As per the approved CIL governance arrangements, and in relation to the Strategic CIL Bidding Cycle 2021/22, this decision approves projects for the allocation of Strategic CIL Funding. Three infrastructure projects are approved for Strategic CIL funding: Junction 7 of the M20; Heather House community facilities; and St Faith’s Community Centre. These have all been subject to an external moderation report by Turley consultancy (Appendix 1 to the report) and internal officer preliminary evaluation (Appendix 2 to the report). Appendix 3 to the report sets out all the meetings held by the CIL Steering Board.

1.  That Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) funding that has been collected is allocated (as minima) to the following strategic projects for the period to 31 March 2025:

• M20 Junction 7 Upgrade - £1,836,729 in Strategic CIL monies, subject to appropriate due diligence by the Director of Finance, Resources & Business Improvement in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Corporate Services

• Heather House Community Centre Redevelopment - £956,420

• St Faith’s Community Centre Redevelopment - £250,000; and

2.  That a report evaluating the CIL process, including the proposed prospectus for the next round of funding, be added to the Forward Plan for a Cabinet meeting in the Autumn 2023.

The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) commenced in October 2018 and is governed by the CIL Regulations 2010 (as amended). It allows local authorities to raise funds from developers who are undertaking new building projects. The principle behind CIL is that most development has some impact on infrastructure and so should contribute to the cost of infrastructure. All developments within Maidstone Borough of a certain type and size are liable to ‘pay’ CIL which is due upon commencement of development. The Council developed a Charging Schedule alongside the Maidstone Borough Local Plan. The charge can be differentiated by geographical area, and by development type, and based on viability evidence within the Maidstone Community Infrastructure Levy - Charging Schedule 2017.

Infrastructure is needed to support the new development, and the Infrastructure Delivery Plan is reviewed on an annual basis with the latest being 2022. This highlights the infrastructure needed in the Borough to support new development (such as schools, health facilities, leisure, community facilities etc.) which supports the delivery of the adopted Local Plan. The Council is required under the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations (2019 Amendment) to produce an Infrastructure Funding Statement to include a statement of the infrastructure projects or types which will be or may be, wholly or partly funded by CIL.

Available Strategic CIL Funds

As of 1st February 2023, the Council had collected Strategic CIL funds totalling £ 4,280,886. We forecast that a further £7,495,282 of Strategic CIL may be available by 31 March 2025.

In addition to the money collected as part of the strategic CIL spend, the Council is making a further £5,000,000 available from the Capital Budget that it can use to top up the amount of CIL monies available for the delivery of infrastructure.

Bidding Process

On 8 January 2019, the Strategic Planning and Infrastructure Committee approved the CIL governance arrangements for the Strategic Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) spend. The CIL Steering Group was set up in June 2020 and met on 13 occasions between 2020-2022 (Appendix 3 to the report).

On 11 January 2022, the CIL Bidding Prospectus (22-25) was approved to allow for a bidding cycle for the allocation of strategic CIL receipts.

In line with the prospectus, bids were invited for strategic CIL funding from infrastructure providers in the period 3 May to 15 July 2022. Twenty-two bids were received and initially appraised by MBC officers. This was reported to the CIL Steering Group (established pursuant to the governance arrangements) on 13 December 2022 where it was decided that the bids and officer appraisal would be referred to a technical expert (Turley Associates Limited https://www.turley.co.uk/) for independent moderation (See Appendix 1 to the report - Turley Maidstone MBC Community Infrastructure Levy Allocations and Appendix 2 to the report - the officer appraisal).

Junction 7 of the M20

There is a clear policy justification for this highways infrastructure in policy RMX1(1) part 15(ii) of the Local Plan (Newnham Park – KMC allocation). Therefore, it is also included in the IDP in the “critical” list.

The s106 agreements from 3 housing developments along the A274/Sutton Rd when originally signed were to provide the full cost of the part signalisation works (£4.667m). Further s106 money of £3,250,469 (before indexation) is yet to be paid so a minimum of £4,723,884 is anticipated to be received.

The cost of the works identified by KCC is £6,621,610 and the shortfall from the s106 monies is £1,836,729.

