MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
CABINET
8 AUGUST 2012
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT AND REGULATORY SERVICES
Report prepared by: David Tibbit
1.4.1
The
alternative course of action would be not to approve the updated Asset
Management Plan, and is not recommended as it is the duty of a well run
Authority to strategically manage its assets to reflect current and planned
needs.
1.5 Impact on Corporate Objectives
1.5.1 Acceptance of the recommendation will contribute to all three of the Council’s priorities – for Maidstone to have a growing economy, to be a decent place to live and corporate and customer excellence.
1.6 Risk Management
1.6.1 There is clearly significant risk in not having an Asset Management Plan, such as under-performing accommodation that is unsuitable for the needs of the Council’s services which could lead to service failure and reduced customer satisfaction; and inappropriate maintenance regimes leading to increased levels of responsive maintenance expenditure.
1.6.2 Risks associated with detailed asset/project proposals are dealt with as the proposals are developed in accordance with the Council’s risk management strategy.
1.6.3 Risks associated with investment income from property are considered when reviews are undertaken (i.e. Parkwood Industrial Estate) and when individual proposals are considered.
Other Implications
Financial |
X |
|
|
Staffing |
|
|
|
Legal |
|
|
|
Social Inclusion |
X |
|
|
Environmental/sustainable development |
X |
|
|
Community safety |
X |
|
|
Human Rights Act |
|
Procurement |
|
Asset Management |
|
1.7.1 Successful implementation of the Asset Management Plan assists in a more economic and efficient use of assets.
1.7.2 Measures are included in the plan to ensure that the Council’s assets remain accessible.
1.7.3 The Plan addresses the impact of the Council’s use of energy and water.
1.7.4 Health & Safety of the community and staff in such issues as the management of asbestos, the risk of legionnella infection, the security of buildings etc., will continue to be managed.
1.7 Background Documents
1.8.1 There are none.
IS THIS A KEY DECISION REPORT?
Yes X
If yes, when did it first appear in the Forward Plan?
February 2012
This is a Key Decision because it is a Policy Framework Document
Wards/Parishes affected: All |