Contact your Parish Council
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SCRAIP)
Committee: Regeneration & Economic Development Overview & scrutiny Committee
Meeting Date: 31 July 2012
Minute №:
Topic: Exempt Report for Phase 2 High Street Regeneration Project
|
Recommendation[i] |
Cabinet Member[ii] |
Response[iii]
|
Timetable[iv] |
Lead Officer[v] |
|
All the High Street Ward Members are included in all meetings, consultation and decisions around phase two of the High Street regeneration project; |
Cllr Stephen Paine |
The plans will be issued to ward members for comment in December. |
December 2012 |
Lewis Small |
|
The use of grass to create green space in the lower end of the High Street is investigated to ensure that the final result was durable and sustainable both in terms of costs and appearance; |
Cllr Stephen Paine |
The current green spaces have been delineated on site in spray paint to gain an understanding of scale. Subsequently these areas are being reduced and following this the adjusted layout will be set out again on site. A visit can be arranged with ward members to inspect the setting out proposal if required. |
December 2012 |
Lewis Small |
|
Further investigation on suitable crossing at the lower end of High Street linking the river with the rest of the Town Centre is undertaken; |
Cllr Stephen Paine |
Proposals will be made in respect of improving the subway crossing. Due to budget constraints undertaking major improvement works is not possible under the phase 2 works; however, if tenders are below the allocated works budget then this can be investigated. |
|
Lewis Small |
|
It is clarified to Members the details and issues around the Traffic Regulation Order currently in place at the lower end of the High Street. |
Cllr Stephen Paine |
A written description of the Traffic Regulation Orders will be produced for the Committee. |
End of Nov 2012 |
John Foster |
Notes on the completion of SCRAIP
[i] Report recommendations are listed as found in the report.
[ii] Insert in this box the Cabinet Member whose portfolio the recommendation falls within.
[iii] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box either the acceptance or rejection of the recommendation.
If the recommendation is rejected an explanation for its rejection should be provided. The ‘timetable’ and ‘lead officer’ boxes can be left blank
If the recommendation is accepted an explanation of the action to be taken to implement the recommendation should be recorded in this box. Please also complete the ‘timetable’ and ‘lead officer’ boxes.
[iv] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box when the action in indicated in the previous box will be implemented.
[v] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box the Officer responsible for the implementation of the action highlighted in the ‘response’ box.