Contact your Parish Council
MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CORPORATE SERVICES OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
2ND SEPTEMBER 2014
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF POLICY AND COMMUNICATIONS
Report prepared by Sam Bailey
1.
REVIEW
OF COMPLAINTS APRIL-JUNE 2014 (QUARTER 1)
1.1 Issue for Decision
1.1.1
To
consider the Councils performance in dealing with complaints during April to
June 2014 (quarter 1).
1.2 Recommendation of the Head of Policy and Communications
1.2.1 It is
recommended that the Committee notes the performance in relation to complaints,
in particular:
i. The high number of complaints received about the Landed Festival held on Easter Sunday at Whatman Park;
ii. The increase in overall numbers of complaints as a result of this festival;
iii. The higher than usual number of complaints received about electoral registration, including the high proportion of complaints responded to outside of target time for this service; and
iv.
makes recommendations as appropriate.
1.2.2 That the Committee note the compliments received by teams and individual officers within the Council.
1.2.3 That the Committee notes the prominent themes mentioned on
social media during quarter 1 (attached at Appendix E)
1.3 Reasons for Recommendation
1.3.1 One of the Councils key corporate values is superb customer service; as such Maidstone Borough Council is focused on improving services for customers.
The Councils complaints policy recognises that we will not always get it right and complaints are not only a way of customers telling us when they are dissatisfied but also provide useful information that can help us to improve our services.
1.3.2 In order to ensure that complaints are being dealt with effectively and within corporate timescales it is important that a monitoring mechanism is in place.
1.3.3 Details of the complaints received broken down by service area, timeliness and category can be found at Appendix A. Complaints have been categorised, but many complaints will be about more than one element (e.g. both policy and staff attitude).
1.3.4
As
requested by the Committee at the meeting of 8th July 2014, any
issues picked up by the Committee will be recorded and included in the annual
review of complaints.
1.4 Quarter 1 Performance
1.4.1
Details
of quarter 1 complaints handling performance can be found in Appendix A.
1.4.2
During
quarter 1, 250 stage 1 complaints were closed, of which 239 (95.6%) were closed
on time. There was a 112% increase in the overall number of complaints received
this quarter compared to the previous quarter. Performance in responding to complaints
on time decreased by 2.7% compared to quarter 4 of 2013/2014. However
performance was 0.2% higher than the figure for 2013/2014 as a whole. A table
showing the comparison can be found in Appendix F- Charts and Graphs. The
figure of 67.2% of complaints being justified appears high, however it must be
noted that all 108 complaints about the Landed Festival were treated as
justified, pushing this percentage up.
1.4.3
A
table showing headline complaints performance can be found in Appendix F,
Figure 1. The number of complaints received was high this quarter, significantly
higher than Quarter 2 of 2013/2014 when the new waste contract was implemented.
Performance in terms of responding to complaints on time is down by 1.4%
compared to the overall figure for 2013/2014. The number of stage 2 complaints
received was relatively high compared to the numbers received quarterly last
year, however the percentage of those escalated to stage 2 was low compared to
the previous year. The percentage of stage 2 complaints that were justified was
also lower than the 2013/2014 overall figure. However these figures should be
treated with caution, as 108 stage 1 complaints were about the Landed Festival
and only four complaints for the Landed Festival were escalated to stage 2.
1.4.4
The
Landed Festival accounted for 108 of the complaints received this quarter. All
of these were responded to in time. This suggests that the increase in
complaints responded to outside of target time was not related to the increase
in number of complaints, and is a genuine decline in performance.
1.4.5 Of the complaints responded to outside the target time:
· One was about Benefits
· One was about Development Management
· Three were about Electoral Registration
· One was about Environmental Services
· One was about Finance
· Two were about Housing Options
· One was about Planning Enforcement
·
One
was about Private Sector Housing
1.4.6
The
reasons for these complaints being responded to out of time included:
· Two complaints were closed late as further information was requested from the complainant; and
·
For
two of the complaints that were late, the customers were kept updated on the
progress of their complaint.
1.4.7
It
is worth noting the complaints policy states that:
All stage 1 complaints will be responded to within 10 working days. If we are unable to do this we will contact you to let you know the reasons why and keep you informed of progress.
