Decision details

Kent Life

Decision Maker: Cobtree Manor Estate Charity Committee

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

To consider the possible management of the Kent Life Museum attraction and entering into an agreement for a company to operate this facility on behalf of the Cobtree Manor Estate, a charitable trust (CMET).

 

Decision:

1.  That the Heads of Terms of the agreement to be entered into in relation to the operation of the Kent Life Museum attraction on behalf of CMET, as set out in the exempt Appendix to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services, be approved.

 

2.  That the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services be given delegated authority, in consultation with the Chairman of the Cobtree Manor Estate Charity Committee, to authorise the Head of Legal Services to enter into an agreement with Continuum Kent Life Ltd. (Continuum) to operate the Kent Life Museum facility on behalf of CMET on the basis of the Heads of Terms referred to above.

 

3.  That the Officers be thanked for their work on this initiative.

 

Reasons for the decision:

The CMET owns large areas of land to the south of Forstal Road as shown on Plan 1 attached to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services.  The land is sub-let to KCC which has sub-let it to the Museum of Kent Life Trust (MKLT).  MKLT has entered into an agreement with Continuum to operate the Kent Life Museum attraction on its behalf on much of this land and as shown on Plan 2 attached to the report (“the site”).  Although the site includes land to the north of the motorway, it is understood these fields have been little used by either MKLT or Continuum when operating the Museum.

 

The agreement between MKLT and Continuum contains a break clause allowing Continuum at a certain specified time to give notice to close the Kent Life Museum if it is making a loss.  Continuum gave that notice to MKLT and the facility will close in February 2013 with over 30 job losses unless other arrangements are made.  The MKLT agreement allows Continuum to remove the play equipment with a book value of around £180K at the end of the notice period.

 

Based on the Borough Council’s experiences with trusts it has been possible to develop a new way of operating which would allow more income to be retained and which should allow Continuum to continue to operate the site without making a loss.  The proposal is for CMET to become the facility manager and all income would be paid to CMET.  CMET would then enter into an operating agreement with Continuum for the company to operate the site on its behalf.

 

In order for this to become possible, the sub-leases granted to MKLT and KCC need to be surrendered.  MKLT has already agreed to surrender its sub-lease to KCC and KCC is currently considering surrendering its sub-lease to CMET.  This has a positive advantage to CMET in that it regains control of a significant part of its Estate including the remaining land not actively used as part of the Museum.  The Borough Council is now preparing the surrender documents.

 

In addition CMET has to agree terms with Continuum to operate the attraction.  It would be possible to seek a new operator and the staff would transfer under the TUPE regulations, but this would be difficult to achieve in the timescales and Continuum would remove the play equipment which is a very good attraction at the facility (or CMET could manage the Museum direct).

 

The accounts of Continuum have been scrutinised in detail by the Borough Council's and the Charity’s accountants and they are satisfied that the company has been operating at a loss and no costs have been attributed to central over heads.  They are operating the facility in a sensible way, although it is felt that there could be ways to reduce their costs.

 

By CMET operating the site through Continuum the facility could be exempt from Non-Domestic Business Rates due to the charitable and museum status and certain elements of VAT could also be exempt for the same reasons.  The Borough Council’s tax advisors have confirmed that in their view admission charges and some other charges would be VAT exempt and the Borough Council’s Revenues team has confirmed that NNDR exemptions would be applicable.  This would provide more income and allow Continuum to continue to operate the site without incurring a loss.

 

Draft Heads of Terms have been agreed with Continuum and these are set out in the in exempt Appendix to the report of the Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services.  The Borough Council’s and the Charity’s technical, legal and financial Officers are satisfied that this represents the best deal given the complicated circumstances and if agreed will allow the Museum attraction to remain operating with improved likelihood of future success.  In addition CMET will regain control of the site and additional land south of Forstal Road.

 

A surplus share prediction provided as part of the exempt Appendix shows that based on current income a surplus could be shared by CMET and Continuum.

 

The proposed arrangements with Continuum whilst of benefit to all parties, do not comply with the Council’s Contract Procedure Rules as the normal procurement process has not occurred.  However, the Director of Regeneration and Communities has agreed to the waiver of the Contract Procedure Rules to allow the contract to be entered into with Continuum without conducting a competitive tendering process.

 

Alternative options considered:

The Heads of Terms could be rejected, but this would result in the Museum of Kent Life attraction closing with the loss of over 30 jobs, unless CMET manages it directly until a procurement exercise is undertaken.  However CMET has no experience of running such a facility and if it were to consider doing so the risks would increase significantly, not least to the CMET of which the Borough Council is the Corporate Trustee.  The proposal provides a benefit for both parties and is considered to be the best way forward given the complex set of circumstances.

 

Reason Key: Expenditure > £250,000;

Wards Affected: Boxley Ward;

Details of the Committee: None.

Contact: Steve Goulette Email: stevegoulette@maidstone.gov.uk Email: Stevegoulette@maidstone.gov.uk.

Report author: Steve Goulette

Publication date: 15/11/2012

Date of decision: 14/11/2012

Decided: 14/11/2012 - Cobtree Manor Estate Charity Committee

Effective from: 23/11/2012

Accompanying Documents: