APPENDIX 2: PART A 
FOURTH QUARTER PERFORMANCE MONITORING
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Key to performance ratings

 

Direction

Performance has improved

Previous data not captured

Performance has declined

N/A

No previous data to compare

 

RAG Rating

Target not achieved

Target slightly missed (within 10%)

Target met

Data Only

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Summary

RAG Rating

Green

Amber

Red

N/A[1]

Total

KPIs

3

1

3

7

14

Direction

Up

No Change

Down

N/A

Total

Last Quarter

3

0

5

6

14

Last Year

4

0

4

6

14

 

·         42.9% (3 of 7) the targetable quarterly key performance indicators (KPIs) reportable to this Committee achieved their Quarter 4 (Q4) target1.

·         Compared to last quarter (Q3 2023/24), performance for 37.5% (3 of 8) KPIs have improved, and 62.5% (5 from 8) have declined1.

  • Compared to last year (Q4 2022/23), performance for 37.5% (3 of 8) KPIs improved, and 62.5% (5) of (8) KPIs have declined1.

 

 

Climate Transition, Corporate and Environmental Services Q4 Performance

 

Performance Indicator

Q4 2023/24

Value

Target

Status

Short Trend (Last Quarter)

Long Trend (Last Year)

Corporate Resources

Percentage of Non-domestic rates collected

98.39%

95.20%

Percentage of Council Tax collected

96.66%

95.75%

Percentage of vacant MBC-owned commercial space (excluding property for development)

 

Annual Indicator

Climate Transition and Nature Recovery

Percentage Change of Carbon Emissions from MBC Buildings/Fleet (Scope 1 and 2)

Annual Indicator

Improvement in Air Quality

Annual Indicator

Borough wide carbon emissions reduction (Gov Data)

Annual Indicator

Number of trees planted/size of area rewilded

Annual Indicator

Number of Electric Vehicle Charging Points Installed

Annual Indicator

Environmental Services and Enforcement

The percentage of relevant land and highways that is assessed as having acceptable levels of litter

96.95%

98.00%

The percentage of relevant land and highways that is assessed as having acceptable levels of detritus

96.01%

95.00%

Missed bins per 100,000 collections

54.0

40.0

Tonnage of household waste produced per household

0.170t

Percentage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling and composting

43.21%

53.00%

Contaminated tonnage (rejected) as a percentage of tonnage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling or composting

7.38%

6.00%

 

Climate Transition, Corporate and Environmental Services Comments (where targets have been missed)

 

Environmental Services and Enforcement

The KPI monitoring the “The percentage of relevant land and highways that is assessed as having acceptable levels of litter” missed its target by less than 10%.  Higher that average levels of litter were found in the High Street Ward, which resulted in target being missed. Targeted cleansing of this area was conducted within three hours of the survey being undertaken.

 

The KPI monitoring, the number of “Missed bins per 100,000 collections” missed its target by more than 10%, achieving 54.0 against a target of 40.0. Q4 covered the period leading up to the handover and termination with our previous waste contractors. This period was very challenging in ensuring that the service was completed as per the contract, as collection staff were looking to the new arrangements.

 

The KPI tracking the “Percentage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling and composting” also missed its target by more than 10%, achieving 42.05% against a target of 53.0%. And the KPI monitoring the “Contaminated tonnage (rejected) as a percentage of tonnage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling or composting” missed its target by more than 10%, achieving 24.3% against a target of 6.0%. Both of these KPIs have been impacted by new processes brought in by the disposal authority, Kent County Council, which has resulted in higher levels of monitoring and analysis of the quality of the recycling waste. This greater scrutiny by them has led to higher levels of rejections and therefore lower levels of recycling. Earlier assessment of contamination in the process has enabled the team to identify the areas where contamination is highest and then target these areas with new engagement initiatives, which include a ‘traffic light’ system of informational bin hangers in areas of high contamination, as well as articles and tips in the Borough Insight magazine to help residents understand what can be recycled. 

 



[1] PIs rated N/A are not included in the summary calculations.