Therefore those complaints that were closed later than ten working days mentioned in paragraph 1.4.6 above should be considered as being late but were still dealt with appropriately according to the complaints policy.
1.4.8
However
this leaves seven complaints that were closed late without a valid reason, and
without the customer being kept updated. These complaints were for the
following services:
· Private Sector Housing (1)
· Electoral Registration (3)
· Finance (1)
· Planning Enforcement (1)
·
Benefits
(1)
1.5
Complaints
by Service
1.5.1
The
services which dealt with the highest number of complaints were:
· Parks and Leisure (118);
· Environmental Services (which includes waste, recycling and street scene) (33);
· Housing Options (16);
· Development Management (15);
· Parking Services (15); and
·
Environmental
Enforcement (11).
1.5.2
Other
than Parks and Leisure, the numbers of complaints received by these services is
around the level that we would expect when there were no major incidents,
policies or problems that generate large numbers of complaints. Comparative
data for these services in the form of a bar chart can be found in figure 2 of
Appendix F.
1.5.3 Parks and Leisure received the highest number of complaints this quarter (118). 108 of these complaints were as a result of an event that was held at the Easter weekend called The Landed Festival, which was held in Whatman Park. Common themes of the complaints can be summarised below:
· That the festival was too loud, and could be heard as far away as Allington;
· The festival was held on an inappropriate day, as it was a religious holiday (Easter Sunday);
· The bass sound from the festival was disruptive;
· The impact on wildlife in the park;
· Residents were not given enough forewarning for the event; and
·
Residents
were not able to get through to the councils contact centre as well as the
councils Environmental Enforcement officers who were on site monitoring sound
levels.
1.5.4
In
response to complaints about the Landed Festival, the council apologised and
assured residents of the following:
· That the council would be more sensitive to religious holidays when future events of this type were proposed;
· The impact on wildlife was monitored throughout the day, however no adverse impact was observed;
· That the event organiser had adhered to terms of the licence, and that MBC Environmental Enforcement Officers were on site throughout the day to ensure compliance; and
·
The
event organiser followed the correct procedures in notifying residents by
advertising in the local press, as well as placing notices in the park 28 days
prior to the event.
1.5.5
A
copy of the letter sent to those who made complaints about the festival can be
found in Appendix G.
1.5.6
The
lessons learned from this event, and the complaints generated by it, have been
incorporated into the boroughs festivals and events strategy. This strategy will
be considered by the Economic and Commercial Development Overview and Scrutiny
Committee on 26th August 2014.
1.5.7
Despite
the high number of stage 1 complaints (108) about the Landed Festival, only 4
stage 2 complaints were received. This represents 3.7% of stage 1 complaints
leading to a stage 2 complaint. This, along with a high satisfaction rate (63%,
according to the satisfaction survey) for these complainants, suggests that
complainants were satisfied with the councils response to their complaint.
1.5.8
As
can be seen in Appendix E, the Landed Festival also generated feedback on
social media. Social media gives residents the opportunity to make positive as
well as negative comments. On balance, across MBC social media sites, feedback
about the festival was overwhelmingly positive. Of the 42 comments received:
· 28 were positive (66%);
· 12 were negative (29%); and
·
2
were neutral (5%).
1.5.9
Despite
high number of complaints for Parks and Leisure this quarter, all complaints
were closed on time for this service.
1.5.10
Environmental
Services received the second highest number of complaints this quarter (33). Of
these complaints:
· Seven were about missed general waste, recycling or food waste collections;
· Two were about missed green waste collections;
· Three were about problems with delivery of green waste bins;
· Six were about bins not being returned to the appropriate place or bins causing an obstruction; and
·
Three
were about problems experienced with bulky collections.
1.5.11
There
were no other trends in complaints for Environmental Services.
1.5.12 Housing Options received 16 complaints this quarter. Of these complaints:
· Eleven were about Service;
· One was about Policy;
· Two were about Staff; and
·
Two
were about Time Taken.
1.5.13 Trends noticed in complaints for Housing Options:
·
Two
complaints this quarter were received about problems that users had experienced
with Kent Homechoice, the councils bidding system for social housing.
·
The
complaint about policy was about the way the banding system works in the
Housing Allocations Policy.
