Issue - meetings
Objections to Traffic Regulation Orders
Meeting: 10/09/2019 - Strategic Planning and Infrastructure Committee (Item 58)
58 Objections to Traffic Regulation Orders 
PDF 64 KB
Additional documents:
- Appendix 1: Proposed Orders Receiving Objections and the Recommendations of the Joint Transportation Board, item 58
PDF 39 KB
View as HTML (58/2) 10 KB
- Appendix 2: Full summary of the Consultation and Responses, item 58
PDF 258 KB
View as HTML (58/3) 239 KB
- Appendix 3: Maps of the Proposed Orders, item 58
PDF 3 MB
View as HTML (58/4) 5 KB
Minutes:
The Operations Engineer explained that the report identified proposed Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) that had received objections during formal consultation. At its meeting on 10 July 2019, the JTB had recommended to the SPI Committee that all TROs except for the West End proposal be proceeded.
The Committee noted that the proposals emanated from a public consultation, held by Marden Parish Council, regarding parking issues.
RESOLVED: That:
1. The views of the public and the Joint Transportation Board members be considered.
2. The Joint Transportation Board recommendations to the Strategic Planning and Infrastructure Committee, as set out in Appendix 1, be agreed as:
a) The proposals for West End are not proceeded.
b) The proposals for Pattenden Lane are proceeded.
c) The proposals for Church Green are proceeded.
d) The proposals for High Street are proceeded.
e) The proposals for Sovereign Way are proceeded.
f) The proposals for Sutton Forge are proceeded.
g) The proposals for Albion Road are proceeded.
h) The proposals for Chantry Road are proceeded.
3. The objectors be informed of the outcome and Kent County Council as the Highway Authority be recommended that the orders are made and implemented.
Voting: Unanimous