Contact your Parish Council
![](https://meetings.maidstone.gov.uk/SiteSpecific/mbc_files/mobbutton.jpg)
Agenda item
Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations
Decision:
1. That the site allocation policies set out in the Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations: Public Consultation 2012 document (as attached at Appendix A to the report of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) with the exclusion of SS3 be approved for public consultation subject to the following amendments:-
East of Hermitage
Lane
1.
After paragraph 3.16 add new paragraph: “East of Hermitage
Lane lies, in part, within an identified biodiversity opportunity
area (BOA). The Greensand Heaths and
Commons BOA, in which the north eastern portion of the site is
located, is characterised by a concentration of woodlands on the
Greensand Ridge where areas of heathy
vegetation and acid grassland are a feature. The larger field,
which is proposed for development, has been ploughed on a number of
occasions, although opportunities exist for targeted habitat
restoration and creation as part of the
development.”
2.
Delete paragraph 3.17 and replace with: “At the south western
end of the site is a smaller field with an area of protected trees
to the north east. The field and trees, which are to be retained as
informal/natural open space, offer the chance to create an enhanced
biodiversity corridor through and around the proposed
development. Retention of the smaller
field also allows a section of archaeological remains to be left in
situ, as advised by the County Archaeologist. The retention and enhancement of this part of the
site will also screen the proposed development from Hermitage Lane
and maintain the setting of Maidstone Hospital.”
North of Sutton Road
3.
Paragraph 4.10 following “and enclosure to development”
add: “The County Ecologist has identified the eastern part of
the site as having ecological potential so more detailed
consideration should be given to this area through the submission
of an ecology survey, incorporating mitigation measures, to be
approved by the Borough Council.
Existing landscape features within the site should be retained
where possible. Bicknor Wood to the north of the site and the trees
running along the eastern boundary are subject to tree preservation
orders (TPO No.37 of 1981 and TPO No.36 of 1981).”
4.
Policy SS2c add new criterion: “Submission of a full
landscape assessment and ecology survey, to be approved by the
Borough Council”.
Newnham Park
5.
Paragraph 6.10 after “views from the AONB” add:
“Of particular prominence is the hill to the north east of
the field located to the east of the stream, so development will
not be permitted on this part of the site.”
6.
Paragraph 6.15 amend to read “The medical campus will provide
for up to 200,000m2 150,000m2 of
specialist medical facilities”.
7.
Policy SS4(1) amend to read “Provision of a maximum
200,000m2 of specialist medical facilities set within an
enhanced landscape structure” and replace with
“Provision of a maximum 200,000m2 150,000m2 of specialist medical facilities set
within an enhanced landscape structure”.
8.
Policy SS4(2) before the word
“vicinity” add the word “immeadiate”.
9. Policy SS4(5) after “…use of the topography in site layout plans …” add: “to exclude development on more prominent parts of the site.”
10.
Policy SS4(7) amend to read “The
cumulative quantum of retail floorspace
will be restricted to the provision of up to 500sqm above that
which already exists and any additional retail floorspace above this limit must be complementary
to town centre uses and the need for, by means
of a sequential sites assessment, demonstrably require an out
of town location justified.
11. Paragraph 6.16 after the first sentence insert the following: ”As confirmed in Core Strategy policies CS1 And CS2, the regeneration and revitalisation of Maidstone’s town centre is a priority and the town centre will continue to be the primary retail and office location in the borough.”
2. That the strategic employment location identified around J8 of the M20 motorway is further considered by being included in the public consultation referred to in 1 above, to enable a more informed decision to be made on the allocation of strategic site(s) at this location and that the consultation should make clear the Council’s requirement that any strategic sites already identified to the Council at this location, in response to the advertisement of 11 May 2012, and included in the Sustainability Appraisal, or further promoted as a result of this consultation, should be accompanied by development proposals that respond to the relevant planning considerations, particularly landscape, ecology and highways and include evidence of dialogue with the public and their response.
3. That policy NPPF1: Presumption in favour of sustainable development set out in the Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations: Public Consultation 2012 document (as attached at Appendix A to the report of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) be approved for public consultation.
4
That the inclusion of dwelling targets for rural
service centres in the Core Strategy, and that the targets set out
in the Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations: Public
Consultation 2012 document (as attached at Appendix A to the report
of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) be
approved for public consultation:
· Harrietsham |
315 dwellings |
· Headcorn |
190 dwellings |
· Lenham |
110 dwellings |
· Marden |
320 dwellings |
· Staplehurst |
195 dwellings |
5. That it be noted that the Maidstone Strategic Site Allocations Sustainability Appraisal July 2012 (Appendix C to the report of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) forms part of the evidence base; and requests that the consultants (URS) be asked to provide a summary of the significant environmental effects of the options chosen and the reasonable alternatives rejected, as set out in the Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, Schedule 2.
6 That, subject to the viability testing of strategic site allocations and Core Strategy policies, the prioritisation of planning obligations agreed in 2006 be reviewed and final decisions reflected in the Core Strategy policy on infrastructure delivery.
Minutes:
DECISION MADE:
1. That the site allocation policies set out in the Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations: Public Consultation 2012 document (as attached at Appendix A to the report of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) with the exclusion of SS3 be approved for public consultation subject to the following amendments:-
East
of Hermitage Lane
1.
