Decision details

Statements of Common Ground for the Local Plan Review

Decision Maker: Lead Member for Planning and Infrastructure

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Purpose:

The draft Statements of Common Ground (SoCG) relating to this report summarise the key strategic planning matters between Maidstone Borough Council and other bodies. The exempt appendices were considered by the Planning and Infrastructure Policy Advisory Committee on 3 November 2022. The exempt Appendices to this report are:

 

MBC, Lidsing Developers and Kent Downs AONB (Exempt Appendix 2)

 

Exempt Appendices 1 and 3 referenced in the report were unavailable for signing at the time of the meeting (MBC and National highways, and MBC and Kent County Council).

 

Decision:

That the Draft Statement of Common Ground between the Council, Lidsing Promoters and Kent Downs AONB (Exempt Appendix 2 to the report), be approved.

 

Reasons for the decision:

1.1  Pursuant to s.33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) when preparing development plan documents local planning authorities and county councils (in two-tier areas) are subject to a legal duty to cooperate with each other, and with other prescribed bodies (as set out in regulation 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (as amended)), on strategic matters that cross administrative boundaries. In order to demonstrate effective and on-going joint working, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires strategic policy making authorities to prepare and maintain one or more statements of common ground (SoCG), documenting the cross-boundary matters being addressed and to describe progress in cooperating to address these.

 

1.2  SoCG are written records of the progress made by strategic policy-making authorities during the process of planning for strategic cross-boundary matters. It documents where effective cooperation is and is not happening throughout the plan-making process and is a way of demonstrating at examination that plans are deliverable over the plan period, and based on effective joint working across local authority boundaries even if there are still matters to be resolved. In the case of local planning authorities, it also forms a key part of the evidence required to demonstrate that they have complied with the duty to cooperate.

 

1.3  A SoCG may also be used as an effective tool for demonstrating cooperation between the Local Planning Authority and those who play a part in helping deliver their Plan. This is pertinent to the Maidstone Local Plan Review, which was submitted to the Secretary of State for Examination in Public on 31 March 2022. The examination hearings are currently in process. SoCG are being used by the Council to demonstrate legal compliance in terms of the plan-making process, as well as to demonstrate progress in resolving issues of plan soundness that the Planning Inspector is considering following representations made during the Regulation 19 consultation and the examination.

 

1.4  This report brings to the Lead Member of the Planning and Infrastructure two of the draft Statements of Common Ground considered by the PI PAC on the 3 November 2022. The main topic areas or matters addressed by each of the SoCG presented in this report is summarised below, with a focus on key updates to existing SoCG where relevant. It is also important to point out that the SoCG process is iterative and has continued throughout the Local Plan Review examination process.

 

1.5  The Statement of Common Ground between the Council and Lidsing Promoters and Kent Downs AONB (Exempt Appendix 2) has the Local Planning Authority as a co-signatory covers areas around the proposed policy 6 in the submission version of the Local Plan Review, and proposed infrastructure improvements that would impact the Kent Downs AONB

 

1.6  The Statements of Common Ground between the Council and Kent County Council was not available for signing at the time of the meeting.

 

1.7  The Statement of Common Ground between the Council and National Highways was not ready for signing at the time of the meeting.

 

 

Alternative options considered:

Option 1: That the draft Statements of Common Ground attached at Exempt Appendix 2 are approved by the Lead Member for Planning and Infrastructure. This would allow these documents to be finalised and signed, in accordance with the agreed protocol, in order that they may be published as part of the Council’s evidence base for the Local Plan Review examination.  

 

Option 2: That the draft Statements of Common Ground attached at Exempt Appendix 2 are not approved by the Lead Member for Planning and Infrastructure. However, this would mean the documents could not be finalised and signed, thus potentially prejudicing national requirements associated with the production of the Local Plan Review and discharge of the Council’s duty to cooperate with other authorities.

 

Note – Exempt Appendices 1 and 3 were not ready for signing at the time of the meeting and were therefore not included in the available options.

 

Urgent item?: Yes

Publication date: 22/11/2022

Date of decision: 22/11/2022

Decided: 22/11/2022 - Lead Member for Planning and Infrastructure

Accompanying Documents: