Issue - meetings
2022/23 Work Programming
Meeting: 21/06/2022 - Overview & Scrutiny Committee (Item 16)
16 Receipt of Suggested Review Topics (if any) and 2022/23 Work Programming PDF 159 KB
- Appendix A: OSC Terms of Reference (Excerpts from Parts A and B of the Council's Constitution), item 16 PDF 88 KB View as HTML (16/2) 11 KB
- Appendix B: Suggested topics for Review (Wider Leadership Team and the Executive), item 16 PDF 58 KB View as HTML (16/3) 21 KB
- Appendix C: Proposal Form, item 16 PDF 70 KB View as HTML (16/4) 8 KB
The Democratic Services Officer introduced the report and referenced the suggestions put forward by the Council’s Wider Leadership Team and the Executive, as contained within Appendix B to the report. The additional proposals received had been circulated to the Committee ahead of the meeting.
Specific reference was made to the statutory guidance applicable to Overview and Scrutiny, alongside the Council’s new governance arrangements whereby pre-decision scrutiny would be undertaken by Policy Advisory Committees. It was recommended that the Committee choose the topics to be included within its 2022/23 work programme to maximise the time available to approach and conduct the reviews, whilst allowing for flexibility.
The next steps in preparation for the 19 July 2022 Committee Meeting were outlined.
The Lead Member for Environmental Services was invited to answer questions from the Committee on the suggestions included within Appendix B to the report. Support was expressed for the Committee reviewing the Council’s enforcement in relation to its resourcing.
In response to a query on how many reviews the Committee would be able to complete over the municipal year, the Chairman stated that he expected two to three large reviews, supplemented by small reviews depending on the method chosen to conduct the reviews. The Committee discussed the topics contained within Appendix B to the report, with support expressed for reviewing enforcement generally. Consideration was given to the benefits of conducting internal versus external scrutiny, and vice versa. Several Members felt that the Committee should focus on areas within the Council’s direct control and influence to maximise its effectiveness, whilst the Committee increased its experience in conducting reviews. However, the importance of and ability to influence other bodies through external scrutiny was also highlighted.
In response to questions, the Head of Policy, Communications and Governance advised that the Committee might wish to conduct its reviews at its scheduled meetings, as it would not be conducting pre-decision scrutiny. This was a function of the Council’s Policy Advisory Committees. The various methods to conduct a review including spotlight reviews, working groups and evidence collection through internal and external witnesses, were briefly outlined. The staff resources available to support the Committee were currently reduced due to the two vacancies within the Democratic Services Team.
The Committee supported selecting a few topics to include within its work programme, whilst maintaining its flexibility for unexpected items. To narrow down the topics for scoping, the Committee decided to briefly adjourn the meeting to allow for informal discussion. The adjournment took place between 7.13 p.m. to 7.20 p.m.
Following the meeting’s recommencement, additional suggestions included:
· Water Management Cycle
· Safety & Enforcement (as a combined suggestion from the agenda papers and Councillor suggested topics)
A vote was taken on each topic and each Committee Member could vote for up to three topics. The four topics that received the highest number of votes would be scoped and presented to the next meeting of the Committee, for formal agreement as work programme items.
· Safety and Enforcement (12 votes)
· Water Management Cycle ... view the full minutes text for item 16