SCRUTINY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SCRAIP)
Committee: Regeneration & Economic Development Overview & Scrutiny Committee
Meeting Date: 23 July 2012
Minute №: 17, 18 & 19
Topic: Core Strategy: Site Allocations & Public Participation
Draft Integrated Transport Strategy
|
Recommendation[i] |
Cabinet Member[ii] |
Response[iii]
|
Timetable[iv] |
Lead Officer[v] |
|
Consultation with neighbouring districts is undertaken as per the legislation and that Cabinet put in place a methodology for public consultation. (Site allocations and ITS) |
Cllr Paine |
1. Officer engagement with neighbouring local authorities (duty to cooperate) commenced April 2012 and is ongoing. 2. All Members to be advised of the focused public consultation events for strategic site allocations and the draft ITS. To include, for example:
|
19th April 2012 onwards
w/c 13th August 2012 |
Rob Jarman
Rob Jarman/ Sue Whiteside |
|
Approximate figures for jobs are provided in the document alongside employment square footage. (Site Allocations) |
Cllr Paine |
Recommendation was not agreed by Cabinet - ref. decision 25 July 2012 Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations report and Core Strategy Public Participation: Key Issues and Responses report item 1(i). |
N/A |
N/A |
|
The option to install a bus lane on the A274 be re-assessed (ITS) |
Cllr Paine |
Recommendation was not agreed by Cabinet - ref. decision 25 July 2012 Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations report and draft ITS report |
N/A |
N/A |
|
That recommendation 2 of the public participation report be amended to say: Reject Junction 8 of the M20 motorway as a Strategic Development Site location for industrial and warehouse development, together with premium office development and do not allocate land for development in the Core Strategy to be guided by an approved development brief. |
Cllr Paine |
Cabinet decision 25 July 2012:
“That the strategic employment location identified around J8 of the M20 motorway is further considered by being included in the public consultation referred to in 1 above, to enable a more informed decision to be made on the allocation of strategic site(s) at this location and that the consultation should make clear the Council’s requirement that any strategic sites already identified to the Council at this location, in response to the advertisement of 11 May 2012, and included in the Sustainability Appraisal, or further promoted as a result of this consultation, should be accompanied by development proposals that respond to the relevant planning considerations, particularly landscape, ecology and highways and include evidence of dialogue with the public and their response.”
Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations consultation document to reflect decision. |
17th August 2012 |
Sue Whiteside |
Notes on the completion of SCRAIP
[i] Report recommendations are listed as found in the report.
[ii] Insert in this box the Cabinet Member whose portfolio the recommendation falls within.
[iii] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box either the acceptance or rejection of the recommendation.
If the recommendation is rejected an explanation for its rejection should be provided. The ‘timetable’ and ‘lead officer’ boxes can be left blank
If the recommendation is accepted an explanation of the action to be taken to implement the recommendation should be recorded in this box. Please also complete the ‘timetable’ and ‘lead officer’ boxes.
[iv] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box when the action in indicated in the previous box will be implemented.
[v] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box the Officer responsible for the implementation of the action highlighted in the ‘response’ box.