
Issue - meetings
MBC Response to the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review
Meeting: 12/12/2022 - Leader of the Council (Item 10)
10 MBC Response to the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review PDF 139 KB
Additional documents:
- Appendix 1: MBC response to the KCC Minerals and Waste Plan Regulation 18 consultation, item 10
PDF 158 KB View as HTML (10/2) 5 KB
- Appendix 2: MBC response to the KCC Minerals and Waste Plan Regulation 18 consultation (changes highlighted), item 10
PDF 158 KB View as HTML (10/3) 5 KB
Decision:
That the proposed response to the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review consultation, at Appendix 1 to the report, be approved.
Minutes:
RESOLVED: That the proposed response to the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review consultation, at Appendix 1 of this Record of Decision, be approved.
Meeting: 08/12/2022 - Planning and Infrastructure Policy Advisory Committee (Item 119)
119 MBC Response to the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review PDF 139 KB
Additional documents:
- Appendix 1 - Response to the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review, item 119
PDF 158 KB View as HTML (119/2) 5 KB
Minutes:
The Leader of the Council was present to receive the Committee’s feedback on behalf of the Lead Member for Planning and Infrastructure, and asked the Principal Planning Officer to introduce the report.
The Principal Planning Officer explained that the drafted response was to the second Regulation 18 consultation undertaken by Kent County Council (KCC) for the Kent Minerals and Waste Plan 2023-38. The consultation had been triggered following a change to the Plan period, updates to reference nature recovery networks and policy wording on circular economy, as well as reference added to Chapel Farm in relation to soft-sand.
Some Members of the Committee expressed concern that the response was focused on the problem rather than a proactive solution, and that wording should be added to the fourth paragraph of the drafted wording to emphasise the willingness of the Council to work together with KCC to ensure the plan could be effectively implemented.
However it was felt by other Committee Members that the response was a high level document and did not require further wording to be added.
The Leader of the Council agreed that the wording could be reconsidered to include the Council’s willingness to continue communications with KCC to bridge the gap between the Council’s current position and the impact that the updated plan would have.
RESOLVED: That the proposed response to this Kent Minerals and Waste Plan Review consultation at Appendix 1 of this report be agreed, and subject to further consideration by the Cabinet Member.