Contact your Parish Council
Decision details
Fees & Charges - Market Services 2011/12
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Leisure and Culture (post)
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: Yes
Purpose:
To consider setting the level of fees and charges for services within the remit at the Maidstone Market for 2011/12.
Decision:
1. That the Fees and Charges as set out in Appendix A to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services be implemented from 1 April 2011;
2. That the revised car parking charges as contained in Appendix A to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services be implemented as soon as practicable in 2011, following the due process;
3.
That the ‘non market’ days over the Christmas/New Year
2011/2012 period be agreed.
Reasons for the decision:
It is now the policy of Maidstone Borough Council to review fees and charges annually in line with the Corporate Fees and Charges Policy. Previously the review was more inclined towards ensuring the level of income generally kept pace with inflation. However, the review should now also consider:
Current performance;
whether the service being provided is a subsidised service; the
impact of the fees and charges on delivery of the council’s
Corporate Plan; the impact on the Medium Term Financial Strategy;
outcomes from customer surveys; the financial impact of the
proposed charges on users.
Another consideration
from the above approach is to ensure that there is an understanding
for market tolerance to fee levels and any proposed increases so as
to maintain and encourage new business. Reference to the above
considerations is contained throughout the report of the Assistant
Director of Environment and Regulatory Services.
The charges for the
car parking at the Market are set in accordance with Clause 11 of
the Management Agreement between the Council and MWB/X Leisure (as
Head Lessee).This provides that the car park will operate on a
short stay basis in accordance with the council’s charges for
pay and display off street car parking across the Borough, as
revised from time to time, or such other tariffs as may be jointly
negotiated between X Leisure and the Council with a view to
discouraging long term and commuter parking. The last review of
charges for the car parking at the market was in 2008-09 and since
that time similar other Borough car park charges have changed so
there is a need now to adjust the charges.
In accordance with the
agreement, X Leisure has accepted a 10p increase to the up to 1 hour charge and also the 1 to 4 hour
charge, with the over 4 hour charge remaining at
£4.60. The over 4 hour charge at the market
is already higher than the corresponding charge for the adjacent
Barker Road car park by 10p.
The proposed changes should enable the market budget for car parking to achieve its projected income for 2011/12. It was recommended that the new charges be implemented as soon as practicable in 2011 following the due process in readiness for 2011/12.
A further important
operational consideration during the next financial year is that
the Tuesday markets following both Christmas Day and New
Year’s Day will not allow several of the traders to source
stock for their stalls. It was therefore recommended that both of
these days are considered as ‘non market’
days.
Trading
Performance
The headline position
at present is that, overall, the market service continues to make a
surplus. However, the income from the market trader activity is an
area for concern with the on going trend of reducing trader numbers
and this will result in an under-performance against profiled
income targets for this part of the service.
The average no. of
traders attending the market currently is:
Saturday = 17 (20 at the same period in 2009/10)
Tuesday = 45 (47 at the same period in 2009/10)
The Tuesday Market has
continued to show the historic declining trend line to that of
recent years and this situation is generally reflected across the
region, and nationally. The loss of the Tuesday market’s
largest stall holder since June will result in a direct loss of
approximately £8,000 p.a. and although the Market Manager has
attracted some new traders to compensate this has been negated by
the loss of others and the down sizing of pitch size by others.
Incentives to attract new traders are used in the attempt to
establish a new offer and regular visits to neighbouring markets to
canvass interest and support is being maintained.
The average no. of
Boot Fair traders currently = 20
The average no. of Boot Fair traders to date in 2009/10
= 17
Boot Fair interest has continued to develop and is now a regular
activity on the site each Saturday. If the hall is not hired out to
a third party then the Boot Fair is held in the hall. When the hall is booked then the Boot Fair moves into the
Undercroft adjacent to the main
Saturday market. An initiative to arrange monthly Boot Fairs
on the Town Square on a Sunday during the Winter months is being investigated at
present.
