Agenda and minutes
Venue: Town Hall, High Street, Maidstone
Contact: Caroline Matthews 01622 602743
Apologies for Absence
Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Cox.
Notification of Substitute Members
It was noted that Councillor Joy was substituting for Councillor Cox.
There were no urgent items.
Change of Order of Business
The Chairman informed the Committee that he wished to change the order on the agenda as set out below:-
Agenda Item 13 – Cobtree Manor Park – Car Park Improvement
Agenda Item 15 – UKPN Increase Cost and Wayleave
Agenda Item 12 – Cobtree Manor Estate Financial Position
Agenda Item 14 – Cobtree Manor Estate Update Report
Notification of Visiting Members
There were no Visiting Members.
Disclosures by Members and Officers
There were no disclosures by Members or Officers.
Disclosures of Lobbying
There were no disclosures of lobbying.
RESOLVED: That all items be taken in public as proposed.
RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 25 April 2018 be approved as a correct record and signed subject to:-
Minute 72 – Cobtree Manor Estate Budgets 2018/19 – the last paragraph should read: The Committee requested that a memorandum of understanding be produced between the Council and this Committee based upon the derivation of cross charges.
RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 22 May 2018 be approved as a correct record and signed.
Presentation of Petitions
There were no petitions.
Questions and answer session for members of the public
There were no questions from members of the public.
Ms Hudd, the Head of Regeneration and Economic Development introduced her report on the Cobtree Manor Park – Car Park Improvement update.
The Committee were reminded that plans for the car park improvement works had originally been agreed in July 2017 and following a procurement exercise the Committee agreed in January 2018 to the appointment of a main contractor to undertake the car park improvement works and for the appointment of a Project Manager to oversee the works.
Ms Hudd advised that an independent Project Manager, Mr Nick Baster, from Logic PM was appointed to help bring the project forward. However, on reviewing the tender documents he highlighted that there was potential shortcomings with the design information that, if the scheme had progressed on the tendered basis, this could have led to the car park continuing to experience the issues that currently occur, such as being very wet in the winter months and very dry in the summer months.
It was noted that the required surveys had not been undertaken at the outset and these had now been commissioned via the project management consultant. The results suggested that new drainage and surface formation needed to be considered. This information was put to the successful contractor who advised that these additional works would necessitate additional materials and time which could potentially double the value of the contract.
In considering the report, the Committee requested that a report be brought back following the tendering process.
In response to questions from Members, Mr Baster advised:-
That there had been shortcomings in the original
design, principally no information on the weight bearing of the
road and the general terrain of the car park.
That a performance bond could be included in the new
tender but this would have an additional cost associated with
That soft market testing has revealed that the
tender sum should come in relatively close to the original sum
That the types of material to be used on the car
park reflecting the setting of the park would be included in the
The overflow car park would be a separate item in
the tender document.
That the tender exercise be re-run for the
Cobtree car park improvement works as a
design and build contract which would see the design liability
placed upon the contractor, relieving the Council of
That an additional £10,000 budget be agreed to
appoint an Employers Agent to manage the design and build tender
process and the appointed contractor and for an additional
£6,000 to be allocated for the Council’s project
That a further report be brought back to the
Committee following the tendering process.
Mr Laurence Tricker, the Programme Manager, presented his report which sought approval from the Committee to accept the new quotation from UK Power Networks (UKPN) and the increased costs for the installation of an electric power cable to the Cobtree Visitor Centre.
The Committee was informed that they had previously agreed to the installation of a new power cable by UKPN in January 2018. The quotation was only valid for 90 days and owing to the delay in commencing the contract with the external café operator the original quotation from UKPN was no longer valid. The new quotation obtained was £2,239 higher than the original one. UKPN had advised that the increase was due to the fact that it would be a different contractor and their fees had changed.
It was noted that the operator of the café had agreed to contribute to these costs over the period of their lease via an uplift of £2,900 in their annual rent which would be ongoing once the works had been completed.
In response to a question from a Member, Officers confirmed that the route for the cable would not go through the car park.
That the increased cost for the installation of the
power cable of £2,239 be agreed.
2) That delegated authority be given to the Head of Mid Kent Legal Services to enter into contracts and any other necessary agreements for a new power supply to the Cobtree Visitor Centre based on the revised costs.