There have been failed attempts to secure government funding for the improvement works in order to get them undertaken as soon as reasonably possible as payments would come later being tied to housing occupation on those sites. Therefore, and outside the CIL process, the Council intends to top up the residual amount (£3.25M) to KCC from MBC’s capital funding to accelerate delivery if this does not jeopardise recovery of anticipated s.106 receipts. For all the reasons stated above this represents a reasonable and deliverable choice of infrastructure project.

Heather House

Policy Justification: Policy DM20 refers to mitigating the need for new community facilities through conditions, legal agreements, or CIL. The IDP also has a category relating to this type of infrastructure. Socio-economic data strongly supports public sector investment in this infrastructure in this location and this is what MBC has chosen to with a recent planning permission (subject to a s106 legal agreement). The scheme is highly deliverable.

The total cost of the replacement community centre is £1,771,100 but it is estimated that this Council will generate income of £814,681 from approved housing development leaving the amount of monies from CIL to be £956,420.

St Faith’s Community Centre

Local Plan Policy DM20 refers to mitigating the need for new community facilities through conditions, legal agreements, or CIL. The council also commissioned (following a resolution from planning committee) a ‘Feasibility Study on the Need for Community Facilities in the North Ward – Maidstone’ (2017) which is listed as ‘additional studies and guidance’ on our website and states it is a material consideration. As stated above, this type of infrastructure is a category in the IDP. The socio-economic data backs the need for this social infrastructure and there is a complete vacuum in this area. Lastly, this is a highly deliverable scheme given that the external building works were completed last year and now the internal fit out is required.

The applicant has requested an additional £100,000 CIL funds as the build costs increased by £465k since their application was submitted May 2022.

MBC proposes supporting the project with a further £50,000 from the Springfield Mill S106 to be secured by way of a variation to the S106 in lieu of the community space in the Rag Room.  MBC have advised the owner Harrisons/Redrow they would support a variation to the S106 to this effect and MBC have been informed this will be submitted shortly.

MBC propose awarding an extra £50,000 CIL money in addition to the £200k originally requested as the CIL fund has the savings from the M20 project.

The total cost of the replacement community centre is £1,863,000. The £250,000 required from CIL is a modest amount in comparison with the amount of s106 collected (£ 471,760) and Church of England monies.

The Planning, Infrastructure and Economic Development Policy Advisory Committee considered the report at its meeting on the 7 June 2023. The recommendations made by the Committee are outlined below:

RESOLVED: That the Cabinet be recommended to:

1. Agree the Community Infrastructure Levy funding that has been collected be allocated (as minima) to the following strategic projects for the period to 31 March 2025 (figures are approximate and based on early February 2023 data): a. M20 Junction 7 Upgrade - £1,900,000 in Strategic CIL monies subject to appropriate due diligence by the Director of Finance & Business Improvement in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Finance & Corporate Services

b. A229 Linton Crossroads Junction Improvement - £1,232,000

c. Heather House Community Centre Redevelopment - £956,420

d. St Faith’s Community Centre Redevelopment - £200,000

2. Agree that Maidstone Borough Council and the Infrastructure Provider for the A229 Linton Crossroads Junction Improvement includes a time limited delivery date; and

3. Agree to reopen the Community Infrastructure Levy funding process with effect from 1 October 2023 to 15 December 2023 (10 week period) for a further round of bids to be received according to the terms and conditions of the process.

An additional recommended bid set out in the report and recommended by the Planning Infrastructure and Economic Development Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) for funding Linton Crossroads was considered.

This scheme was not allocated CIL funding at this time as though there was recognition that junction improvements here are supported by the adopted Local Plan on balance investment of CIL was not supported because

·  there was uncertainty over the ability of the Highways Authority to deliver the scheme which would tie up the funding;

·  other highway improvement schemes included in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan and supported by the adopted Local Plan were perceived to have stronger justification for progression to implementation and consuming resources at Linton Crossroads may prejudice progress on these alternative future opportunities; and

·  this was not felt to be a suitable course of action given that the Planning Inspector, as part of the ongoing Local Plan Review, had written to the Council supporting an additional site allocation in Coxheath close to the junction (Site LPRSA312) which may yield funding to improve the junction.

Putting a time limit on the funding being spent was considered, as recommended by the PAC, but was rejected in favour of re-evaluating the CIL bidding process and considering a round 2 of bids.