SCRUTINY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SCRAIP)
Committee: Community, Leisure Services and Environment Overview & scrutiny Committee
Meeting Date: 11/2/2014
Minute №: 98
Topic: Refresh of Maidstone Protocols for Crime and Disorder Reduction partnership overview and scrutiny
|
Recommendation[i] |
Cabinet Member[ii] |
Response[iii]
|
Timetable[iv] |
Lead Officer[v] |
|
The Committee recommended that the revisions to the Maidstone Protocols for the Crime and Disorder Reductions Partnership Overview and Scrutiny as set out in Appendix A be agreed by full Council. The Committee also recommended the inclusion of the following paragraph:
‘Maidstone’s Crime and Disorder Overview and Scrutiny Committee will invite the Kent Police Authority to attend committee meetings when items on community safety are being considered.’
|
N/A Full Council |
A report will to be drafted for the April Council meeting.
This will highlight the revisions recommended by the Committee subject to the following paragraph being updated for correctness -
‘Maidstone’s Crime and Disorder Overview and Scrutiny Committee will invite the Chief Inspector from Kent Police (Maidstone) to attend committee meetings when items on community safety are being considered.’
|
Christian Scade to draft report to Council |
Notes on the completion of SCRAIP
[i] Report recommendations are listed as found in the report.
[ii] Insert in this box the Cabinet Member whose portfolio the recommendation falls within.
[iii] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box either the acceptance or rejection of the recommendation.
If the recommendation is rejected an explanation for its rejection should be provided. The ‘timetable’ and ‘lead officer’ boxes can be left blank
If the recommendation is accepted an explanation of the action to be taken to implement the recommendation should be recorded in this box. Please also complete the ‘timetable’ and ‘lead officer’ boxes.
[iv] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box when the action in indicated in the previous box will be implemented.
[v] The Officer/Cabinet Member responsible for responding to the recommendation should indicate in this box the Officer responsible for the implementation of the action highlighted in the ‘response’ box.