· For the two complaints about time taken, one was about time taken to deal with a housing application and the other was about the time taken to respond to an enquiry. Whilst there were only two complaints solely about time taken this quarter, other complaints about service also had an element of complaints about time taken within them:
o Two complaints about service also raised the time taken to process housing register applications; and
o
Two
complaints about service also raised the time taken to rehouse those on the
Housing Register.
1.5.14
Development
Management received fifteen complaints this quarter. Of these complaints:
· Seven were about service;
· Three were about policy;
· Three were about time taken; and
·
Two
were about lack of contact.
1.5.15
Whilst
there were no particular issues that generated a high number of complaints for
Development Management, the following general themes emerged:
· Frustration with the lack of contact from Planning Officers around live planning applications; and
·
Policy
complaints were expressions of dissatisfaction with the outcome of planning
decisions.
1.5.16
However
it should be noted that three of the fifteen complaints for development management
were upheld (one each for service, lack of contact and time taken).
1.5.17
Parking
Services received fifteen complaints this quarter. Of these complaints:
· Six were about policy;
· Five were about service;
· One was about discrimination; and
·
Three
were about staff.
1.5.18
Of
the six policy complaints:
· Two were requesting that CEOs use discretion when observing contraventions, however the customers were informed that this would be unfair and that any mitigating circumstances would be taken into account on appeal;
· One was about the increase in parking charges at Lockmeadow car park;
· Two were about the way in which the visitor/resident permit system works, particularly if the resident pays for a full years permit but has to renew in year due to the renewal dates being phased; and
·
One
policy complaint was about how renewal letters are sent out to multiple permit
holders within a household, despite permits being limited on a per household
basis.
1.5.19
Of
the remaining complaints for parking services:
· There were two complaints that the appeals section of the website was not working. In both of these cases, the complainant was directed to submit their appeal by email instead. The issue has not been fully resolved. However a message has been placed on the website to advise those making an appeal to send their appeal via email instead;
· The two complaints about staff conduct were both about Civil Enforcement Officers who were on patrol, neither of which were upheld; and
·
The
one complaint about discrimination was that there were not enough disabled bays
in the town centre. The response informed the complainant that those with a
disabled badge may park on single, or double yellow lines, as well as any town
centre car park in addition to specified disabled spaces.
1.5.20
Environmental
Enforcement received eleven complaints this quarter. Of these complaints, seven
were about the issuing of litter fines or the litter enforcement policy and the
other complaints were about unrelated issues.
1.5.21
Electoral
Registration received eight complaints this quarter, which is high for this
service. For comparison, Electoral Registration only received five complaints
during the whole of 2013/2014. Electoral Registration also closed three of
their complaints late. However it is worth noting that quarter 1 of 2013/2014
was a busy period for Electoral Registration as it was around the time of the
borough election.
1.5.22
Of
the complaints against Electoral Registration, five of these were from
residents who experienced problems with registering to vote before the election.
In response it was explained that, especially during busy periods, occasionally
forms can be mislaid. The response apologised for any inconvenience caused.
1.6
Stage
2 Complaints
1.6.1
32
stage 2 complaints were received this quarter. This is a high number compared
to the numbers received each quarter in 2013/2014.
1.6.2
However
the percentage of complaints escalated to stage 2 was comparatively low, at
12.8% (32 stage 2 complaints out of 250), compared to last year (17.4% of
complaints were escalated to stage 2 in 2013/2014- 95 stage 2 complaints out of
548). The percentage of complaints escalated to stage 2 this quarter appears
low compared to quarterly figures and the overall figure for 2013/2014. This
was because there were many complaints about the Landed Festival that didnt go
to stage 2 this quarter. Full comparative figures can be found in Appendix F
under figure 1.
1.6.3
If
the four complaints that were received for the Landed Festival (all classified
as justified) are removed from the justified complaints category, the
percentage of justified stage 2 complaints reduces to 21.4%, from 31.3%. This,
along with the fact that no compensation, payments or refunds were offered as a
result of stage 2 complaints suggests that whilst the number of stage 2s
received was high compared to previous quarters, this was not as a result of
stage 1 complaints not being investigated properly.
1.6.4
There
were no major issues that generated a high number of stage 2 complaints this
quarter, other than the four stage 2 complaints about the Landed Festival.
