Name of Review: ‘The Council as a Business’
|
The Corporate Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee wish to ‘explore the financial restraints the Council face and establish how savings and income could be generated in a more innovative manner.’
Ø Planning Ø Print Function Ø Back office functions and productivity Ø Recycling Ø Building Surveying
|
What equality issues will need to be considered as part of the review – giving consideration to the 9 strands:
When designing practical measures and suggesting savings the impact on staff and customers in relation to the 9 protected characteristics will need to be considered. The Committee will need to ensure they consider the recommendations in light of this.
|
Which witnesses are required?
|
Other ways to seek evidence? E.g. site visits, involving members of the public, consultation.
A roundtable discussion with the Chief Executive and the Directors of the Council (to include Corporate Management Team)
A Meeting with Building Surveying (David Harrison and Steve Goulette)
At a later stage in the review, a workshop session with the Business Community
Best Practice – Visits to Witnesses or written information
CLG – desktop research
Localism Information – General Power of Competency Briefing
Academic/Expert – NLGN
Federation of Small Businesses & LSP sub-groups
Local Government Act 1993
Public Consultation – roadshow, events and/or surveys
Staff/Councillor Survey on income generation ideas
Staff/Councillor Workshop
Press release to engage with the public
|
What information/training is needed?
|
Suggested time for review and report completion date
Interim Report for December to meet budget deadline 6-9 months
Full Report – Impact future budgets and savings
|
How does the review link to council priorities?
|
How does this item deliver CfPS effective scrutiny principles?
1 Provides ‘critical friend’ challenge to executive policy-makers and decision-makers 2 Enables the voice and concerns of the public 3 Is carried out by ‘independent minded governors’ who lead and own the scrutiny role 4 Drives improvement in public services
|
Any co-optees or expert witnesses?
|
* What do you know about the equality groups and the make-up of the people using the service or in the area? Qualitative and quantitative information
Think of the wider ‘community’ including people who possibly do not currently use the service but could or should.