![](https://meetings.maidstone.gov.uk/SiteSpecific/mbc_files/mobbutton.jpg)
Issue - meetings
External Auditor's Progress Report and Sector Update
Meeting: 14/11/2022 - Audit, Governance and Standards Committee (Item 56)
56 Progress Report on External Audit PDF 140 KB
Additional documents:
- Audit Findings Report 2020-21 Maidstone updated 14 November 2022, item 56
PDF 6 MB
- MBC Auditor's Annual Report 202021 November 2022, item 56
PDF 5 MB
Minutes:
The Director of Finance, Resources and Business Improvement introduced the report providing an update on progress with the audits of the 2020/21 and 2021/22 accounts. It was noted that:
· Grant Thornton had now completed their audit of the 2020/21 financial statements. The Audit Findings Report setting out the results of the audit and the External Auditor’s Annual Report setting out recommendations arising from the audit on economy, efficiency and effectiveness had been circulated.
· There was no decision for the Committee as it had approved the accounts in November 2021 and delegated approval of any further non-material changes to the Director of Finance, Resources and Business Improvement in consultation with the Chairman.
· As set out in the Audit Findings Report, there had been some changes to the accounts, but they had not changed the fundamental figures within the accounts.
· In November 2021, the Committee had also approved the Letter of Representation setting out that the Council had provided the External Auditor with the information they needed to form their opinion. That Letter had changed in one minor respect acknowledging that there had been some amendments to the accounts.
· The final audit of the accounts for 2021/22 had not yet started, so there was no prospect of meeting the deadline of 30 November 2022.
Mr Paul Dossett of Grant Thornton apologised for the late circulation of the reports and advised the Committee that:
· The Audit Findings Report detailed the various accounting issues that had held up the completion of the audit. Local authority accounting was extremely complex. The accounting for capital projects had to be in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and it was a time-consuming process. Most of the time spent on the audit over the last six months plus had been about resolving these accounting issues. For example, the appropriate accounting treatment for construction costs relating to the Brunswick Street and Union Street housing developments, the arrangements for accounting for capital receipts and the calculation of the Council’s capital financing requirement. Amendments had been made to the accounts as a result of this work.
· The 2021/22 accounts would be updated to reflect these changes and as the audit of those accounts moved forward, the technical accounting issues would be addressed at the front of the process.
· He was required to advise the Committee that the External Auditor’s work on investment properties had identified one asset where the value had been understated by £211,000 due to an error in the valuation calculations by the Council’s external valuer. As the impact of the error was not material, management had decided not to adjust the accounts.
· Under the National Audit Office Code of Audit Practice, the External Auditor was required to consider whether the Authority had put in place proper arrangements to secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness in its use of resources and to report their commentary on the arrangements under specified criteria (Financial Sustainability, Governance and Improving Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness).
· The External Auditor’s Annual Report had provided a clean bill ... view the full minutes text for item 56