempted properties, but will be dealt with on individual notice.

Will seek to gain residents’ support of changes before considering introducing any.

Good

 

Jennifer Gosling

Level of complaints

Customer satisfaction

Monthly

July 2013 - ongoing