![](https://meetings.maidstone.gov.uk/SiteSpecific/mbc_files/mobbutton.jpg)
Issue - meetings
Hackney Carriage Vehicles -Unmet Demand Survey
Meeting: 01/12/2016 - Licensing Committee (Item 48)
48 Hackney Carriage Vehicles Unmet Demand Survey PDF 98 KB
Additional documents:
- Appendix A - Vectors Unmet Demand Report, item 48
PDF 1 MB
- Appendix B - DfT Best Practise Guidance, item 48
PDF 132 KB
Minutes:
The Committee considered the report of the Head of Housing and Community Services setting out the results of the Hackney Carriage Unmet Demand Survey carried out by Vector Transport Consultancy and outlining the options available to the Council. It was noted that:
· The survey had concluded that there was no significant unmet demand for Hackney Carriages in Maidstone at present, and no compelling need to increase the number of Hackney Carriage vehicle licences on the basis of public benefit.
· Best Practice Guidance issued by the Department for Transport in relation to Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Licensing recommended that quantity restrictions should not be imposed.
· Whilst surveys commissioned by the Council in recent years had indicated that there was no significant unmet demand, there were requests from licensed drivers to obtain Hackney Carriage vehicles and they often stated that they were aggrieved that they were prevented from obtaining a Hackney Carriage vehicle licence due to the limit on numbers.
· The Hackney Carriage trade had stated that licensing more vehicles would affect their livelihoods, but case law stated that whilst this must be considered if it takes place, it was not in itself a justification for maintaining a limit.
· Maidstone was now thought to be one of less than a quarter of all local authorities which still restricted the number of Hackney Carriage vehicles. In most cases where quantity restrictions were imposed, vehicle licence plates commanded a premium, often thousands of pounds, which indicated that people wanted to enter the taxi market, but were prevented from doing so by the quantity restrictions.
· Where it was intended to delimit the number of licences available, a mechanism of quality control was normally introduced, and this was usually by specifying the type of vehicle that could be licensed as a Hackney Carriage vehicle. The standard in Maidstone was already very high and was limited to three types of vehicle: the TX, Mercedes Vito Taxi and the Peugeot E7 Taxi.
· The limit on Hackney Carriage vehicles currently stood at 48.
· In terms of the options available, the Council had the discretion to:
Maintain the current limit; or
Issue additional plates as it saw fit; or
Remove the numerical limit.
In response to questions, the Officers explained that:
· If the Council decided to deregulate and issue an unlimited number of licences, market forces would come into play to balance supply and demand. When Sevenoaks District Council removed quantity controls, concerns were expressed by the trade that there would be a risk of over-supply. In the event, the number of vehicles had increased from 191 to 199-209.
· There had been a limited response to the taxi trade consultation given the overall number of Hackney Carriage and Private Hire vehicle drivers.
· Issues of concern identified by the Mystery Shopper survey had been followed up and appropriate action had been taken.
· A standard formula was used to calculate the incidence of Significant Unmet Taxi Demand. However, given the projected housing growth in the Borough, the potential impact on the ... view the full minutes text for item 48