The Committee
considered the report of the Cobtree Officer setting out details of
the property performance indicators for the Cobtree Estate for 2012. It was noted that:-
·
A property condition survey was carried out every 5
years. A programme of works was then
set for the following 15 years. The
data set out in the Appendix to the report of the Cobtree
Officerwas not available at the time of the Asset Management Report
for 2012 as it was still being collated.
·
The most important data for monitoring purposes was the
condition category. This showed that
there had been an improvement in the condition of the properties
between the previous survey in 2008/09 and the survey in
2011/12. The percentage of floor area
in good condition had also risen since 2008/09.
·
The cost of the maintenance required showed a small
increase approximately in line with inflation. Total spend on maintenance between 2008/09 and
2011/12 (disregarding the capital works to Garden Cottage) was very
similar.
·
The split normally expected between planned and responsive
maintenance was 70% planned maintenance and 30% responsive
maintenance. The planned and responsive
maintenance split had improved greatly since 2008/09 with the
figures of 82% planned and 18% responsive being well above
normal.
RESOLVED: That the property performance indicators for the
Cobtree Estate for 2012, as set out in
the Appendix to the report of the Cobtree Officer, be noted.