The no. of hall
bookings currently achieved = 67
The no. of hall bookings to date in
2009/10 = 68
The market hall is the only area that has managed to maintain and
to improve its income stream. Bookings have provisionally been
received for as far ahead as 2015. The bookings continue to show a
range of varying activities, i.e. dog shows; cat shows; bird cage
competitions; archery practise; tool sales; toy sales; ancestry
fairs ; antique fairs and dog agility competitions etc. The reptile
show bookings this year were cancelled by the hirer due to their
inability to satisfy the legal requirements for ‘no
sale’ of the exhibits. . The
other main income generators are the weekly auctions that occupy
the hall for 2 days/week and these appear to be sustainable.
The majority of hall
hires at the weekend (Sunday) come from the dog show events and
these have not been excluded from the recent economic conditions
and some bookings have been cancelled. Investigations in to hall
hire charges in Kent show that Maidstone is still reasonably priced
and it was therefore recommended that the external hire fee is
increased, but that the charge made to the current regular hirers
remains as at present. This differential charge aligns the regular
hirers with the approach taken to the regular market traders on the
site.
Appendix A shows the
current level of charges and the proposed charges for
2011/12.
To summarise, the
expected year end position at present shows an estimated shortfall
in market trading income of £32,350 and savings of
£6,710 in expenditure. Officers will continue to identify
opportunities to mitigate the overall shortfall position of
£25,640 and will continue to provide updated
information.
Service
Subsidy
The table below shows
the original budget for the Market cost centre and confirms that
this cost centre is continuing to generate a contribution to the
corporate budget.
MARKET SERVICE |
Budget |
Year-end |
Variance |
Controlled running cost |
250,770 |
244,060 |
-6,710 |
Controlled Income |
-692,250 |
-659,900 |
32,350 |
Rechargeable costs |
313,600 |
313,600 |
0 |
TOTALS |
-127,880 |
-102,240 |
25,640 |
A further more
detailed analysis of the various trading elements of the service:
car parking; markets; rents; and income from X Leisure etc
has been completed to forecast the
longer term profitability of the service. This analysis suggests
that the direct market related activities consisting of the Tuesday
and Saturday markets; hall hire and rents will continue to operate
at a profit in 2011/12, but that during 2012/13 these elements of
the service may have to be subsidised.
Consequently, a more
detailed review of the service is being undertaken to consider
options for the future. This review will consider short term
initiatives to improve the trading performance, but will also
consider the facility as a council asset and its best use in the
future. Outcomes from the review will be reported to
Cabinet.
Impact on the
Corporate Plan
The council’s
vision for Maidstone is delivered in conjunction with the Strategic
Plan and embraces the Sustainable Community Strategy where there
are five priority themes.
Of these priorities
the Market service can be considered to support making
Maidstone:
‘a place to achieve, prosper and thrive’ - although
future significant development of the service is not on the
council’s agenda at present, it does provide employment and
trading opportunities.
‘a place to live and enjoy’ - the Market was first
given chartered status in the thirteenth century and as the county
town it has provided a market since that date in some form or
other. The recent surveys confirm that this service satisfies a
part of the community and that they believe the service is still
important to the town. It does give choice as well as a social
environment for its users.
‘a place with efficient and
effective services’ - previously the council has stated that
it would continue to provide this service provided it was not a
subsidised service.
Impact on the Medium
Term Financial Strategy
The
medium term financial strategy identifies income from fees and
charges to be at an acceptable level in 2010/11. Future assumptions
have been built upon slow growth predictions and allows for a zero
percent increase in the targets for 2011/12, but an increase in
later years of the strategy.
The
report identifies a shortfall in the current year and at this stage
officers will look to mitigate this situation, however if
the issue remains it will need to be reported to Cabinet as part of
future budget monitoring reports.
Customer surveys and
research
Due to the prevailing
difficult economic conditions affecting retailing and household
spend this year’s review has again included making contact
with several general market providers across England and especially
with our near neighbours. The general consensus is that they are
recommending minimal or no increase to the rents that they
currently charge and it is therefore recommended that a similar
approach is taken in Maidstone.
Most traders
interviewed stated that business was not as good as last year.
Competition from the high street through large multiples such as
Matalan, Lidl, Netto, TK
Maxx, Primark, Wilkinsons and
‘Pound Shops’ combined with the growth of online
purchasing through Ebay, Amazon etc has
had an impact on general markets everywhere.
During the year visits
to markets in Dartford, Faversham, Sittingbourne, Strood and
Sevenoaks have been made and both the operators and traders state
they are finding the current climate increasingly difficult to
trade in. Strood, with approximately 28 regular traders, seems the
most stable at present primarily due to its location in the car
park which overlooks the nearby Outlet Centre.
