COUNCIL MEETING |
30 SEPTEMBER 2020 |
|||
|
||||
REVIEW OF ALLOCATION OF SEATS ON COMMITTEES |
||||
|
||||
Final Decision-Maker |
Council |
|||
Lead Head of Service |
Angela Woodhouse, Head of Policy, Communications and Governance |
|||
Lead Officer and Report Author |
Ryan O’Connell, Democratic and Electoral Services Manager |
|||
Classification |
Public |
|||
Wards affected |
All |
|||
|
||||
Executive Summary |
||||
A review of the allocation of seats on committees has been undertaken due to an additional vacancy and a change of Group Membership.
|
||||
Purpose of Report
Decision
|
||||
|
||||
This report makes the following recommendation to Council: |
||||
1. That the allocation of seats on Committees be as negotiated by Group Leaders, the basis for the negotiation is set out in Appendix 1 to this report; and
2. That the wishes of the Group Leaders with regard to Membership of Committees be accepted. |
||||
|
|
|||
Timetable |
||||
Meeting |
Date |
|||
Council Meeting |
30 September 2020 |
|||
REVIEW OF ALLOCATION OF SEATS ON COMMITTEES |
|
1. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS
Issue |
Implications |
Sign-off |
Impact on Corporate Priorities |
There are no direct impacts on corporate priorities arising from this, but the Committees when in place discharge the functions delegated to them having regard where appropriate to the Council’s strategic objectives. |
Democratic Services Officer |
Risk Management |
See section 5 below. |
Democratic Services Officer |
Financial |
The Committees appointed having regard to the political balance requirements form part of the plan for the committee system of governance and as such there are no additional financial implications. |
Section 151 Officer |
Staffing |
There are no staffing implications. |
Democratic Services Officer |
Legal |
The Council must allocate seats on Committees to the different political groups to reflect the size of each political group – section 15 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989. Consideration should be given to the matters outlined in the legislation. It is possible to have Committees that are not politically balanced but in order for that to be allowed no Member of the Council can vote against a motion proposing it. |
Head of Mid-Kent Legal Services |
Privacy and Data Protection |
No specific issues arise. |
Data Protection Officer |
Equalities |
The review will ensure an equitable political representation in membership of Committees. |
Equalities and Corporate Policy Officer |
Crime and Disorder |
No specific issues arise. |
Democratic Services Officer |
Procurement |
No specific issues arise. |
Democratic Services Officer |
Cross Cutting Objectives |
No specific issues arise. |
Democratic Services Officer |
2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1 The Council has a statutory requirement under the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 to ensure political proportionality in the membership of Committees. As a result of the vacancy and change, the composition of the Council is as follows:
Conservative |
22 |
Liberal Democrat |
21 |
Independent |
4 |
Labour |
4 |
Independent Maidstone |
2 |
Total |
53 |
2.2 Appendix 1 sets out the changes to committee places on a proportionality basis. These results in adjustments required to maintain overall political balance. The Group Leaders are currently negotiating the seat changes required to achieve that balance.
2.3 Following the changes to committee places some adjustment to Committee Memberships will be required and the wishes of the Group Leaders must be accepted in this regard and will be made available once put forward.
3. AVAILABLE OPTIONS
3.1 The allocation of seats on individual Committees which achieves overall political balance is set out in Appendix 1 with negotiations to continue.
3.2 The Council will need to agree a final seat allocation at the meeting.
3.3 The Council has a duty to accept the wishes of Groups with regard to members and substitute members on Committees.
4. PREFERRED OPTION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
4.1 That the Council accept the outcome of the negotiations between Group Leaders once agreed.
5. RISK
5.1 The
review of the allocation of seats on Committees will ensure an appropriate
political balance in membership of Committees.
6. CONSULTATION RESULTS AND PREVIOUS COMMITTEE FEEDBACK
6.1 Group Leaders have been made aware of this report coming to Council and no additional changes to Committee Memberships have been requested beyond those outlined.
7. NEXT STEPS: COMMUNICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION
7.1 Once the allocation of seats has been decided upon, there is a duty to give effect to the allocation by making appointments to them in accordance with the wishes of the Group Leaders on behalf of their respective Political Groups.
8. REPORT APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Review of Allocation of Seats on Committees
9. BACKGROUND PAPERS
None