MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL
Democracy and General Purposes Committee
MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON Wednesday 31 January 2024
Attendees:
Committee Members:
|
Councillors Cooper (Chairman), Cox, English, Forecast, Garten, Jeffery, M Thompson, Webb and D Wilkinson
|
60. Apologies for Absence
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Bartlett, Perry and Rose.
61. Notification of Substitute Members
The following Substitute Members present were:
·
Councillor
Forecast for Councillor Bartlett
·
Councillor Garten
for Councillor Perry
· Councillor D Wilkinson for Councillor Rose
62. Urgent Items
There were no urgent items.
63. Notification of Visiting Members
There were no Visiting Members.
64. Disclosures by Members and Officers
There were no disclosures by Members or Officers.
65. Disclosures of Lobbying
Councillors Cooper and English stated that they had been lobbied on Item 14 – Policy Advisory Committee and Overview and Scrutiny Arrangements, Governance Review 2023/24 and Item 15 – Amendments to the Constitution.
66. Exempt Items
RESOLVED: That all items on the agenda be taken in public as proposed.
67. Minutes of the Meeting Held on 20 November 2023
RESOLVED: That the Minutes of the meeting held on 20 November 2023 be approved as a correct record and signed.
68. Presentation of Petitions
There were no petitions.
69. Question and Answer Session for Members of the Public
There were no questions from members of the public.
70. Questions from Members to the Chairman
There were no questions from Members.
71. Committee Work Programme
RESOLVED: That the Committee Work Programme be noted.
72. Reports of Outside Bodies
There were no reports of outside bodies.
73. Policy Advisory Committee and Overview and Scrutiny Arrangements, Governance Review 2023/24
The Director of Strategy, Insight and Governance introduced the report and outlined the three options for Policy Advisory Committee and Overview and Scrutiny Arrangements following the workshop held and the previous Committee meeting. These included:
- Model
B (Cabinet plus Policy Advisory Scrutiny Committees), which had 11 votes
at the workshop;
- Model
E (Cabinet plus Cabinet Advisory Committees and 1 Overview and Scrutiny
Committee) which had 4 votes at the workshop; and
- Model
A (Current Model – up to 4 Policy Advisory Committees (PACs) plus 1
Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC) which had 4 votes at the workshop.
It was advised that changes to the current system would need to be agreed by the Full Council and would require changes to the constitution.
The Committee had also included in their review of the governance arrangements consideration of a new constitution. It was advised that, if an easier-to-use version of the constitution was required, this would need to have input from Members and be presented to the Committee before a recommendation could be made to Council.
Some Members expressed that Model B, which had the most votes at the workshop, would provide a stronger framework for Member engagement and would be an improvement on the existing model. The model could be adopted before the May 2024 elections. Overall, it was agreed that the current model should be retained as it worked well, and that it would be detrimental to introduce significant changes to the governance model before an election. It was noted that the incoming Members could look to change the model in the future if this was the preferred option. However, it was requested that the PACs be reduced from four to three to make better use of time and resources.
Concerns were raised that elements of the current
constitution, such as reports from outside bodies, were not being properly
utilised and not outlined in enough detail. It was requested that officers
produce an amendment for the constitution for the next meeting as an additional
recommendation.
RESOLVED: That
- No
change be made to the Policy Advisory Committee and Overview and Scrutiny
arrangements; and
- The existing Constitution remain.
74. Amendments to the Constitution
The Director of Strategy, Insight and Governance
introduced the report and outlined that there was a list of minor amendments to
be implemented using the Monitoring Officer’s delegation, and eight other
proposals for consideration by the Committee. Specific attention was drawn to:
- Change
2 – Motions of Notice (Council), which had two options for amendment and
would allow the Mayor to use discretion to deal with motions at Council;
- Change
6 – Visiting Members, which concerned the right of Visiting Members to
attend meetings moving into Part II proceedings, with additional wording
suggested to allow the most senior officer present to advise the Chairman
in the absence of the Monitoring Officer.
The Committee considered each of the other proposals individually:
1. Cancellation of Meetings – Agreed;
2. Motions on Notice (Council) – The Democratic and
Electoral Services Manager clarified that the changes proposed would allow
motions to be dealt with at Council without referral to Cabinet or a Policy
Advisory Committee, which it cannot currently do. In response to a query on
option B, he stated that the proposer could not be advised on how the motion
would be determined, as this was for the Council to decide. The Committee
agreed that Option B was suitable.
3. Petition Scheme – Agreed;
4. Members as Substitutes on Committees – Agreed;
5. Notice of Meetings and Business to be discussed – Agreed;
6. Visiting Members – amendment to Rule 7.3.7 to read: on
the advice of the Monitoring Officer or, in their absence, the most senior
officer present at the meeting, Agreed;
7. Protocol for receiving Overview and Scrutiny Committee
Reports - Agreed; and
8. Protocol on Honorary Alderman – Several Members were
hesitant to include ‘exceptional circumstances’ as it could be misinterpreted
and should be evident that it is not taken lightly. The Democratic and
Electoral Services Manager advised that there was no clear legal position on
Honorary Aldermen being appointed posthumously, but the wording would allow
flexibility. The Committee agreed to recommend the change, as it would prevent
the Council from acting against its own policy.
RESOLVED: That
- The
use of the Monitoring Officer’s delegation to amend the Constitution as
outlined in Appendix 1 to the report, be noted; and
- Council
be recommended to approve the amendments as detailed in Appendix 1 to the
report to:
- Part
C1 (Rules of Procedure), Rule 2.5 (Cancellation of Meetings);
- Part
C1 (Rules of Procedure), Rule 12.9 (Motions of Notice) in accordance with
Option B;
- Part
C1 (Council Procedure Rules), Appendix A: The Council’s Petition Scheme;
- Remove
the unnumbered paragraph following Part C2 (Committee Procedure Rules),
Rule 2.5.3;
- Part
C2 (Committee Procedure Rules), Rule 5 (Notice of Meetings and Business
to be discussed);
- Part
C2 (Committee Procedure Rules), Rule 7.3.7 to read:
‘on the advice of the Monitoring Officer or, in their absence, the most senior officer present at the meeting’;
- Part
C2 (Committee Procedure Rules), Paragraph 13.3; and
- Part E3 (Protocol on Honorary Alderman), Paragraph 2.4.
75. Duration of meeting
6.30 p.m. to 7.32 p.m.
</LAYOUT_SECTION>
<TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>
</TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<HEADING_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
</SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<TITLE_ONLY_SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
</TITLE_ONLY_SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>