In addition to the above informal contacts and feedback a survey for both the Saturday and Tuesday market was completed in August/September. The surveys, whilst considered useful, can not be considered as statistically significant. The information provided was from canvassing customers using the service and information was obtained for the following key areas:
|
TUESDAY MARKET |
|
|
SATURDAY MARKET |
|
Gender |
|
|
Gender |
47% |
male |
|
59% |
male |
53% |
female |
|
41% |
female |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age |
|
|
Age |
1% |
Under 21 |
|
3% |
Under 21 |
19% |
21 – 40 years |
|
20% |
21 – 40 years |
32% |
41 – 60 years |
|
38% |
41 – 60 years |
48% |
61 years or over |
|
39% |
61 years or over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency of visits |
|
|
Frequency of visits |
51% |
weekly |
|
69% |
weekly |
18% |
fortnightly |
|
9% |
fortnightly |
14% |
monthly |
|
8% |
monthly |
17% |
rarely |
|
14% |
rarely |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfaction |
|
|
Satisfaction |
58% |
satisfied/very satisfied |
|
58% |
satisfied/very satisfied |
17% |
neither satisfied/dissatisfied |
|
9% |
neither satisfied/dissatisfied |
25% |
dissatisfied/very dissatisfied |
|
33% |
dissatisfied/very dissatisfied |
In summary the data
from the two markets shows:
- similar gender split for both days, though more males attend on
Saturdays than on Tuesdays – possibly to attend
hall sales or the Boot Fair, or due to not working on a
Saturday;
- young people are not attending the markets;
older age group dominating attendance (approx 80% over 41 years for
both days) – the markets are social events for
the older age groups who are also more used to attending this
weekly activity;
- the frequency of visits suggests a loyal following from those
surveyed - again suggesting that the markets are a
regular social type of activity;
- the satisfaction rating is perhaps surprisingly high
(approaching 60%) considering the change in the size (lower number
of traders) and choice now available at the markets –
again suggesting there is a regular loyal following,
however the high dissatisfaction rating must be noted also as this
shows the market does not deliver what many visitors
require.
In addition to the
above information details for address/postcodes of visitors was
also recorded during the survey. This will now be used to identify
common groupings using the Mosaic data analysis approach. Where it
can be identified that certain categorised groups are over
represented at the market, compared to their normal distribution
within the Borough, it will suggest that these, and similar areas,
are more likely to attend the service and will therefore assist
with target marketing.
Financial Impact of
the proposed charges on users
The proposed charges
are likely to be well received by existing traders and hopefully
can reduce the current trend of falling trader numbers.
An increase to the
Deadstock hall hire charge for one of
the regular auctioneers reflects the belief that this hirer has
enjoyed considerable benefit from the time allotted from a
historical base and it is the intention to redress this booking by
modest annual increases until it is more in line with the current
hall hire fees.
Where increases have
been considered possible then research has given some sound basis
for making such charges. This is especially true in the case of the
hire charges for the Market Hall. The increases are therefore
expected to have a minimum impact on the hirers or their ability to
pay the proposed fees.
Alternative options considered:
The alternative course
of action would be to amend some or all of the proposed charges.
However, caution must be exercised in seeking to increase the level
of charges above those proposed by the service manager’s
recommendations as this may result in customer (trader) resistance
and a lower level of income than is presently estimated.
Consideration for
reducing the stall fees has not been thought appropriate as it is
felt that any such reductions would be small and would be unlikely
to generate any significant number of new traders due to the
prevailing economic conditions.
Reason Key: Fees & Charges;
Wards Affected: (All Wards);
Details of the Committee: Market Surveys Sept/October 2010
Representations should be made by: 30/09/10
Other reasons / organisations consulted
Contacts on site
Consultees
Market traders; site hirers; site
users
Contact: Steve Goulette Email: Stevegoulette@maidstone.gov.uk.
Report author: Steve Goulette
Publication date: 04/02/2011
Date of decision: 04/02/2011
Decided: 04/02/2011 - Cabinet Member for Leisure and Culture (Cttee)
Effective from: 12/02/2011
Accompanying Documents: