MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
RECORD OF DECISION OF THE Cabinet
|
|
Decision Made: |
14 August 2013 |
MOTE CRICKET GROUND
Issue for Decision
Agreement to allow Mote Cricket ground trustees to sell part of land for development.
Decision Made
1. That formal consent is given to the advancement of the land shown shaded on the attached plan, being part of the Mote Cricket Ground, to Trustees appointed by and representing Mote Cricket Club to enable it to be sold to fund the facilities at the cricket ground.
2. That the Head of Legal Services be authorised to enter into an agreement to put this into effect and to enter into an agreement whereby the Cricket Ground trustees agree to relax the restrictive covenant which the Cricket Ground has the benefit of and which currently prevents Mote Park being used for anything other than open space without the consent of the Trustees (save for that part of Mote Park, excluding the leisure centre and its curtilage, which falls within 100 metres of the cricket ground).
Reasons for Decision
Attached as Appendix 1 to the report of the Chief Executive and Head of Legal Services was a note from the Cricket Ground Trustees setting out their reason for submitting this request. They wish to be able to sell four acres of the Cricket Ground (out of a total area of 24 acres) to a housing developer with the proceeds being used to build a modern pavilion with changing and bar facilities suitable for both cricket and rugby together with a conference suite. They hope that these facilities will attract the return of first class cricket but will also improve facilities for sport in the community.
The Trustees have approached the Council, in its capacity as representative of the residents of Maidstone, to facilitate this transaction. If Mote Cricket Club and Kent County Cricket Club both cease to exist before the 21st anniversary of the death of HM The Queen then the ground must be held for recreational purposes for the inhabitants of Maidstone. For this reason, the current Trustees need the consent of the Council as a contingent beneficiary to the disposal of the land.
It is very unlikely that the 2 conditions would occur that would mean that the ground had to be used for recreational purposes for the inhabitants of Maidstone, and even if it did, they would benefit from the improvements to the facilities funded by the sale. There would still remain 20 acres for such use, including the cricket pitch. It is considered to be reasonable to allow the sale to take place to fund the much needed improvements to the ground including the pavilion. It should be noted that the Council is not at present being asked about the merits of any housing development on the land. This will be dealt with by the Planning Committee in due course. Any decision relating to the current request will not prejudice the Planning Committee’s consideration.
The Trustees have agreed that at the same time as any consent is given by the Council to the advancement of the land, they will agree to relax the restrictive covenant of which they have the benefit. Currently if the Council wishes to use any part of Mote Park (other than certain areas where housing is permitted) otherwise than as open space, it must, in addition to the statutory procedures involving advertising such use and considering objections, obtain the consent of the Cricket Ground Trustees. Otherwise than for an area measuring 100 metres from the boundary of the cricket ground, the Trustees are agreeable to this covenant being relaxed, so that the Council’s use of Mote Park is no longer restricted by the covenant.
Alternatives considered and why rejected
The Cabinet could decide not to give its consent to the proposed advancement, but this would prevent the opportunity for significant improvements to sporting facilities in the Borough taking place. An opportunity to take control of what happens in Mote Park would also be lost.
Background Papers
None
|
Should you be concerned about this decision and wish to call it in, please submit a call in form signed by any two Non-Executive Members to the Head of Policy and Communications by: 23 August 2013 |