1.6.5
Development
Management received a higher than usual number of stage 2 complaints this
quarter. Only one of these complaints was found to be justified. Four
complaints for Development Management were policy complaints, where a
complainant was dissatisfied with a planning decision or a particular planning
policy.
1.6.6
The
percentage of stage 2 complaints that were justified in quarter 1 of 2014-2015
(31.3%- 10 justified out of 32 complaints) was lower than the overall result
for 2013-2014 (38.9%- 37 justified out of 95 complaints). However this
indicator has increased since quarter 4 of 2013-2014 when just 23.5% (4
justified out of 17 complaints) of all stage 2 complaints were justified.
1.6.7
Of
the 32 stage 2 complaints received this quarter, three were answered late. The
reasons for these complaints being answered late were:
· One complaint was closed late but only by one day;
· One complaint was closed late (by four days), but the complaint had been missed and only escalated to stage 2 after the due date; and
·
One
complaint was closed late (by five days) because the investigating officer was
awaiting further evidence from the complainant before the investigation could
be concluded.
1.7 Complaints Handling Satisfaction
1.7.1
A
breakdown of complaints satisfaction surveys can be found at Appendix B. For quarter
1, 58 complaints satisfaction surveys were returned. This represents a response
rate of 23.2%.
1.7.2
54.4%
of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the way their complaint
was handled. 7.0% of respondents were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. 38.6%
of respondents were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the way in which
their complaint was handled.
1.7.3
Despite
the large number of complaints for Parks and Leisure following the Landed Festival,
58.3% of complaints satisfaction survey respondents stated that they were
satisfied with the way the complaint was handled.
1.8 Safety
1.8.1
Nine
complaints were received this quarter regarding safety concerns. Of these, four
were considered as justified:
·
One
was a complaint that an Environmental Enforcement Officer parked on double
yellow lines to issue a littering Fixed Penalty Notice. The Enforcement Officer
in question was reminded of their responsibilities when driving a council
vehicle, and cautioned about future conduct;
·
One
complaint was about waste crews leaving bins in a position that put a resident
in a potentially dangerous position when returning home in their car. The
complainants property was put on a hotspot list, and no further complaints
have been received on this matter;
·
A
complaint was made after a child cut themselves in Mote Park and a cafι
operator refused use of their first aid kit. In the response it was stated that
the contractors in the cafι were not responsible for giving first aid, but that
the matter would be raised at the next meeting between the Parks team and the
contractors; and
·
A
complaint was made about the way in which a fall was dealt with by a hirer of
the market hall. The complaint response agreed that the incident was handled poorly
and that the Market Manager would take steps to ensure the hall hirers are
aware of correct procedures around accidents and near misses.
1.9
Discrimination
1.9.1
One
complaint was primarily about alleged discrimination or unfair
disadvantage for people with protected characteristics. The complaint was
against Parking Services. The complaint was that there was not enough parking
for disabled people in the town centre. The complaint response didnt support
this assertion, and outlined several areas throughout the town centre where disabled
people were allowed to park, including designated parking bays and single and
double yellow lines.
1.9.2
A
further two complaints were not primarily about discrimination, but contained
claims of discrimination. However neither of these complaints were upheld.
1.9.3
Ten
complaints were from, or on behalf of, complainants with protected
characteristics under equalities legislation. These complainants are identified
through what they tell us during the complaint process. For example, in the age
category a complainant may mention that they are elderly and that a policy
discriminates against them. It is worth noting that some complainants had more
than one protected characteristic:
Characteristic |
Disability |
Maternity/ Pregnancy |
Age |
Sex |
Complainants |
7 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
1.10
Improvements
made as a result of complaints
1.10.1 The table below shows improvements made as a result of complaints this quarter:
Service |
Complaint |
Improvement |
Council Tax |
No tickbox available for self-employed on a form |
Form was changed following complaint |
Grounds Maintenance |
Overhanging trees and foliage onto a footpath |
Trees and foliage cut back following site visit. |
Depot Operations |
A broken road sign had not been replaced, despite being informed it would be |
A new road sign was ordered and fitted. |
Customer Services |
A customer arrived at the Gateway at 17.30 to drop off some documents. However the officer would not accept the envelope as the Gateway was closed. |
The Gateway Team were informed that they should accept documents presented in this way. |
1.11 Compliments
1.11.1
Many
compliments have also been received by the Council this quarter. Complaints are
classified by service and can be found below, along with numbers of complaints
received this quarter.