After paragraph 3.16 add new paragraph: “East of Hermitage
Lane lies, in part, within an identified biodiversity opportunity
area (BOA). The Greensand Heaths and
Commons BOA, in which the north eastern portion of the site is
located, is characterised by a concentration of woodlands on the
Greensand Ridge where areas of heathy
vegetation and acid grassland are a feature. The larger field,
which is proposed for development, has been ploughed on a number of occasions, although
opportunities exist for targeted habitat restoration and creation
as part of the development.”
2.
Delete paragraph 3.17 and replace with: “At the south western
end of the site is a smaller field with an area of protected trees
to the north east. The field and trees, which are to be retained as
informal/natural open space, offer the chance to create an enhanced
biodiversity corridor through and around the proposed
development. Retention of the smaller
field also allows a section of archaeological remains to be left in
situ, as advised by the County Archaeologist. The retention and enhancement of this part of the
site will also screen the proposed development from Hermitage Lane
and maintain the setting of Maidstone Hospital.”
North of Sutton Road
3.
Paragraph 4.10 following “and enclosure to development”
add: “The County Ecologist has identified the eastern part of
the site as having ecological potential so more detailed
consideration should be given to this area through the submission
of an ecology survey, incorporating mitigation measures, to be
approved by the Borough Council.
Existing landscape features within the site should be retained
where possible. Bicknor Wood to the
north of the site and the trees running along the eastern boundary
are subject to tree preservation orders (TPO No.37 of 1981 and TPO
No.36 of 1981).”
4. Policy SS2c add new criterion: “Submission of a full landscape assessment and ecology survey, to be approved by the Borough Council”.
Newnham Park
5.
Paragraph 6.10 after “views from the AONB” add:
“Of particular prominence is the hill to the north east of
the field located to the east of the stream, so development will
not be permitted on this part of the site.”
6.
Paragraph 6.15 amend to read “The medical campus will provide
for up to 200,000m2 150,000m2 of
specialist medical facilities”.
7.
Policy SS4(1) amend to read “Provision of a maximum
200,000m2 of specialist medical facilities set within an
enhanced landscape structure” and replace with
“Provision of a maximum 200,000m2 150,000m2 of specialist medical facilities set
within an enhanced landscape structure”.
8.
Policy SS4(2) before the word
“vicinity” add the word “immeadiate”.
9. Policy SS4(5) after “…use of the topography in site layout plans …” add: “to exclude development on more prominent parts of the site.”
10.
Policy SS4(7) amend to read “The
cumulative quantum of retail floorspace
will be restricted to the provision of up to 500sqm above that
which already exists and any additional retail floorspace above this limit must be complementary
to town centre uses and the need for, by means
of a sequential sites assessment, demonstrably require an out
of town location justified.
11. Paragraph 6.16 after the first sentence insert the following: ”As confirmed in Core Strategy policies CS1 And CS2, the regeneration and revitalisation of Maidstone’s town centre is a priority and the town centre will continue to be the primary retail and office location in the borough.”
2. That the strategic employment location identified around J8 of the M20 motorway is further considered by being included in the public consultation referred to in 1 above, to enable a more informed decision to be made on the allocation of strategic site(s) at this location and that the consultation should make clear the Council’s requirement that any strategic sites already identified to the Council at this location, in response to the advertisement of 11 May 2012, and included in the Sustainability Appraisal, or further promoted as a result of this consultation, should be accompanied by development proposals that respond to the relevant planning considerations, particularly landscape, ecology and highways and include evidence of dialogue with the public and their response.
3. That policy NPPF1: Presumption in favour of sustainable development set out in the Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations: Public Consultation 2012 document (as attached at Appendix A to the report of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) be approved for public consultation.
4
That the inclusion of dwelling targets for rural
service centres in the Core Strategy, and that the targets set out
in the Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations: Public
Consultation 2012 document (as attached at Appendix A to the report
of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) be
approved for public consultation:
· Harrietsham |
315 dwellings |
· Headcorn |
190 dwellings |
· Lenham |
110 dwellings |
· Marden |
320 dwellings |
· Staplehurst |
195 dwellings |
5. That it be noted that the Maidstone Strategic Site Allocations Sustainability Appraisal July 2012 (Appendix C to the report of the Director of Change, Planning and the Environment) forms part of the evidence base; and requests that the consultants (URS) be asked to provide a summary of the significant environmental effects of the options chosen and the reasonable alternatives rejected, as set out in the Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, Schedule 2.
5 That, subject to the viability testing of strategic site allocations and Core Strategy policies, the prioritisation of planning obligations agreed in 2006 be reviewed and final decisions reflected in the Core Strategy policy on infrastructure delivery.
Supporting documents:
-
Cabinet, Council or Committee Report for Core Strategy Strategic Development Site Allocations, item 54.
PDF 162 KB View as HTML (54./1) 116 KB
-
Enc. 1 for Cabinet, Council or Committee Report for Core Strategy Strategic Development Site Allocations, item 54.
PDF 6 MB
-
Enc. 2 for Cabinet, Council or Committee Report for Core Strategy Strategic Development Site Allocations, item 54.
PDF 3 MB
-
AppC_Maidstone Strategic Sites Allocations Interim SA Report_FINAL DRAFT FOR MEMBERS, item 54.
PDF 8 MB