Issue - meetings
Revised National Planning Policy Framework: consultation
Meeting: 10/04/2018 - Strategic Planning, Sustainability and Transportation Committee (Item 196)
Minutes:
Mrs Sarah Lee, Principal Planning Officer (Strategic Planning), presented a report to the Committee which outlined the Council’s proposed response to the government’s consultations on proposed revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework and Supporting Housing Delivery through Developer Contributions.
Mrs Lee outlined the Council’s proposed response to the proposed revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework. The Committee made the following comments about the proposals and the Council’s proposed response:
·
The requirement to plan for unmet housing need in
other areas and the requirement to factor in affordability uplift
could result in Maidstone needing to accommodate both due to its
location and affordability issues.
·
Therefore the consultation response should state
that those authorities who are subject to factoring in a 40% affordability uplift must not also be subject
to unmet need from other areas. A combination of affordability
uplift and unmet need should not exceed 40% of the
authority’s proposed housing figure, and any subsequent or
excess unmet need over this figure should be transferred to a
neighbouring authority.
·
Statements of Common Ground would be difficult to
agree if neighbouring authorities had different objectives in their
local plans.
·
The Housing Delivery Test was seen as unfair as it
relied on developers building out permissions, something that Local
Authorities had little control over.
· The provision of a housing requirement figure for neighbourhood plan areas derived from the authority’s housing need figure was welcomed.
Mrs Lee explained the Council’s proposed response to the consultation on Supporting Housing Delivery through Developer Contributions. The Committee noted the contents of the proposed response and requested that an emphasis be placed on ensuring that the Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 Contributions could be used more flexibly when major infrastructure was required to support large housing sites.
In summary, the Committee supported the suggested response by Officers but requested that the areas of objection to the proposals in the consultation were worded more robustly.
RESOLVED:
1. That the responses set out in paragraphs 1.5 to 1.37 be agreed as a basis for the Council’s consultation response to the revised National Planning Policy Framework, subject to the inclusion of the comments of the Committee contained in the minutes.
2. That the responses set out in paragraphs 1.40 to 1.53 be agreed as a basis for the Council’s consultation response to ‘Supporting housing delivery through developer contributions’, subject to the inclusion of the comments of the Committee contained in the minutes.
Voting: For - 8 Against - 1 Abstentions - 0