Mr Paul Holland, the Senior Finance Manager (Client), presented a report to the Committee which set out the current financial position of the Estate as at 30 June 2018.
The Committee noted the following:-
Golf Course – There were no particular issues arising
Manor Park – There had been a small overspend due to some tree clearance works which had been required for highways compliance purposes and additional costs associated with the recent break-ins at the Café/Visitor Centre.
Kent Life – Following the change to the payment profile for the annual management fee, two instalments would be paid in arrears in September and April.
Café/Visitor Centre – There had been an overspend in the staffing budget prior to the handover to DAGT. This had been due to a shortage of staff and paying overtime had been the only solution to enable the facility to remain open. There had been a number of additional repairs and maintenance costs associated with the recent break-ins.
However, it was noted that some of the costs could be recovered as part of the insurance claims that are in progress for these incidents.
Settlement – An adjustment would be made to the budget following the
sum written off which would have an adverse impact on the resources
available to the Trust.
In response to questions from Members, Officers advised that:-
The Trust should be able to recover some if not all
of the overspend from the insurance claim for the
· That the grounds work tended to be loaded at the beginning of the year and there were no additional works planned.
VAT – Mr Holland confirmed that VAT rules state that rental contracts are classed as exempt for VAT purposes. However, any VAT charged on associated supplies of goods and services that are directly attributable to the activities of the estate cannot be reclaimed by the Trust. Although VAT can be reclaimed on the car park and the Café/Visitor Centre.
Recharges - The Committee expressed concern about the amount of recharges that were attributed to the Trust and in response Ms Dawn Hudd, the Head of Regeneration and Economic Development, felt that some of these would diminish as there were only two members of staff now directly employed by the Council.
The Chairman advised that the Audit, Governance and Standards Committee had already requested that a Members Briefing session be held before the November meeting of that Committee to discuss the whole element of recharges across the Council.
Financial Management System – The Committee noted that following the External Auditors’ recommendation that the Trust should have a separate financial management system, the Sage accounting package was identified as being the most suitable. A dedicated resource within the finance team to progress implementation had been identified and a project plan drawn up.
However, it was noted that the previous costs quoted by Agresso had revealed that the cost of that system may be less expensive than previously advised. Mr Holland advised that a revised costing ... view the full minutes text for item 20.
The Committee considered the report of Ms Elizabeth Buckingham, the Cobtree Manager.
Ms Buckingham highlighted the activities of the Cobtree Manor Park during the period April to July 2018.
In response to questions from Members, Officers advised that:-
Ms Buckingham had been liaising with the
Council’s ICT Section to recover the previous data for
That a meeting would be set up with Ward Members,
adjacent Ward Members and Members and Substitute Members of this
Committee to meet with Mytime before
they submitted their planning application for the Golf
That an upgraded CCTV unit would be installed
together with anti-ram raid bollards for the Café/Visitor
· That an estimate of vehicles entering the car park would be made due to the data being lost.
Cobtree Railway – A discussion ensued on the future viability of a railway running between Cobtree and Kent Life.
Mr Hext, Chairman of the Cobtree Charity Trust Ltd was present and advised that the Trustees were willing to commit a sum of £800,000 towards the project’s fruition but required the commitment of the Council to take the project forward and for Kent Life to take the lead role in operating the railway.
It was noted that an initial business plan had been commissioned but there was still a lot of work to be done.
The Chairman advised that the Cobtree Manor Estate Trust Committee (CMET) were committed to the project and would do all it could to help facilitate it but did not have the resources to put a lot of money into it themselves.
An action plan was drawn up:-
That the Chairman of CMET would write to Mr
Stickland of Planning Solutions to see
whether Kent Life would be willing to commit to investing in and
operating the railway and then meet with the relevant interested
That CMET would undertake to look at funding a
Project Manager should Kent Life be willing to progress the
That CMET would consider putting in £100,000
towards the project.
· That the Cobtree Trustees review the costings associated with the business plan and supply new costs.
Ms Hudd advised that a full specification would need to be produced, a number of surveys would need to be undertaken and various expert consultants engaged to inform the business plan.
That the Chairman would write to Planning Solutions
with a view to getting a response to the proposed business plan and
the Trust would review the Business Plan.
That the Committee would be prepared to fund a
Project Manager should the project be progressed.
Duration of Meeting
2 p.m. to 4 p.m.