Service |
Number of Compliments |
Number of Complaints |
Parks & Leisure |
1 |
118 |
Grounds Maintenance |
4 |
2 |
Customer Services |
5 |
6 |
Environmental Services |
7 |
33 |
Parking Services |
2 |
15 |
Depot Operations |
3 |
1 |
Economic Development |
2 |
1 |
Housing Options |
1 |
16 |
1.11.2
Many
of the compliments received were thanking individual officers for helping
customers with their enquiries.
1.11.3 Several compliments were received for the waste crews giving exceptional customer service by, for example:
· Asking residents whether their garden waste bin needed emptying when it was not out for collection, rather than not attempting to make a collection;
· Collecting household waste bins when they were not put out for collection; and
·
Waste
crews ensuring their vehicle did not block the road for a funeral procession,
and bowing their head whilst the funeral procession passed.
1.11.4
Many
of the compliments received were about the speed in which officers resolved
problems.
1.11.5 It is worth noting that those services with the highest number of complaints also in the main seemed to receive the highest number of compliments and are the services with high levels of customer contact.
1.12
Methods
of Contact
1.12.1 Complaints were received by the following methods of contact this quarter:
· 88 (35.2%) were made by email
· 15 (6%) were made face to face
· 16 (6.4%) were made by post
· 131 (52.4%) were made by telephone
1.13
Payments,
refunds and compensation
1.13.1 In total, £1026.42 was offered to justified complainants in refunds, compensation and offers of free services. This was all offered at stage 1.
1.13.2
Full Details of
payments, refunds or compensation can be found in Appendix D.
1.14
Social Media
Themes
1.14.1
Appendix E outlines
the prominent themes that were mentioned on social media during quarter 1. This
appendix was prepared by the Communications team. The pictures show how many
mentions each topic received, with words in larger text receiving
proportionately more mentions than words in smaller text. The information is
picked up by searching all social media posts for any comments or tweets with
the word Maidstone in. Those words with the text so small as to be unable to
read it received so few mentions there is little value in being able to read
them.
1.14.2
The value of
including this is that it can give a wider context to the issues raised in the
complaints report, by showing what is being mentioned online other than
complaints.
1.14.3
It must be noted
that this is a crude tool to demonstrate the major themes, and not positive and
negative publicity on social media.
1.15
Unreasonable
or unreasonably persistent complainants
1.15.1
There were no
complaints received by unreasonable or unreasonably persistent complainants
this quarter. However a large amount of correspondence was received by the
council from such complainants. For example in May and June, one unreasonably
persistent complainant sent 69 emails to the council.
1.16 Alternative Action and why not Recommended
1.16.1 The Council could choose not to monitor complaints handling but this would impact severely on the Councils ability to use complaints as a business improvement tool.
1.17 Impact on Corporate Objectives
1.17.1 Customer service is a core value and one of the Councils priorities is Corporate and Customer Excellence. Management, and effective resolution, of complaints is crucial to the success of this objective.
1.18 Risk Management
1.18.1 Failure to manage complaints in a robust fashion represents a service, financial and reputational risk to the Council. Regular reports are produced for CLT and also presented to the Corporate Services and Strategic Leadership Overview and Scrutiny Committee. Monitoring is carried out by the Policy and Information Team.
1.19 Other Implications
1. Financial
|
x |
2. Staffing
|
|
3. Legal
|
|
4. Equality Impact Needs Assessment
|
|
5. Environmental/Sustainable Development
|
|
6. Community Safety
|
|
7. Human Rights Act
|
|
8. Procurement
|
|
9. Asset Management
|
|
1.19.1 Financial Implications
All financial implications are set out in Appendix D
1.20 Appendices
Appendix A- Complaint Categorisation and Timeliness
Appendix B- Complaint Satisfaction Surveys
Appendix C- Stage 2 Complaints
Appendix D- Payments
Appendix E- Social Media Themes
Appendix F- Charts and Graphs
Appendix G- Landed Festival Response
IS THIS A KEY DECISION REPORT?
Yes No
If yes, when did it first appear in the Forward Plan?
..
This is a Key Decision because: ..
.
Wards/Parishes affected: ..
..
|